某三甲医院铜绿假单胞菌耐药性分析

S. Bhatta, M. Pradhan, Alina Singh, R. Chaudhary, Y. I. Singh
{"title":"某三甲医院铜绿假单胞菌耐药性分析","authors":"S. Bhatta, M. Pradhan, Alina Singh, R. Chaudhary, Y. I. Singh","doi":"10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.28380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is one of the major cause of nosocomial infection. Multi-drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR PA) are increasingly encountered in clinical samples .Therefore, this study was undertaken to know the sensitivity pattern of P. aeruginosa and to detect MDR PA from clinical samples. Methods: This was a laboratory based retrospective-cross sectional study conducted at Department of Microbiology at a tertiary care referral centre in Kathmandu, Nepal from December 2018 to December 2019. Total of 200 isolates of P. aeruginosa were isolated from clinical samples. Non repetitive sample per patient was included in the study. Samples were processed according to standard methodology and antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AMST) was carried out by Modified Kirby Bauer disk diffusion test as per Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guideline. MDR was defined as strains resistant to one or more agent of ≥ 3 groups of antimicrobial categories. Results: Highest number of P. aeruginosa were isolated from sputum (93), followed by wound swab (35), and pus (29). AMST revealed the most sensitive drug to be Amikacin (91.51%) followed by Meropenem (78.5%) and Piperacillin/Tazobactam (77.50%). Out of 200 isolates, 69 (34.5%) were MDRPA. Conclusions: The information regarding sensitivity pattern of P. aeruginosa will help clinicians to choose most effective antimicrobials for the treatment of patients thus saving the time duration and total cost of patient management and also it will play a key role in setting antimicrobial stewardship policy.","PeriodicalId":33963,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","volume":"19 1","pages":"70-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.28380","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolated from a Tertiary Care Hospital\",\"authors\":\"S. Bhatta, M. Pradhan, Alina Singh, R. Chaudhary, Y. I. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.28380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is one of the major cause of nosocomial infection. Multi-drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR PA) are increasingly encountered in clinical samples .Therefore, this study was undertaken to know the sensitivity pattern of P. aeruginosa and to detect MDR PA from clinical samples. Methods: This was a laboratory based retrospective-cross sectional study conducted at Department of Microbiology at a tertiary care referral centre in Kathmandu, Nepal from December 2018 to December 2019. Total of 200 isolates of P. aeruginosa were isolated from clinical samples. Non repetitive sample per patient was included in the study. Samples were processed according to standard methodology and antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AMST) was carried out by Modified Kirby Bauer disk diffusion test as per Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guideline. MDR was defined as strains resistant to one or more agent of ≥ 3 groups of antimicrobial categories. Results: Highest number of P. aeruginosa were isolated from sputum (93), followed by wound swab (35), and pus (29). AMST revealed the most sensitive drug to be Amikacin (91.51%) followed by Meropenem (78.5%) and Piperacillin/Tazobactam (77.50%). Out of 200 isolates, 69 (34.5%) were MDRPA. Conclusions: The information regarding sensitivity pattern of P. aeruginosa will help clinicians to choose most effective antimicrobials for the treatment of patients thus saving the time duration and total cost of patient management and also it will play a key role in setting antimicrobial stewardship policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"70-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.28380\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.28380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.28380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa)是医院感染的主要原因之一。耐多药铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa, MDR PA)越来越多地出现在临床样品中,因此,本研究旨在了解P. aeruginosa的敏感性模式,并从临床样品中检测MDR PA。方法:这是一项基于实验室的回顾性横断面研究,于2018年12月至2019年12月在尼泊尔加德满都一家三级保健转诊中心的微生物科进行。从临床标本中共分离到铜绿假单胞菌200株。每位患者的非重复样本被纳入研究。样品按标准方法处理,抗菌药物敏感性试验采用改良Kirby - Bauer纸片扩散试验,按临床实验室标准学会指南进行。MDR定义为菌株对≥3组抗菌药物类别中的一种或多种药物耐药。结果:痰中检出铜绿假单胞菌最多(93例),其次为创面拭子(35例),脓液(29例)。AMST显示最敏感的药物为阿米卡星(91.51%),其次为美罗培南(78.5%)和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(77.50%)。200株中69株(34.5%)为MDRPA。结论:铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性信息有助于临床医生选择最有效的抗菌药物治疗患者,从而节省患者管理的时间和总成本,并在制定抗菌药物管理政策方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolated from a Tertiary Care Hospital
Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is one of the major cause of nosocomial infection. Multi-drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR PA) are increasingly encountered in clinical samples .Therefore, this study was undertaken to know the sensitivity pattern of P. aeruginosa and to detect MDR PA from clinical samples. Methods: This was a laboratory based retrospective-cross sectional study conducted at Department of Microbiology at a tertiary care referral centre in Kathmandu, Nepal from December 2018 to December 2019. Total of 200 isolates of P. aeruginosa were isolated from clinical samples. Non repetitive sample per patient was included in the study. Samples were processed according to standard methodology and antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AMST) was carried out by Modified Kirby Bauer disk diffusion test as per Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guideline. MDR was defined as strains resistant to one or more agent of ≥ 3 groups of antimicrobial categories. Results: Highest number of P. aeruginosa were isolated from sputum (93), followed by wound swab (35), and pus (29). AMST revealed the most sensitive drug to be Amikacin (91.51%) followed by Meropenem (78.5%) and Piperacillin/Tazobactam (77.50%). Out of 200 isolates, 69 (34.5%) were MDRPA. Conclusions: The information regarding sensitivity pattern of P. aeruginosa will help clinicians to choose most effective antimicrobials for the treatment of patients thus saving the time duration and total cost of patient management and also it will play a key role in setting antimicrobial stewardship policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信