作为艺术语言的“相对形式”:访问与截取

IF 0.2 0 ART
Ars Adriatica Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI:10.15291/ARS.2763
Katarina Rukavina
{"title":"作为艺术语言的“相对形式”:访问与截取","authors":"Katarina Rukavina","doi":"10.15291/ARS.2763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims at mapping and theoretically conceptualizing the controversies around the “relational form.” It does not, however, seek to conciliate the different positions or take “sides” in the debate; instead, it is based on concept-based methodology as an instrument offering a better insight into the researched object. Even though the form of contemporary art, be it as a process or as a procedure, is “broken” according to the traditional idea, the aim of this work is to examine the opposite. In the first part, the notion of “relational form” and the discourses related to its articulation are analyzed. The second part focuses on the techniques and procedures or strategies of the conceptual avant-gardes during the 1990s and 2000s. Eventually, the conclusion considers the efforts, debates, and possibilities of art in the extended field of relational practices. The aim of this research is to define more precisely the ontological status of contemporary art forms.","PeriodicalId":40226,"journal":{"name":"Ars Adriatica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"„Relacijska forma” kao umjetnički jezik: pristupi i prijepori\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Rukavina\",\"doi\":\"10.15291/ARS.2763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper aims at mapping and theoretically conceptualizing the controversies around the “relational form.” It does not, however, seek to conciliate the different positions or take “sides” in the debate; instead, it is based on concept-based methodology as an instrument offering a better insight into the researched object. Even though the form of contemporary art, be it as a process or as a procedure, is “broken” according to the traditional idea, the aim of this work is to examine the opposite. In the first part, the notion of “relational form” and the discourses related to its articulation are analyzed. The second part focuses on the techniques and procedures or strategies of the conceptual avant-gardes during the 1990s and 2000s. Eventually, the conclusion considers the efforts, debates, and possibilities of art in the extended field of relational practices. The aim of this research is to define more precisely the ontological status of contemporary art forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars Adriatica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars Adriatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15291/ARS.2763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15291/ARS.2763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在对围绕“关系形式”的争论进行映射和理论概念化。然而,它并不寻求调和不同的立场或在争论中采取“立场”;相反,它是基于基于概念的方法论,作为一种工具,可以更好地洞察研究对象。尽管当代艺术的形式,无论是作为一个过程还是作为一个程序,都按照传统观念被“打破”了,但这部作品的目的是审视相反的情况。在第一部分中,分析了“关系形式”的概念以及与之相关的话语。第二部分着重探讨20世纪90年代和21世纪初概念先锋派的技术、程序或策略。最后,结论考虑了艺术在关系实践的扩展领域中的努力、争论和可能性。本研究的目的是更准确地界定当代艺术形式的本体论地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
„Relacijska forma” kao umjetnički jezik: pristupi i prijepori
The paper aims at mapping and theoretically conceptualizing the controversies around the “relational form.” It does not, however, seek to conciliate the different positions or take “sides” in the debate; instead, it is based on concept-based methodology as an instrument offering a better insight into the researched object. Even though the form of contemporary art, be it as a process or as a procedure, is “broken” according to the traditional idea, the aim of this work is to examine the opposite. In the first part, the notion of “relational form” and the discourses related to its articulation are analyzed. The second part focuses on the techniques and procedures or strategies of the conceptual avant-gardes during the 1990s and 2000s. Eventually, the conclusion considers the efforts, debates, and possibilities of art in the extended field of relational practices. The aim of this research is to define more precisely the ontological status of contemporary art forms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信