多余的词语,多余的名字:兰齐埃和哈贝马斯谈言语、能动性和平等

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. Feola
{"title":"多余的词语,多余的名字:兰齐埃和哈贝马斯谈言语、能动性和平等","authors":"M. Feola","doi":"10.5195/jffp.2019.889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Ranciere treat speech as the medium for politics and, likewise, both diagnose the pathologies that follow from blockages on civic speech.  That said, these broad commonalities give rise to significant divides regarding the social ontology of language, the forms of power that attend linguistic exchange, and how speech informs democratic agency. Ultimately, the essay will argue that Ranciere highlights the political deficits within deliberative commitments to democratic values. In doing so, his challenge yields broader insights for a democratic politics of speech and the linguistic resources that facilitate such a politics.","PeriodicalId":41846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"32-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excess Words, Surplus Names: Rancière and Habermas on Speech, Agency, and Equality\",\"authors\":\"M. Feola\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/jffp.2019.889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Ranciere treat speech as the medium for politics and, likewise, both diagnose the pathologies that follow from blockages on civic speech.  That said, these broad commonalities give rise to significant divides regarding the social ontology of language, the forms of power that attend linguistic exchange, and how speech informs democratic agency. Ultimately, the essay will argue that Ranciere highlights the political deficits within deliberative commitments to democratic values. In doing so, his challenge yields broader insights for a democratic politics of speech and the linguistic resources that facilitate such a politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"32-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2019.889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2019.889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尤尔根·哈贝马斯(Jurgen Habermas)和雅克·兰齐埃(Jacques Ranciere)将言论视为政治媒介,同样,他们都诊断了公民言论受阻所带来的病态。也就是说,这些广泛的共性在语言的社会本体论、参与语言交流的权力形式以及言论如何影响民主机构方面产生了重大分歧。最终,这篇文章将辩称,兰齐埃强调了对民主价值观的审议承诺中的政治缺陷。在这样做的过程中,他的挑战为民主言论政治和促进这种政治的语言资源带来了更广泛的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Excess Words, Surplus Names: Rancière and Habermas on Speech, Agency, and Equality
Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Ranciere treat speech as the medium for politics and, likewise, both diagnose the pathologies that follow from blockages on civic speech.  That said, these broad commonalities give rise to significant divides regarding the social ontology of language, the forms of power that attend linguistic exchange, and how speech informs democratic agency. Ultimately, the essay will argue that Ranciere highlights the political deficits within deliberative commitments to democratic values. In doing so, his challenge yields broader insights for a democratic politics of speech and the linguistic resources that facilitate such a politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信