黑皂®作为疥疮辅助治疗的疗效和副作用:一项随机对照试验

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lidwina Anissa, Wresti Indriatmi, Larisa Paramitha Wibawa, Sandra Widaty
{"title":"黑皂®作为疥疮辅助治疗的疗效和副作用:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Lidwina Anissa, Wresti Indriatmi, Larisa Paramitha Wibawa, Sandra Widaty","doi":"10.13181/mji.oa.225965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Blacksoap® is recognized as adjuvant therapy for scabies, but there has been no significant study on its effectiveness. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between Blacksoap® and placebo on standard treatment for pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) scores before and after receiving therapy. \nMETHODS This single-blind randomized controlled trial was held in a boarding school in West Java in 2018. Subjects were recruited consecutively by random cluster sampling. Both groups received standard permethrin 5% cream therapy. The intervention group (n = 37) obtained Blacksoap®, while the control (n = 41) received baby soap. During the initial assessment, pruritus VAS and TEWL scores were taken. The cure rate, scores of pruritus VAS and TEWL, as well as side effects were assessed and compared during the first and fourth weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20 (IBM Corp., USA) by a third party, mostly using non-parametric tests. \nRESULTS The cure rate of the intervention group was lower than the control in the first week with 75% versus 81% but higher in the fourth week with 97% versus 92%. There was no significant difference in the scores of pruritus VAS and TEWL, as well as side effects between the two groups. \nCONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety of scabies treatment were similar between Blacksoap® and placebo adjunctive to standard treatment. Blacksoap®, on top of standard scabies treatment, might benefit patients by providing a higher cure rate in 4 weeks without any considerable adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":18302,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and side effects of Blacksoap® as adjuvant therapy of scabies: a randomized control trial\",\"authors\":\"Lidwina Anissa, Wresti Indriatmi, Larisa Paramitha Wibawa, Sandra Widaty\",\"doi\":\"10.13181/mji.oa.225965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Blacksoap® is recognized as adjuvant therapy for scabies, but there has been no significant study on its effectiveness. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between Blacksoap® and placebo on standard treatment for pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) scores before and after receiving therapy. \\nMETHODS This single-blind randomized controlled trial was held in a boarding school in West Java in 2018. Subjects were recruited consecutively by random cluster sampling. Both groups received standard permethrin 5% cream therapy. The intervention group (n = 37) obtained Blacksoap®, while the control (n = 41) received baby soap. During the initial assessment, pruritus VAS and TEWL scores were taken. The cure rate, scores of pruritus VAS and TEWL, as well as side effects were assessed and compared during the first and fourth weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20 (IBM Corp., USA) by a third party, mostly using non-parametric tests. \\nRESULTS The cure rate of the intervention group was lower than the control in the first week with 75% versus 81% but higher in the fourth week with 97% versus 92%. There was no significant difference in the scores of pruritus VAS and TEWL, as well as side effects between the two groups. \\nCONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety of scabies treatment were similar between Blacksoap® and placebo adjunctive to standard treatment. Blacksoap®, on top of standard scabies treatment, might benefit patients by providing a higher cure rate in 4 weeks without any considerable adverse effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Indonesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.225965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.225965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景Blacksoap®被公认为疥疮的辅助治疗,但尚未对其有效性进行重大研究。本研究旨在比较Blacksoap®和安慰剂在接受治疗前后对瘙痒视觉模拟评分(VAS)和经表皮失水量(TEWL)评分进行标准治疗的疗效和安全性。方法这项单盲随机对照试验于2018年在西爪哇的一所寄宿学校进行。受试者通过随机整群抽样连续招募。两组均接受标准的5%氯氰菊酯乳膏治疗。干预组(n=37)获得Blacksoap®,而对照组(n=41)获得婴儿肥皂。在初始评估期间,进行瘙痒VAS和TEWL评分。在第一周和第四周评估并比较治愈率、瘙痒VAS和TEWL评分以及副作用。数据由第三方使用SPSS软件版本20(IBM Corp.,USA)进行分析,主要使用非参数检验。结果干预组第1周治愈率低于对照组,分别为75%和81%,第4周治愈率高于对照组,为97%和92%。两组在瘙痒VAS和TEWL评分以及副作用方面没有显著差异。结论Blacksoap®和标准辅助治疗的安慰剂治疗疥疮的疗效和安全性相似。Blacksoap®在标准疥疮治疗的基础上,可以在4周内提供更高的治愈率,而不会产生任何显著的不良反应,从而使患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and side effects of Blacksoap® as adjuvant therapy of scabies: a randomized control trial
BACKGROUND Blacksoap® is recognized as adjuvant therapy for scabies, but there has been no significant study on its effectiveness. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between Blacksoap® and placebo on standard treatment for pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) scores before and after receiving therapy. METHODS This single-blind randomized controlled trial was held in a boarding school in West Java in 2018. Subjects were recruited consecutively by random cluster sampling. Both groups received standard permethrin 5% cream therapy. The intervention group (n = 37) obtained Blacksoap®, while the control (n = 41) received baby soap. During the initial assessment, pruritus VAS and TEWL scores were taken. The cure rate, scores of pruritus VAS and TEWL, as well as side effects were assessed and compared during the first and fourth weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20 (IBM Corp., USA) by a third party, mostly using non-parametric tests. RESULTS The cure rate of the intervention group was lower than the control in the first week with 75% versus 81% but higher in the fourth week with 97% versus 92%. There was no significant difference in the scores of pruritus VAS and TEWL, as well as side effects between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety of scabies treatment were similar between Blacksoap® and placebo adjunctive to standard treatment. Blacksoap®, on top of standard scabies treatment, might benefit patients by providing a higher cure rate in 4 weeks without any considerable adverse effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Indonesia
Medical Journal of Indonesia MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Journal of Indonesia is a peer-reviewed and open access journal that focuses on promoting medical sciences generated from basic sciences, clinical, and community or public health research to integrate researches in all aspects of human health. This journal publishes original articles, reviews, and also interesting case reports. Brief communications containing short features of medicine, latest developments in diagnostic procedures, treatment, or other health issues that is important for the development of health care system are also acceptable. Letters and commentaries of our published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信