{"title":"世界各地上肢差异儿童的治疗:初步发现","authors":"W. Hill, L. Hermansson","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction To support clinicians who treat children with upper-limb differences, we must first understand how these children are treated around the world. Study Design A descriptive survey was carried out in this study. Objectives The aim was to describe how treatment for children with upper-limb difference is provided in different parts of the world. Methods A web-based survey was used to gather data. The survey was shared on the Handsmart website, through providers and members using snowball sampling. Results Sixty-eight respondents from 18 countries, with most being occupational therapists and prosthetists, participated. All respondents reported that they provide prosthetic treatment and most fit a passive prosthesis before 1 year of age. Respondents from 13 countries reported having governmental funding for the provision of care for people with upper-limb loss. Intervention is guided by the presentation of the limb as well as availability of funding and other resources. In 12 countries, no treatment other than fitting of prostheses is provided for the children. The children who do not receive a prosthesis continue to see an occupational or physical therapist for other treatment (other devices, follow-up). Respondents stated that they would like to see clear treatment guidelines used by multidisciplinary teams to fit children and that treatment should include regular follow-up. Conclusions Children are treated differently in various parts of the world based on different funding, family support, and therapy resources. Further studies should encompass a geographically representative sample of children’s clinics. Clinical Relevance This study provides information regarding treatment practices for children with upper-limb loss/difference in various parts of the world; prosthetic treatment is common for children, although ages for fitting vary among clinics and countries. Results will contribute by supporting clinicians to provide better treatment for children with upper-limb loss/difference.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"35 1","pages":"149 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment for Children with Upper-Limb Differences in Various Parts of the World: Preliminary Findings\",\"authors\":\"W. Hill, L. Hermansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction To support clinicians who treat children with upper-limb differences, we must first understand how these children are treated around the world. Study Design A descriptive survey was carried out in this study. Objectives The aim was to describe how treatment for children with upper-limb difference is provided in different parts of the world. Methods A web-based survey was used to gather data. The survey was shared on the Handsmart website, through providers and members using snowball sampling. Results Sixty-eight respondents from 18 countries, with most being occupational therapists and prosthetists, participated. All respondents reported that they provide prosthetic treatment and most fit a passive prosthesis before 1 year of age. Respondents from 13 countries reported having governmental funding for the provision of care for people with upper-limb loss. Intervention is guided by the presentation of the limb as well as availability of funding and other resources. In 12 countries, no treatment other than fitting of prostheses is provided for the children. The children who do not receive a prosthesis continue to see an occupational or physical therapist for other treatment (other devices, follow-up). Respondents stated that they would like to see clear treatment guidelines used by multidisciplinary teams to fit children and that treatment should include regular follow-up. Conclusions Children are treated differently in various parts of the world based on different funding, family support, and therapy resources. Further studies should encompass a geographically representative sample of children’s clinics. Clinical Relevance This study provides information regarding treatment practices for children with upper-limb loss/difference in various parts of the world; prosthetic treatment is common for children, although ages for fitting vary among clinics and countries. Results will contribute by supporting clinicians to provide better treatment for children with upper-limb loss/difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment for Children with Upper-Limb Differences in Various Parts of the World: Preliminary Findings
ABSTRACT Introduction To support clinicians who treat children with upper-limb differences, we must first understand how these children are treated around the world. Study Design A descriptive survey was carried out in this study. Objectives The aim was to describe how treatment for children with upper-limb difference is provided in different parts of the world. Methods A web-based survey was used to gather data. The survey was shared on the Handsmart website, through providers and members using snowball sampling. Results Sixty-eight respondents from 18 countries, with most being occupational therapists and prosthetists, participated. All respondents reported that they provide prosthetic treatment and most fit a passive prosthesis before 1 year of age. Respondents from 13 countries reported having governmental funding for the provision of care for people with upper-limb loss. Intervention is guided by the presentation of the limb as well as availability of funding and other resources. In 12 countries, no treatment other than fitting of prostheses is provided for the children. The children who do not receive a prosthesis continue to see an occupational or physical therapist for other treatment (other devices, follow-up). Respondents stated that they would like to see clear treatment guidelines used by multidisciplinary teams to fit children and that treatment should include regular follow-up. Conclusions Children are treated differently in various parts of the world based on different funding, family support, and therapy resources. Further studies should encompass a geographically representative sample of children’s clinics. Clinical Relevance This study provides information regarding treatment practices for children with upper-limb loss/difference in various parts of the world; prosthetic treatment is common for children, although ages for fitting vary among clinics and countries. Results will contribute by supporting clinicians to provide better treatment for children with upper-limb loss/difference.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.