2型糖尿病患者糖尿病知识问卷的修订与心理测量学评价

Q3 Medicine
Diabetes Spectrum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-26 DOI:10.2337/ds22-0079
Julie A Zuñiga, Ya-Ching Huang, So Hyeon Bang, Heather Cuevas, Tara Hutson, Elizabeth M Heitkemper, Emma Cho, Alexandra A García
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者糖尿病知识问卷的修订与心理测量学评价","authors":"Julie A Zuñiga, Ya-Ching Huang, So Hyeon Bang, Heather Cuevas, Tara Hutson, Elizabeth M Heitkemper, Emma Cho, Alexandra A García","doi":"10.2337/ds22-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurately assess current knowledge needed for diabetes self-management. We revised the DKQ-24 and tested psychometric properties of the DKQ-Revised (DKQ-R) with a diverse sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a five-phase instrumentation study as follows: <i>1</i>) DKQ-24 items were revised to reflect current diabetes care standards; <i>2</i>) the Delphi method was used to evaluate the DKQ-R's content validity (<i>n</i> = 5 experts); <i>3</i>) cognitive interviews were conducted with people with type 2 diabetes (<i>n</i> = 5) to assess their interpretations of DKQ-R items; <i>4</i>) cross-sectional administration of the DKQ-R to adults with type 2 diabetes was carried out to assess internal consistency reliability and convergent validity; and <i>5</i>) an item analysis was conducted using discrimination index and point biserial analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After receiving the experts' feedback and conducting the cognitive interviews, 39 items were administered to 258 participants with type 2 diabetes (42.2% women; 29.1% Latino, 42.6% Asian, mean age 55.7 years). To select the final items, we considered the item discrimination index, as well as item-to-total correlations, content area, and participant feedback. The final 22-item DKQ-R uses the same yes/no/I don't know response format as the DKQ-24. The DKQ-R is strongly correlated with the DKQ-24 (<i>r</i> = 0.71, <i>P</i> <0.01) and is weakly correlated with diabetes numeracy (<i>r</i> = 0.23, <i>P</i> <0.01), indicating adequate convergent validity; a Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient of 0.77 indicated good reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DKQ-R is a reliable and valid updated measure of diabetes knowledge for diverse populations with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Julie A Zuñiga, Ya-Ching Huang, So Hyeon Bang, Heather Cuevas, Tara Hutson, Elizabeth M Heitkemper, Emma Cho, Alexandra A García\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/ds22-0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurately assess current knowledge needed for diabetes self-management. We revised the DKQ-24 and tested psychometric properties of the DKQ-Revised (DKQ-R) with a diverse sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a five-phase instrumentation study as follows: <i>1</i>) DKQ-24 items were revised to reflect current diabetes care standards; <i>2</i>) the Delphi method was used to evaluate the DKQ-R's content validity (<i>n</i> = 5 experts); <i>3</i>) cognitive interviews were conducted with people with type 2 diabetes (<i>n</i> = 5) to assess their interpretations of DKQ-R items; <i>4</i>) cross-sectional administration of the DKQ-R to adults with type 2 diabetes was carried out to assess internal consistency reliability and convergent validity; and <i>5</i>) an item analysis was conducted using discrimination index and point biserial analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After receiving the experts' feedback and conducting the cognitive interviews, 39 items were administered to 258 participants with type 2 diabetes (42.2% women; 29.1% Latino, 42.6% Asian, mean age 55.7 years). To select the final items, we considered the item discrimination index, as well as item-to-total correlations, content area, and participant feedback. The final 22-item DKQ-R uses the same yes/no/I don't know response format as the DKQ-24. The DKQ-R is strongly correlated with the DKQ-24 (<i>r</i> = 0.71, <i>P</i> <0.01) and is weakly correlated with diabetes numeracy (<i>r</i> = 0.23, <i>P</i> <0.01), indicating adequate convergent validity; a Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient of 0.77 indicated good reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DKQ-R is a reliable and valid updated measure of diabetes knowledge for diverse populations with type 2 diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Spectrum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病知识与健康相关,包括较低的A1C水平。糖尿病知识问卷(DKQ-24)是30年前为患有2型糖尿病的墨西哥裔美国人开发的,自在许多国家使用不同的样本以来,它包含了过时的项目,不再准确评估糖尿病自我管理所需的当前知识。我们修订了DKQ-24,并用不同的样本测试了DKQ-R的心理测量特性。我们进行了一项五阶段仪器研究,如下:1)修订了DKQ-24项目,以反映当前的糖尿病护理标准;2) 采用德尔菲法评价DKQ-R的内容有效性(n=5名专家);3) 对2型糖尿病患者(n=5)进行认知访谈,以评估他们对DKQ-R项目的解释;4) 对患有2型糖尿病的成年人进行DKQ-R的横断面给药,以评估内部一致性可靠性和收敛有效性;(5)运用判别指数和点双序列分析进行项目分析。在收到专家的反馈并进行认知访谈后,对258名2型糖尿病参与者(42.2%为女性;29.1%为拉丁裔,42.6%为亚裔,平均年龄55.7岁)进行了39项测试。为了选择最终的项目,我们考虑了项目区分指数,以及项目与总相关性、内容区域和参与者反馈。最后22项DKQ-R使用与DKQ-24相同的是/否/我不知道响应格式。DKQ-R与DKQ-24强相关(R=0.71,P<0.01),与糖尿病算术能力弱相关(R=0.23,P<0.01);0.77的Kuder-Richardson-20系数表示良好的可靠性。DKQ-R是对不同2型糖尿病人群糖尿病知识的可靠和有效的更新测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes.

Objective: Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurately assess current knowledge needed for diabetes self-management. We revised the DKQ-24 and tested psychometric properties of the DKQ-Revised (DKQ-R) with a diverse sample.

Methods: We conducted a five-phase instrumentation study as follows: 1) DKQ-24 items were revised to reflect current diabetes care standards; 2) the Delphi method was used to evaluate the DKQ-R's content validity (n = 5 experts); 3) cognitive interviews were conducted with people with type 2 diabetes (n = 5) to assess their interpretations of DKQ-R items; 4) cross-sectional administration of the DKQ-R to adults with type 2 diabetes was carried out to assess internal consistency reliability and convergent validity; and 5) an item analysis was conducted using discrimination index and point biserial analysis.

Results: After receiving the experts' feedback and conducting the cognitive interviews, 39 items were administered to 258 participants with type 2 diabetes (42.2% women; 29.1% Latino, 42.6% Asian, mean age 55.7 years). To select the final items, we considered the item discrimination index, as well as item-to-total correlations, content area, and participant feedback. The final 22-item DKQ-R uses the same yes/no/I don't know response format as the DKQ-24. The DKQ-R is strongly correlated with the DKQ-24 (r = 0.71, P <0.01) and is weakly correlated with diabetes numeracy (r = 0.23, P <0.01), indicating adequate convergent validity; a Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient of 0.77 indicated good reliability.

Conclusion: The DKQ-R is a reliable and valid updated measure of diabetes knowledge for diverse populations with type 2 diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信