用于引产的双球囊导管:12岁和24岁以后使用的剖腹产率和结果 h

D. Chen, Sayaka Okano, Charlotte Oyston
{"title":"用于引产的双球囊导管:12岁和24岁以后使用的剖腹产率和结果 h","authors":"D. Chen, Sayaka Okano, Charlotte Oyston","doi":"10.1002/rfc2.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The double‐balloon (dB) catheter is commonly used for cervical ripening before induction of labour (IoL), and is the preferred method of cervical ripening when prostaglandin is contraindicated. Manufacturer's instructions contraindicate use beyond 12 h. There is limited published evidence to support this restriction. This study aims to describe the mode of birth and other maternal and neonatal outcomes where dB‐IoL was used beyond the timeframe recommended by the manufacturer.Retrospective observational study of patients undergoing dB‐IoL at a single tertiary unit. Mode of birth, maternal and neonatal birth outcomes were described for those where the balloon was in situ for 12–24 and >24 h, compared to those where the balloon was in situ for <12 h.Of 491 patients undergoing dB‐IoL, there were no observed differences in proportion undergoing emergency caesarean or composite maternal/perinatal adverse outcomes when dB‐IoL was continued beyond 12 or 24 h.dB‐IoL is often being performed outside the manufacturer's recommendation to limit use to 12 h. In our cohort, dB‐IOL for >12 and >24 h is not associated with a higher proportion of caesarean birth and does not appear to impose harm on the mother or baby.","PeriodicalId":74669,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive, female and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double‐balloon catheter for induction of labour: Rates of caesarean birth and outcomes when used beyond 12 and 24 h\",\"authors\":\"D. Chen, Sayaka Okano, Charlotte Oyston\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rfc2.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The double‐balloon (dB) catheter is commonly used for cervical ripening before induction of labour (IoL), and is the preferred method of cervical ripening when prostaglandin is contraindicated. Manufacturer's instructions contraindicate use beyond 12 h. There is limited published evidence to support this restriction. This study aims to describe the mode of birth and other maternal and neonatal outcomes where dB‐IoL was used beyond the timeframe recommended by the manufacturer.Retrospective observational study of patients undergoing dB‐IoL at a single tertiary unit. Mode of birth, maternal and neonatal birth outcomes were described for those where the balloon was in situ for 12–24 and >24 h, compared to those where the balloon was in situ for <12 h.Of 491 patients undergoing dB‐IoL, there were no observed differences in proportion undergoing emergency caesarean or composite maternal/perinatal adverse outcomes when dB‐IoL was continued beyond 12 or 24 h.dB‐IoL is often being performed outside the manufacturer's recommendation to limit use to 12 h. In our cohort, dB‐IOL for >12 and >24 h is not associated with a higher proportion of caesarean birth and does not appear to impose harm on the mother or baby.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive, female and child health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive, female and child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive, female and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双球囊(dB)导管通常用于引产前宫颈成熟(IoL),在前列腺素禁忌时是宫颈成熟的首选方法。制造商说明书禁止使用超过12 h.支持这一限制的公开证据有限。本研究旨在描述在制造商建议的时间范围之外使用dB‐IoL的分娩模式和其他孕产妇和新生儿结果。在单个三级单位接受dB‐IoL治疗的患者的回顾性观察性研究。描述了球囊原位放置12-24和>24小时的分娩方式、产妇和新生儿的分娩结果 h、 与球囊原位12和>24的情况相比 h与较高比例的剖腹产无关,也不会对母亲或婴儿造成伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double‐balloon catheter for induction of labour: Rates of caesarean birth and outcomes when used beyond 12 and 24 h
The double‐balloon (dB) catheter is commonly used for cervical ripening before induction of labour (IoL), and is the preferred method of cervical ripening when prostaglandin is contraindicated. Manufacturer's instructions contraindicate use beyond 12 h. There is limited published evidence to support this restriction. This study aims to describe the mode of birth and other maternal and neonatal outcomes where dB‐IoL was used beyond the timeframe recommended by the manufacturer.Retrospective observational study of patients undergoing dB‐IoL at a single tertiary unit. Mode of birth, maternal and neonatal birth outcomes were described for those where the balloon was in situ for 12–24 and >24 h, compared to those where the balloon was in situ for <12 h.Of 491 patients undergoing dB‐IoL, there were no observed differences in proportion undergoing emergency caesarean or composite maternal/perinatal adverse outcomes when dB‐IoL was continued beyond 12 or 24 h.dB‐IoL is often being performed outside the manufacturer's recommendation to limit use to 12 h. In our cohort, dB‐IOL for >12 and >24 h is not associated with a higher proportion of caesarean birth and does not appear to impose harm on the mother or baby.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信