{"title":"恶作剧镜:独联体白人女性在争取身体自主权的斗争中作为幸存者/罪犯/战友的形象转变","authors":"helen DeVinney","doi":"10.1080/15240657.2023.2166314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The editor of this special issue, focused on the sequelae of the Dobbs decision, first offers an imaginative and embodied exploration of a dream that served as an organizing theory and call to action for the issue itself. The paper explores the author’s whiteness as it relates to her own body’s trauma and her work to understand instances of sexual violence through lenses of systemic oppression; the author links the way cis white women are variable allies in the fight for bodily autonomy, noting that the specific ways cis white women take up space regarding sexual assault, as well as abortion, crowd out out voices of those who experience more direct and intersectional violence. This reflection and accountability have largely shaped her commitment to seeing psychoanalysis decouple from coloniality and embrace its revolutionary roots, working to help folks locate pathology in systemic oppression and organizing macrosystems, as opposed to individuals. The paper challenges readers to resist the seductiveness of thinking about the Dobbs decision as impacting “women,” vaguely, and instead to think about those specifically gendered, racialized, disabled, queer, fat, and foreign bodies that will be most impacted by the violence and implied potential breadth of Dobbs.","PeriodicalId":39339,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trick Mirrors: The Shape-Shifting of White CIS-Women as Survivors / Perpetrators / Comrades in the Fight for Bodily Autonomy\",\"authors\":\"helen DeVinney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15240657.2023.2166314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The editor of this special issue, focused on the sequelae of the Dobbs decision, first offers an imaginative and embodied exploration of a dream that served as an organizing theory and call to action for the issue itself. The paper explores the author’s whiteness as it relates to her own body’s trauma and her work to understand instances of sexual violence through lenses of systemic oppression; the author links the way cis white women are variable allies in the fight for bodily autonomy, noting that the specific ways cis white women take up space regarding sexual assault, as well as abortion, crowd out out voices of those who experience more direct and intersectional violence. This reflection and accountability have largely shaped her commitment to seeing psychoanalysis decouple from coloniality and embrace its revolutionary roots, working to help folks locate pathology in systemic oppression and organizing macrosystems, as opposed to individuals. The paper challenges readers to resist the seductiveness of thinking about the Dobbs decision as impacting “women,” vaguely, and instead to think about those specifically gendered, racialized, disabled, queer, fat, and foreign bodies that will be most impacted by the violence and implied potential breadth of Dobbs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2023.2166314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2023.2166314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trick Mirrors: The Shape-Shifting of White CIS-Women as Survivors / Perpetrators / Comrades in the Fight for Bodily Autonomy
ABSTRACT The editor of this special issue, focused on the sequelae of the Dobbs decision, first offers an imaginative and embodied exploration of a dream that served as an organizing theory and call to action for the issue itself. The paper explores the author’s whiteness as it relates to her own body’s trauma and her work to understand instances of sexual violence through lenses of systemic oppression; the author links the way cis white women are variable allies in the fight for bodily autonomy, noting that the specific ways cis white women take up space regarding sexual assault, as well as abortion, crowd out out voices of those who experience more direct and intersectional violence. This reflection and accountability have largely shaped her commitment to seeing psychoanalysis decouple from coloniality and embrace its revolutionary roots, working to help folks locate pathology in systemic oppression and organizing macrosystems, as opposed to individuals. The paper challenges readers to resist the seductiveness of thinking about the Dobbs decision as impacting “women,” vaguely, and instead to think about those specifically gendered, racialized, disabled, queer, fat, and foreign bodies that will be most impacted by the violence and implied potential breadth of Dobbs.
期刊介绍:
Beginning in the final two decades of the 20th century, the study of gender and sexuality has been revived from a variety of directions: the traditions of feminist scholarship, postclassical and postmodern psychoanalytic theory, developmental research, and cultural studies have all contributed to renewed fascination with those powerfully formative aspects of subjectivity that fall within the rubric of "gender" and "sexuality." Clinicians, for their part, have returned to gender and sexuality with heightened sensitivity to the role of these constructs in the treatment situation, including the richly variegated ways in which assumptions about gender and sexuality enter into our understandings of "normality" and "pathology."