地表下:利用综合电剖面法识别“瓜潘兰”地下洞穴

R. M. Antosia, Hendra Hidayat Akbar, N. A. Santoso, I. Putri, B. A. Farishi, Happy Christin Natalia
{"title":"地表下:利用综合电剖面法识别“瓜潘兰”地下洞穴","authors":"R. M. Antosia, Hendra Hidayat Akbar, N. A. Santoso, I. Putri, B. A. Farishi, Happy Christin Natalia","doi":"10.26418/positron.v13i1.63558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the geopark tourism areas in East Lampung Regency, \"Gua Pandan,\" has run into rock subsidence on the surface. As part of the subsidence prevention, indirect electrical methods between resistivity and chargeability profiling were applied to identify the presence of a subsurface cave in the study area. Two measurement lines were carried out with Wenner Alpha and Wenner Schlumberger arrays. Because the depth target is shallow (approximately 10 m) and to obtain a better resolution, each line has a stretch length of 70 m and 2 m electrode spacing. A line was measured over a known underground cave to produce a desired outcome, and the other was in an area with no cavities. Based on the results from each profile of resistivity and chargeability, an air-filled target has a value of over 5,000  and under 6 ms, respectively. Then, integrated processing of both methods generated a metal factor (MF) profile to view the presence and estimated shape of the cave/ cavities. The result represents that an MF value under 1.5 ms/Ωm is a cavity, and solid rock is over 1.5 ms/Ωm. Also, the MF level from both configurations delineates a similar section. However, a modest difference occurs in estimating the cavity shape geometry,  for Wenner Apha and  for Wenner Schlumberger. Furthermore, this study can be an initial step in safety assessment in the area.","PeriodicalId":31789,"journal":{"name":"Positron","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beneath the Surface: Identifying Subsurface Caves in \\\"Gua Pandan\\\" Using Integrated Electrical Profiling Method\",\"authors\":\"R. M. Antosia, Hendra Hidayat Akbar, N. A. Santoso, I. Putri, B. A. Farishi, Happy Christin Natalia\",\"doi\":\"10.26418/positron.v13i1.63558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the geopark tourism areas in East Lampung Regency, \\\"Gua Pandan,\\\" has run into rock subsidence on the surface. As part of the subsidence prevention, indirect electrical methods between resistivity and chargeability profiling were applied to identify the presence of a subsurface cave in the study area. Two measurement lines were carried out with Wenner Alpha and Wenner Schlumberger arrays. Because the depth target is shallow (approximately 10 m) and to obtain a better resolution, each line has a stretch length of 70 m and 2 m electrode spacing. A line was measured over a known underground cave to produce a desired outcome, and the other was in an area with no cavities. Based on the results from each profile of resistivity and chargeability, an air-filled target has a value of over 5,000  and under 6 ms, respectively. Then, integrated processing of both methods generated a metal factor (MF) profile to view the presence and estimated shape of the cave/ cavities. The result represents that an MF value under 1.5 ms/Ωm is a cavity, and solid rock is over 1.5 ms/Ωm. Also, the MF level from both configurations delineates a similar section. However, a modest difference occurs in estimating the cavity shape geometry,  for Wenner Apha and  for Wenner Schlumberger. Furthermore, this study can be an initial step in safety assessment in the area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Positron\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Positron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26418/positron.v13i1.63558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positron","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/positron.v13i1.63558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东楠榜县的一个地质公园旅游区“瓜潘丹”的地表出现了岩石沉降。作为沉降预防的一部分,应用电阻率和荷电性剖面之间的间接电学方法来识别研究区域内是否存在地下洞穴。使用Wenner Alpha和Wenner Schlumberger阵列进行两条测量线。因为深度目标是浅的(大约10m)并且为了获得更好的分辨率,每条线具有70m的拉伸长度和2m的电极间距。在一个已知的地下洞穴上测量了一条线,以产生所需的结果,另一条线位于没有洞穴的区域。根据电阻率和荷电性的每个剖面的结果,充气靶的值分别超过5000和低于6ms。然后,两种方法的综合处理生成了一个金属因子(MF)剖面,以查看洞穴/洞穴的存在和估计的形状。结果表明,MF值在1.5ms/Ωm以下为空洞,固体岩石在1.5ms/欧姆以上为空洞。此外,两种配置的MF级别描绘了一个相似的部分。然而,对于Wenner Apha和Wenner Schlumberger,在估计空腔形状几何结构时出现了适度的差异。此外,这项研究可以成为该地区安全评估的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beneath the Surface: Identifying Subsurface Caves in "Gua Pandan" Using Integrated Electrical Profiling Method
One of the geopark tourism areas in East Lampung Regency, "Gua Pandan," has run into rock subsidence on the surface. As part of the subsidence prevention, indirect electrical methods between resistivity and chargeability profiling were applied to identify the presence of a subsurface cave in the study area. Two measurement lines were carried out with Wenner Alpha and Wenner Schlumberger arrays. Because the depth target is shallow (approximately 10 m) and to obtain a better resolution, each line has a stretch length of 70 m and 2 m electrode spacing. A line was measured over a known underground cave to produce a desired outcome, and the other was in an area with no cavities. Based on the results from each profile of resistivity and chargeability, an air-filled target has a value of over 5,000  and under 6 ms, respectively. Then, integrated processing of both methods generated a metal factor (MF) profile to view the presence and estimated shape of the cave/ cavities. The result represents that an MF value under 1.5 ms/Ωm is a cavity, and solid rock is over 1.5 ms/Ωm. Also, the MF level from both configurations delineates a similar section. However, a modest difference occurs in estimating the cavity shape geometry,  for Wenner Apha and  for Wenner Schlumberger. Furthermore, this study can be an initial step in safety assessment in the area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信