沃伦·s·内迪希与埃里克·莫尔斯的混合辩证法访谈

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 N/A ART
Warren Neidich, Erik Morse
{"title":"沃伦·s·内迪希与埃里克·莫尔斯的混合辩证法访谈","authors":"Warren Neidich, Erik Morse","doi":"10.1080/17514517.2022.2063600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This interview between the writer and critic Erik Morse and the artist and theorist Warren Neidich took place over the course of two months in the fall/winter 2021–2022. The interview focuses on a body of work entitled the Hybrid Dialectics produced between 1997–2002 that served as bridge between his earlier perfomative reenactments and fictitious documents entitled, American History Reinvented,1985–1993, and his more recent neon sculptures most notably the Pizzagate Neon, 2017–2021 and his A Proposition for an alt Parthenon Marbles Recoded: The Phantom as Other (2021–2022). Neidich's project extends his interdisciplinary experiments carried out in the fields of cinema studies, structural film and apparatus theory which foregrounded cinematic devices and tools at the expense of the image. This forms the foundation of Neidich’s engagement with photographic medium as a form of politicized aesthetics embedded in a bidirectional embodied and extended cognition. His hybrid dialectics take off where artists like Michael Snow and Tony Conrad left off. They are the result of grafted neuro-opthalmologic devices, used in the measurement of squint and skewed gaze, upon the photographic lens which results in a destabilized and estranged image; making them other and queered while at the same time challenging the stillness of the photographic object. The neuro-photographic assemblages release the vibrant energy of their human and non-human subjects distributing them across the surface of the photographic paper. These portray a lexicon of control that would later appear again, in his recent neon sculptures in the form of the Google effect, meme magic, and click bait. The Hybrid Dialects represented forms of dissensus against what Guy Debord called the Society of the Spectacle where as Neidich’s recent neon work is a rebuttal of the consciousness industry of social media and Big Data.","PeriodicalId":42826,"journal":{"name":"Photography and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hybrid Dialectics Interview between Warren S. Neidich and Erik Morse\",\"authors\":\"Warren Neidich, Erik Morse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17514517.2022.2063600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This interview between the writer and critic Erik Morse and the artist and theorist Warren Neidich took place over the course of two months in the fall/winter 2021–2022. The interview focuses on a body of work entitled the Hybrid Dialectics produced between 1997–2002 that served as bridge between his earlier perfomative reenactments and fictitious documents entitled, American History Reinvented,1985–1993, and his more recent neon sculptures most notably the Pizzagate Neon, 2017–2021 and his A Proposition for an alt Parthenon Marbles Recoded: The Phantom as Other (2021–2022). Neidich's project extends his interdisciplinary experiments carried out in the fields of cinema studies, structural film and apparatus theory which foregrounded cinematic devices and tools at the expense of the image. This forms the foundation of Neidich’s engagement with photographic medium as a form of politicized aesthetics embedded in a bidirectional embodied and extended cognition. His hybrid dialectics take off where artists like Michael Snow and Tony Conrad left off. They are the result of grafted neuro-opthalmologic devices, used in the measurement of squint and skewed gaze, upon the photographic lens which results in a destabilized and estranged image; making them other and queered while at the same time challenging the stillness of the photographic object. The neuro-photographic assemblages release the vibrant energy of their human and non-human subjects distributing them across the surface of the photographic paper. These portray a lexicon of control that would later appear again, in his recent neon sculptures in the form of the Google effect, meme magic, and click bait. The Hybrid Dialects represented forms of dissensus against what Guy Debord called the Society of the Spectacle where as Neidich’s recent neon work is a rebuttal of the consciousness industry of social media and Big Data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photography and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photography and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2022.2063600\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photography and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2022.2063600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要作家兼评论家埃里克·莫尔斯与艺术家兼理论家沃伦·内迪奇在2021年秋冬的两个月里进行了这次采访。采访的重点是1997年至2002年间创作的一系列名为《混合辩证法》的作品,这些作品是他早期的模仿和虚构文件《重塑美国历史,1985年至1993年》和他最近的霓虹灯雕塑之间的桥梁,最著名的是披萨门霓虹灯,2017–2021和他的《重新编码的另类帕特农神庙大理石提案:幻影如他》(2021–2022)。内迪奇的项目扩展了他在电影研究、结构电影和装置理论领域进行的跨学科实验,这些实验以牺牲图像为代价,为电影设备和工具奠定了基础。这构成了内迪奇参与摄影媒介的基础,摄影媒介是一种嵌入双向具体化和扩展认知中的政治化美学。他的混合辩证法从迈克尔·斯诺(Michael Snow)和托尼·康拉德(Tony Conrad;使它们相互矛盾,同时挑战摄影对象的静止。神经摄影组合释放出人类和非人类主体的活力,将其分布在相纸表面。这些描绘了一个控制词汇,后来又以谷歌效应、模因魔术和点击诱饵的形式出现在他最近的霓虹灯雕塑中。混合方言代表了对Guy Debord所称的“奇观社会”的各种不同意见,正如Neidich最近的霓虹灯作品一样,这是对社交媒体和大数据意识产业的反驳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Hybrid Dialectics Interview between Warren S. Neidich and Erik Morse
Abstract This interview between the writer and critic Erik Morse and the artist and theorist Warren Neidich took place over the course of two months in the fall/winter 2021–2022. The interview focuses on a body of work entitled the Hybrid Dialectics produced between 1997–2002 that served as bridge between his earlier perfomative reenactments and fictitious documents entitled, American History Reinvented,1985–1993, and his more recent neon sculptures most notably the Pizzagate Neon, 2017–2021 and his A Proposition for an alt Parthenon Marbles Recoded: The Phantom as Other (2021–2022). Neidich's project extends his interdisciplinary experiments carried out in the fields of cinema studies, structural film and apparatus theory which foregrounded cinematic devices and tools at the expense of the image. This forms the foundation of Neidich’s engagement with photographic medium as a form of politicized aesthetics embedded in a bidirectional embodied and extended cognition. His hybrid dialectics take off where artists like Michael Snow and Tony Conrad left off. They are the result of grafted neuro-opthalmologic devices, used in the measurement of squint and skewed gaze, upon the photographic lens which results in a destabilized and estranged image; making them other and queered while at the same time challenging the stillness of the photographic object. The neuro-photographic assemblages release the vibrant energy of their human and non-human subjects distributing them across the surface of the photographic paper. These portray a lexicon of control that would later appear again, in his recent neon sculptures in the form of the Google effect, meme magic, and click bait. The Hybrid Dialects represented forms of dissensus against what Guy Debord called the Society of the Spectacle where as Neidich’s recent neon work is a rebuttal of the consciousness industry of social media and Big Data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信