“清晰而诚实的理解”:艾伦·福克斯与激进多元主义的起源和含义

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Michael Gold
{"title":"“清晰而诚实的理解”:艾伦·福克斯与激进多元主义的起源和含义","authors":"Michael Gold","doi":"10.3828/HSIR.2017.38.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most significant contributions to industrial relations theory over the last forty years has been Alan Fox’s elaboration of ‘radical pluralism’ as an analytical frame of reference. Though still highly influential, it has recently been criticized by Peter Ackers for allegedly confusing sociological and historical methodological procedures, prioritizing conflict over co-operation at the workplace, and lacking connection with policy-makers. This article, through close reference to Durkheim, demonstrates how and where radical pluralism differs from Marxist analysis, and why the distinction is so important in answering these criticisms. It concludes that radical pluralism, with its nuanced understanding of the complexities of social inequalities, has potentially a great deal to offer both analysts of contemporary industrial relations and policy-makers.","PeriodicalId":36746,"journal":{"name":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘A Clear and Honest Understanding’: Alan Fox and the Origins and Implications of Radical Pluralism\",\"authors\":\"Michael Gold\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/HSIR.2017.38.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most significant contributions to industrial relations theory over the last forty years has been Alan Fox’s elaboration of ‘radical pluralism’ as an analytical frame of reference. Though still highly influential, it has recently been criticized by Peter Ackers for allegedly confusing sociological and historical methodological procedures, prioritizing conflict over co-operation at the workplace, and lacking connection with policy-makers. This article, through close reference to Durkheim, demonstrates how and where radical pluralism differs from Marxist analysis, and why the distinction is so important in answering these criticisms. It concludes that radical pluralism, with its nuanced understanding of the complexities of social inequalities, has potentially a great deal to offer both analysts of contemporary industrial relations and policy-makers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/HSIR.2017.38.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/HSIR.2017.38.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在过去四十年中,对劳资关系理论最重要的贡献之一是艾伦·福克斯将“激进多元主义”作为分析参考框架的阐述。尽管它仍然具有很高的影响力,但最近彼得·阿克斯批评它混淆了社会学和历史方法论程序,将冲突置于工作场所的合作之上,并且缺乏与决策者的联系。本文通过对涂尔干的密切参考,展示了激进多元主义与马克思主义分析的区别以及在哪里,以及为什么这种区别在回答这些批评时如此重要。它得出的结论是,激进的多元主义对社会不平等的复杂性有着微妙的理解,对当代劳资关系的分析人士和政策制定者都有很大的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘A Clear and Honest Understanding’: Alan Fox and the Origins and Implications of Radical Pluralism
One of the most significant contributions to industrial relations theory over the last forty years has been Alan Fox’s elaboration of ‘radical pluralism’ as an analytical frame of reference. Though still highly influential, it has recently been criticized by Peter Ackers for allegedly confusing sociological and historical methodological procedures, prioritizing conflict over co-operation at the workplace, and lacking connection with policy-makers. This article, through close reference to Durkheim, demonstrates how and where radical pluralism differs from Marxist analysis, and why the distinction is so important in answering these criticisms. It concludes that radical pluralism, with its nuanced understanding of the complexities of social inequalities, has potentially a great deal to offer both analysts of contemporary industrial relations and policy-makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Historical Studies in Industrial Relations
Historical Studies in Industrial Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信