瑞士四个法语区智障人士的投票状况调查

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Barbara Fontana-Lana, Isabelle Petragallo, Manon Bach, Geneviève Petitpierre
{"title":"瑞士四个法语区智障人士的投票状况调查","authors":"Barbara Fontana-Lana,&nbsp;Isabelle Petragallo,&nbsp;Manon Bach,&nbsp;Geneviève Petitpierre","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Switzerland is a direct democracy, so its citizens are very often called to vote on various issues. Gaining voter status is, however, a very difficult process for many Swiss citizens with intellectual disability. This research describes the voting status of people with intellectual disability in four French–speaking cantons of Switzerland. It tries to understand systemic or structural factors, such as the guardianship legislation and the legal frameworks, that might have an impact on the voting status of these people. Three hundred individuals with intellectual disability (18–72 years) took part in the study. They were recruited in 11 facilities through a full selection or a letter-cluster sampling procedure depending on the age group. A questionnaire for each participant was anonymously completed by a support person in the facilities. The questionnaire was constructed with the assistance of self–advocates with intellectual disability, as well as that of people with various roles in decisions regarding voting rights, or providing support to people with intellectual disability, in the participating cantons. Descriptive analyses have been used. The results show that on average slightly more than one person with intellectual disability out of two received voting material, and about one out of two used it. Non-receipt of voting material is significantly linked to general curatorship, higher financial allowance, living in less independent conditions and/or working in the most protective sectors. People who use their rights more are those who live in more protective environments. Having an intellectual disability implies a higher risk of being deprived of one's political rights, even when the law does not systematically prescribe such a restriction. Even a tailor-made gradual guardianship system can result in rigid applications of the law, characterized by illegitimate deprivation of rights, such as the right to vote.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12465","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voting status of people with an intellectual disability in four French–speaking cantons of Switzerland: A survey\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Fontana-Lana,&nbsp;Isabelle Petragallo,&nbsp;Manon Bach,&nbsp;Geneviève Petitpierre\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jppi.12465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Switzerland is a direct democracy, so its citizens are very often called to vote on various issues. Gaining voter status is, however, a very difficult process for many Swiss citizens with intellectual disability. This research describes the voting status of people with intellectual disability in four French–speaking cantons of Switzerland. It tries to understand systemic or structural factors, such as the guardianship legislation and the legal frameworks, that might have an impact on the voting status of these people. Three hundred individuals with intellectual disability (18–72 years) took part in the study. They were recruited in 11 facilities through a full selection or a letter-cluster sampling procedure depending on the age group. A questionnaire for each participant was anonymously completed by a support person in the facilities. The questionnaire was constructed with the assistance of self–advocates with intellectual disability, as well as that of people with various roles in decisions regarding voting rights, or providing support to people with intellectual disability, in the participating cantons. Descriptive analyses have been used. The results show that on average slightly more than one person with intellectual disability out of two received voting material, and about one out of two used it. Non-receipt of voting material is significantly linked to general curatorship, higher financial allowance, living in less independent conditions and/or working in the most protective sectors. People who use their rights more are those who live in more protective environments. Having an intellectual disability implies a higher risk of being deprived of one's political rights, even when the law does not systematically prescribe such a restriction. Even a tailor-made gradual guardianship system can result in rigid applications of the law, characterized by illegitimate deprivation of rights, such as the right to vote.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12465\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12465\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瑞士是一个直接民主国家,所以它的公民经常被要求对各种问题进行投票。然而,对于许多智力残疾的瑞士公民来说,获得选民身份是一个非常困难的过程。本研究描述了瑞士四个法语区智障人士的投票状况。它试图理解可能对这些人的投票地位产生影响的系统性或结构性因素,例如监护立法和法律框架。300名智力残疾人士(18-72岁)参加了这项研究。他们在11个设施中招募,根据年龄组通过全面选择或字母群集抽样程序。每位参与者的问卷由设施中的支持人员匿名填写。问卷是在智障人士的自我倡导者以及参与州内参与投票权决策或为智障人士提供支持的人士的协助下编制的。使用了描述性分析。结果显示,平均每两个智障人士中就有一个多一点的人收到了投票材料,大约每两个智障人士中就有一个人使用了投票材料。未收到投票材料与一般策展人、较高的财政津贴、在较不独立的条件下生活和/或在最具保护性的部门工作密切相关。更多地使用自己权利的人是那些生活在更受保护的环境中的人。智力残疾意味着被剥夺政治权利的风险更高,即使法律没有系统地规定这种限制。即使是量身定制的渐进式监护制度也可能导致法律的严格适用,其特点是非法剥夺权利,例如投票权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Voting status of people with an intellectual disability in four French–speaking cantons of Switzerland: A survey

Voting status of people with an intellectual disability in four French–speaking cantons of Switzerland: A survey

Switzerland is a direct democracy, so its citizens are very often called to vote on various issues. Gaining voter status is, however, a very difficult process for many Swiss citizens with intellectual disability. This research describes the voting status of people with intellectual disability in four French–speaking cantons of Switzerland. It tries to understand systemic or structural factors, such as the guardianship legislation and the legal frameworks, that might have an impact on the voting status of these people. Three hundred individuals with intellectual disability (18–72 years) took part in the study. They were recruited in 11 facilities through a full selection or a letter-cluster sampling procedure depending on the age group. A questionnaire for each participant was anonymously completed by a support person in the facilities. The questionnaire was constructed with the assistance of self–advocates with intellectual disability, as well as that of people with various roles in decisions regarding voting rights, or providing support to people with intellectual disability, in the participating cantons. Descriptive analyses have been used. The results show that on average slightly more than one person with intellectual disability out of two received voting material, and about one out of two used it. Non-receipt of voting material is significantly linked to general curatorship, higher financial allowance, living in less independent conditions and/or working in the most protective sectors. People who use their rights more are those who live in more protective environments. Having an intellectual disability implies a higher risk of being deprived of one's political rights, even when the law does not systematically prescribe such a restriction. Even a tailor-made gradual guardianship system can result in rigid applications of the law, characterized by illegitimate deprivation of rights, such as the right to vote.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信