作为晴雨表的就职演说

Q3 Arts and Humanities
R. Grüttemeier
{"title":"作为晴雨表的就职演说","authors":"R. Grüttemeier","doi":"10.5117/IN2019.2.003.GRUT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While Dutch literary studies are in a critical situation according to many, this is less often heard with regard to Dutch linguistics. Against this background, the article analyses recent inaugural lectures of Dutch literary scholars (from the Netherlands and from Germany) with regard to types of knowledge-production that can be taken from these lectures. It turns out that the accumulation of specific disciplinary knowledge does not seem to be the dominant programme of literary studies of modern Dutch literature in the Netherlands.","PeriodicalId":30182,"journal":{"name":"Internationale Neerlandistiek","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oraties als barometer\",\"authors\":\"R. Grüttemeier\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/IN2019.2.003.GRUT\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n While Dutch literary studies are in a critical situation according to many, this is less often heard with regard to Dutch linguistics. Against this background, the article analyses recent inaugural lectures of Dutch literary scholars (from the Netherlands and from Germany) with regard to types of knowledge-production that can be taken from these lectures. It turns out that the accumulation of specific disciplinary knowledge does not seem to be the dominant programme of literary studies of modern Dutch literature in the Netherlands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internationale Neerlandistiek\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internationale Neerlandistiek\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/IN2019.2.003.GRUT\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internationale Neerlandistiek","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/IN2019.2.003.GRUT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然许多人认为荷兰文学研究处于危急状态,但在荷兰语言学方面却很少听到这种情况。在此背景下,本文分析了荷兰文学学者(来自荷兰和德国)最近的就职讲座,并分析了这些讲座中可以获得的知识生产类型。事实证明,特定学科知识的积累似乎并不是荷兰现代荷兰文学研究的主导方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oraties als barometer
While Dutch literary studies are in a critical situation according to many, this is less often heard with regard to Dutch linguistics. Against this background, the article analyses recent inaugural lectures of Dutch literary scholars (from the Netherlands and from Germany) with regard to types of knowledge-production that can be taken from these lectures. It turns out that the accumulation of specific disciplinary knowledge does not seem to be the dominant programme of literary studies of modern Dutch literature in the Netherlands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internationale Neerlandistiek
Internationale Neerlandistiek Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信