乌克兰社会中道德与宗教的关系:德国理想主义的现代思考

V. Tytarenko
{"title":"乌克兰社会中道德与宗教的关系:德国理想主义的现代思考","authors":"V. Tytarenko","doi":"10.29202/UP/2/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kant’s and Hegel’s ways to resolve the problem of correlation between the morality and religion at first glance seem to be opposite. Such opinion is evidenced by Hegel’s statements in which he puts himself into the opposition to Kant and demonstrates his own theoretical and methodological superiority. Many scholars of German Idealism support such opinion. But in spite of such radical alternativeness, in author’s opinion, it is possible to discover some mutual and non-contradicting positions of Kant and Hegel on the issue of correlation between the morality and religion. The purpose of this article is a comparison of the Kant’s and Hegel’s ways to resolve the problem of correlation between the morality and religion in order to discover the moments of complementarity in these extremely alternative philosophical systems. The results of this inquiry can be fruitfully assembled and used by the modern Ukrainian political and social science for resolving of this problem within the modern Ukrainian society. To achieve this purpose, it is necessary: a) to analyze and compare the general methodology used by Kant and Hegel in their philosophical systems; b) to conduct a comparison of their doctrines on morality, religion, and their correlation; c) to carry out a research in order to discover how Kant’s and Hegel’s theoretical and practical models, as well as achieved conclusions, can be fruitfully applied in the modern comprehension of the problem of correlation between the morality and religion.","PeriodicalId":52964,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Policymaker","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between Morality and Religion in Ukrainian Society: Productive Ideas in German Idealism for Modern Consideration\",\"authors\":\"V. Tytarenko\",\"doi\":\"10.29202/UP/2/6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kant’s and Hegel’s ways to resolve the problem of correlation between the morality and religion at first glance seem to be opposite. Such opinion is evidenced by Hegel’s statements in which he puts himself into the opposition to Kant and demonstrates his own theoretical and methodological superiority. Many scholars of German Idealism support such opinion. But in spite of such radical alternativeness, in author’s opinion, it is possible to discover some mutual and non-contradicting positions of Kant and Hegel on the issue of correlation between the morality and religion. The purpose of this article is a comparison of the Kant’s and Hegel’s ways to resolve the problem of correlation between the morality and religion in order to discover the moments of complementarity in these extremely alternative philosophical systems. The results of this inquiry can be fruitfully assembled and used by the modern Ukrainian political and social science for resolving of this problem within the modern Ukrainian society. To achieve this purpose, it is necessary: a) to analyze and compare the general methodology used by Kant and Hegel in their philosophical systems; b) to conduct a comparison of their doctrines on morality, religion, and their correlation; c) to carry out a research in order to discover how Kant’s and Hegel’s theoretical and practical models, as well as achieved conclusions, can be fruitfully applied in the modern comprehension of the problem of correlation between the morality and religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrainian Policymaker\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrainian Policymaker\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29202/UP/2/6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Policymaker","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29202/UP/2/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

康德与黑格尔对道德与宗教关系问题的解决方法乍一看似乎是截然相反的。黑格尔将自己置于康德的对立面,并展示了自己在理论和方法上的优越性。许多德国理想主义学者支持这种观点。但笔者认为,尽管存在着这种激进的替代性,但在道德与宗教的关联问题上,我们还是可以发现康德与黑格尔的一些相互的、不矛盾的立场。本文的目的是比较康德和黑格尔解决道德与宗教关系问题的方法,以便在这两个极端对立的哲学体系中发现互补的时刻。这项调查的结果可以被现代乌克兰政治和社会科学卓有成效地收集和使用,以解决现代乌克兰社会中的这个问题。为了达到这一目的,有必要:a)分析和比较康德和黑格尔在其哲学体系中使用的一般方法论;B)对他们的道德、宗教教义及其相互关系进行比较;c)研究如何将康德和黑格尔的理论模型和实践模型以及得出的结论卓有成效地应用于对道德与宗教关系问题的现代理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between Morality and Religion in Ukrainian Society: Productive Ideas in German Idealism for Modern Consideration
Kant’s and Hegel’s ways to resolve the problem of correlation between the morality and religion at first glance seem to be opposite. Such opinion is evidenced by Hegel’s statements in which he puts himself into the opposition to Kant and demonstrates his own theoretical and methodological superiority. Many scholars of German Idealism support such opinion. But in spite of such radical alternativeness, in author’s opinion, it is possible to discover some mutual and non-contradicting positions of Kant and Hegel on the issue of correlation between the morality and religion. The purpose of this article is a comparison of the Kant’s and Hegel’s ways to resolve the problem of correlation between the morality and religion in order to discover the moments of complementarity in these extremely alternative philosophical systems. The results of this inquiry can be fruitfully assembled and used by the modern Ukrainian political and social science for resolving of this problem within the modern Ukrainian society. To achieve this purpose, it is necessary: a) to analyze and compare the general methodology used by Kant and Hegel in their philosophical systems; b) to conduct a comparison of their doctrines on morality, religion, and their correlation; c) to carry out a research in order to discover how Kant’s and Hegel’s theoretical and practical models, as well as achieved conclusions, can be fruitfully applied in the modern comprehension of the problem of correlation between the morality and religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信