{"title":"2变化的景观和纪念碑拆除热潮,2015-20年","authors":"H. Green","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1939567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In response to the 2020 murder of George Floyd amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, protestors, government officials and institutional leaders removed Confederate monuments in the American South at a staggering pace. After extending their gaze to Christopher Columbus, Edward Colston and other monuments, additional removals and promises for removal and/or renaming occurred across the United States and the world. This third wave of the Confederate monument removal craze created an urgency to document and visualize its scope. Drawing on her Monument Removals mapping project, Green provides the numbers, context and spatial understanding of the recent revision to the commemorative landscape in the United States and global Black Lives Matter responses. Anti-black violence has shaped the removal trends from the Charleston Massacre to George Floyd. With over 240 monuments removed in the United States, the third (post-George Floyd) phase, moreover, represents a significant corrective that cannot be easily dismissed, just as the global anti-racist responses cannot be ignored. Green contends that additional scholarly attention is required, especially with regard to the history of monuments and the power dynamics influencing removal. Since communities are still engaged in the revision process, the resulting work has consequence for communities and scholars.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":"54 1","pages":"485 - 491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2 Shifting landscapes and the monument removal craze, 2015–20\",\"authors\":\"H. Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1939567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In response to the 2020 murder of George Floyd amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, protestors, government officials and institutional leaders removed Confederate monuments in the American South at a staggering pace. After extending their gaze to Christopher Columbus, Edward Colston and other monuments, additional removals and promises for removal and/or renaming occurred across the United States and the world. This third wave of the Confederate monument removal craze created an urgency to document and visualize its scope. Drawing on her Monument Removals mapping project, Green provides the numbers, context and spatial understanding of the recent revision to the commemorative landscape in the United States and global Black Lives Matter responses. Anti-black violence has shaped the removal trends from the Charleston Massacre to George Floyd. With over 240 monuments removed in the United States, the third (post-George Floyd) phase, moreover, represents a significant corrective that cannot be easily dismissed, just as the global anti-racist responses cannot be ignored. Green contends that additional scholarly attention is required, especially with regard to the history of monuments and the power dynamics influencing removal. Since communities are still engaged in the revision process, the resulting work has consequence for communities and scholars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patterns of Prejudice\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"485 - 491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patterns of Prejudice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1939567\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns of Prejudice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1939567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
2 Shifting landscapes and the monument removal craze, 2015–20
ABSTRACT In response to the 2020 murder of George Floyd amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, protestors, government officials and institutional leaders removed Confederate monuments in the American South at a staggering pace. After extending their gaze to Christopher Columbus, Edward Colston and other monuments, additional removals and promises for removal and/or renaming occurred across the United States and the world. This third wave of the Confederate monument removal craze created an urgency to document and visualize its scope. Drawing on her Monument Removals mapping project, Green provides the numbers, context and spatial understanding of the recent revision to the commemorative landscape in the United States and global Black Lives Matter responses. Anti-black violence has shaped the removal trends from the Charleston Massacre to George Floyd. With over 240 monuments removed in the United States, the third (post-George Floyd) phase, moreover, represents a significant corrective that cannot be easily dismissed, just as the global anti-racist responses cannot be ignored. Green contends that additional scholarly attention is required, especially with regard to the history of monuments and the power dynamics influencing removal. Since communities are still engaged in the revision process, the resulting work has consequence for communities and scholars.
期刊介绍:
Patterns of Prejudice provides a forum for exploring the historical roots and contemporary varieties of social exclusion and the demonization or stigmatisation of the Other. It probes the language and construction of "race", nation, colour, and ethnicity, as well as the linkages between these categories. It encourages discussion of issues at the top of the public policy agenda, such as asylum, immigration, hate crimes and citizenship. As none of these issues are confined to any one region, Patterns of Prejudice maintains a global optic, at the same time as scrutinizing intensely the history and development of intolerance and chauvinism in the United States and Europe, both East and West.