劳动不团结:20世纪20年代左翼反共主义的根源

Q2 Arts and Humanities
S. Richman
{"title":"劳动不团结:20世纪20年代左翼反共主义的根源","authors":"S. Richman","doi":"10.1080/14743892.2021.1925040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Communist Party’s (CP) “Third Period” shift in labor policy from the Trade Union Education League (TUEL) effort of “boring from within” mainstream unions to the Trade Union Unity League (TUUL) effort to create new independent “revolutionary” unions is dismissed in much of the literature. In a close study of New York’s independent hotel workers, we see a more complex story. The CP and TUEL thwarted leftwing unionists’ efforts to organize a federation of independent, amalgamated industrial unions called the Labor Unity Council in the early 1920’s. Activists who resented the hasty directive to recreate an independent “Unity” federation of radical unions a few short years later became an early pocket of left-wing anti-communism. We also see how one union, the Amalgamated Food Workers, negotiated and resisted CP directives, as well as how its breakaway TUUL competitor, the Food Workers Industrial Union, was divisive until the New Deal National Recovery Administration labor codes forced the unions into a degree of coordination and eventually merger that preceded the CP shift toward the “Popular Front.”","PeriodicalId":35150,"journal":{"name":"American Communist History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2021.1925040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labor Dis-Unity: A 1920’s Source of Left-Wing anti-Communism\",\"authors\":\"S. Richman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14743892.2021.1925040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Communist Party’s (CP) “Third Period” shift in labor policy from the Trade Union Education League (TUEL) effort of “boring from within” mainstream unions to the Trade Union Unity League (TUUL) effort to create new independent “revolutionary” unions is dismissed in much of the literature. In a close study of New York’s independent hotel workers, we see a more complex story. The CP and TUEL thwarted leftwing unionists’ efforts to organize a federation of independent, amalgamated industrial unions called the Labor Unity Council in the early 1920’s. Activists who resented the hasty directive to recreate an independent “Unity” federation of radical unions a few short years later became an early pocket of left-wing anti-communism. We also see how one union, the Amalgamated Food Workers, negotiated and resisted CP directives, as well as how its breakaway TUUL competitor, the Food Workers Industrial Union, was divisive until the New Deal National Recovery Administration labor codes forced the unions into a degree of coordination and eventually merger that preceded the CP shift toward the “Popular Front.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":35150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Communist History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2021.1925040\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Communist History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2021.1925040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Communist History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2021.1925040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共产党在“第三时期”的劳工政策转变,从工会教育联盟(TUEL)努力“从内部无聊”主流工会,到工会团结联盟(TUUL)努力创建新的独立的“革命”工会,在许多文献中被驳回。在对纽约独立酒店员工的仔细研究中,我们看到了一个更复杂的故事。20世纪20年代初,共产党和TUEL挫败了左翼工会成员组建独立、合并的工业工会联盟的努力,该联盟被称为劳工团结委员会。几年后,激进分子对政府仓促下令重建一个由激进工会组成的独立“统一”联盟感到不满,他们成为左翼反共分子的早期支持者。我们也看到了一个工会,食品工人联合会,是如何谈判和抵制共产党的指令的,以及它的竞争对手,食品工人工业联盟,是如何分裂的,直到新政国家复兴管理局的劳工法规迫使工会进行一定程度的协调,并最终合并,在共产党转向“人民阵线”之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labor Dis-Unity: A 1920’s Source of Left-Wing anti-Communism
Abstract The Communist Party’s (CP) “Third Period” shift in labor policy from the Trade Union Education League (TUEL) effort of “boring from within” mainstream unions to the Trade Union Unity League (TUUL) effort to create new independent “revolutionary” unions is dismissed in much of the literature. In a close study of New York’s independent hotel workers, we see a more complex story. The CP and TUEL thwarted leftwing unionists’ efforts to organize a federation of independent, amalgamated industrial unions called the Labor Unity Council in the early 1920’s. Activists who resented the hasty directive to recreate an independent “Unity” federation of radical unions a few short years later became an early pocket of left-wing anti-communism. We also see how one union, the Amalgamated Food Workers, negotiated and resisted CP directives, as well as how its breakaway TUUL competitor, the Food Workers Industrial Union, was divisive until the New Deal National Recovery Administration labor codes forced the unions into a degree of coordination and eventually merger that preceded the CP shift toward the “Popular Front.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Communist History
American Communist History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信