成人体育活动促进干预中体育活动自我效能感的测量:一项系统综述

IF 1.7 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI:10.1080/1091367X.2021.1962324

André G. Bateman, Nicholas D. Myers, Sisi Chen, Seungmin Lee

{"title":"成人体育活动促进干预中体育活动自我效能感的测量:一项系统综述","authors":"André G. Bateman, Nicholas D. Myers, Sisi Chen, Seungmin Lee","doi":"10.1080/1091367X.2021.1962324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Self-efficacy is a psychosocial determinant of physical activity in adults. Different scales have been used to measure physical activity self-efficacy. This review examines the theoretical and measurement quality of scales measuring physical activity self-efficacy in physical activity-promoting interventions. The search strategy was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they measured physical activity self-efficacy in adults aged 18 to 65. One hundred sixteen studies were reviewed. Fourteen multi-item and five single-item scales were identified. The properties of the scales varied. The following issues were identified: (a) a lack of concordance between self-efficacy and physical activity measurement, (b) not specifying physical activity levels, (c) theoretically imprecise construct labels, (d) not emphasizing essential conceptual properties, (e) not reporting dimensionality and (f) the use of single-item measures. The scales showed good administrative properties. Recommendations are made to improve the measurement of physical activity self-efficacy.","PeriodicalId":48577,"journal":{"name":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"141 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Physical Activity Self-Efficacy in Physical Activity-Promoting Interventions in Adults: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"André G. Bateman, Nicholas D. Myers, Sisi Chen, Seungmin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1091367X.2021.1962324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Self-efficacy is a psychosocial determinant of physical activity in adults. Different scales have been used to measure physical activity self-efficacy. This review examines the theoretical and measurement quality of scales measuring physical activity self-efficacy in physical activity-promoting interventions. The search strategy was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they measured physical activity self-efficacy in adults aged 18 to 65. One hundred sixteen studies were reviewed. Fourteen multi-item and five single-item scales were identified. The properties of the scales varied. The following issues were identified: (a) a lack of concordance between self-efficacy and physical activity measurement, (b) not specifying physical activity levels, (c) theoretically imprecise construct labels, (d) not emphasizing essential conceptual properties, (e) not reporting dimensionality and (f) the use of single-item measures. The scales showed good administrative properties. Recommendations are made to improve the measurement of physical activity self-efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1962324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1962324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

自我效能感是成年人身体活动的心理社会决定因素。不同的量表被用来测量身体活动的自我效能。本文综述了体育活动自我效能感量表在体育活动促进干预中的理论质量和测量质量。搜索策略基于系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。如果研究测量了18至65岁成年人的身体活动自我效能感，就会纳入其中。我们回顾了116项研究。共有14个多条目量表和5个单条目量表。鳞片的性质各不相同。确定了以下问题:(a)自我效能感和身体活动测量之间缺乏一致性，(b)没有指定身体活动水平，(c)理论上不精确的结构标签，(d)没有强调基本的概念属性，(e)没有报告维度和(f)使用单项测量。该量表具有良好的管理性能。提出了改进体力活动自我效能感测量的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Measurement of Physical Activity Self-Efficacy in Physical Activity-Promoting Interventions in Adults: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT Self-efficacy is a psychosocial determinant of physical activity in adults. Different scales have been used to measure physical activity self-efficacy. This review examines the theoretical and measurement quality of scales measuring physical activity self-efficacy in physical activity-promoting interventions. The search strategy was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they measured physical activity self-efficacy in adults aged 18 to 65. One hundred sixteen studies were reviewed. Fourteen multi-item and five single-item scales were identified. The properties of the scales varied. The following issues were identified: (a) a lack of concordance between self-efficacy and physical activity measurement, (b) not specifying physical activity levels, (c) theoretically imprecise construct labels, (d) not emphasizing essential conceptual properties, (e) not reporting dimensionality and (f) the use of single-item measures. The scales showed good administrative properties. Recommendations are made to improve the measurement of physical activity self-efficacy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The scope of Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science (MPEES) covers original measurement research, special issues, and tutorials within six substantive disciplines of physical education and exercise science. Six of the seven sections of MPEES define the substantive disciplines within the purview of the original research to be published in the journal: Exercise Science, Physical Activity, Physical Education Pedagogy, Psychology, Research Methodology and Statistics, and Sport Management and Administration. The seventh section of MPEES, Tutorial and Teacher’s Toolbox, serves to provide an outlet for review and/or didactic manuscripts to be published in the journal. Special issues provide an avenue for a coherent set of manuscripts (e.g., four to five) to collectively focus in-depth on an important and timely measurement-related issue within the scope of MPEES. The primary aim of MPEES is to publish high-impact manuscripts, most of which will focus on original research, that fit within the scope of the journal.