21世纪的环境保护理论:缓慢进化还是范式转变?

IF 0.5 3区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
A. Orba̧sli
{"title":"21世纪的环境保护理论:缓慢进化还是范式转变?","authors":"A. Orba̧sli","doi":"10.1080/13556207.2017.1368187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The prevailing philosophies and world view of nineteenth-century Europe, the Arts and Crafts Movement, the writings of William Morris and John Ruskin, amongst others, came to define a conservation movement that shaped conservation practices in years to come. These philosophies, influenced by romanticism and rationalism also underpin what became known as modern conservation in the twentieth century and are embedded in numerous international charters and conventions, including the World Heritage Convention. In the twenty-first century heritage conservation has become a truly global concern, as heritage is commercialised like never before and threatened like never before. This article questions whether the established theories of conservation are still relevant to an expanding remit and changing demands of building conservation in the global context of the twenty-first century. It argues that established conservation principles and the tools that support them are woefully ill-equipped to respond to rapidly shifting attitudes globally and the management structures that have emerged out of neo-liberal outlooks.","PeriodicalId":44303,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural Conservation","volume":"23 1","pages":"157 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13556207.2017.1368187","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation theory in the twenty-first century: slow evolution or a paradigm shift?\",\"authors\":\"A. Orba̧sli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13556207.2017.1368187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The prevailing philosophies and world view of nineteenth-century Europe, the Arts and Crafts Movement, the writings of William Morris and John Ruskin, amongst others, came to define a conservation movement that shaped conservation practices in years to come. These philosophies, influenced by romanticism and rationalism also underpin what became known as modern conservation in the twentieth century and are embedded in numerous international charters and conventions, including the World Heritage Convention. In the twenty-first century heritage conservation has become a truly global concern, as heritage is commercialised like never before and threatened like never before. This article questions whether the established theories of conservation are still relevant to an expanding remit and changing demands of building conservation in the global context of the twenty-first century. It argues that established conservation principles and the tools that support them are woefully ill-equipped to respond to rapidly shifting attitudes globally and the management structures that have emerged out of neo-liberal outlooks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Architectural Conservation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"157 - 170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13556207.2017.1368187\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Architectural Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2017.1368187\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2017.1368187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

19世纪欧洲流行的哲学和世界观、工艺美术运动、威廉·莫里斯和约翰·拉斯金等人的著作,定义了一场保护运动,塑造了未来几年的保护实践。这些哲学受到浪漫主义和理性主义的影响,也为20世纪的现代保护奠定了基础,并被纳入许多国际宪章和公约,包括《世界遗产公约》。在21世纪,遗产保护已成为一个真正的全球性问题,因为遗产正以前所未有的方式被商业化,并受到前所未有的威胁。在21世纪的全球背景下,现有的建筑保护理论是否仍然适用于不断扩大的职权范围和不断变化的建筑保护需求。它认为,现有的保护原则和支持这些原则的工具,在应对全球迅速转变的态度和新自由主义观点所产生的管理结构方面,装备不足,令人遗憾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conservation theory in the twenty-first century: slow evolution or a paradigm shift?
ABSTRACT The prevailing philosophies and world view of nineteenth-century Europe, the Arts and Crafts Movement, the writings of William Morris and John Ruskin, amongst others, came to define a conservation movement that shaped conservation practices in years to come. These philosophies, influenced by romanticism and rationalism also underpin what became known as modern conservation in the twentieth century and are embedded in numerous international charters and conventions, including the World Heritage Convention. In the twenty-first century heritage conservation has become a truly global concern, as heritage is commercialised like never before and threatened like never before. This article questions whether the established theories of conservation are still relevant to an expanding remit and changing demands of building conservation in the global context of the twenty-first century. It argues that established conservation principles and the tools that support them are woefully ill-equipped to respond to rapidly shifting attitudes globally and the management structures that have emerged out of neo-liberal outlooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信