描绘抵达:跨越土著和黑人分歧走向非殖民化团结的自我命名

IF 2.1 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
April Petillo
{"title":"描绘抵达:跨越土著和黑人分歧走向非殖民化团结的自我命名","authors":"April Petillo","doi":"10.5250/fronjwomestud.41.2.0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Black and Indigenous solidarity is often challenging despite the shared intense focus on \"getting' free.\" While these communities are often incorrectly discussed as mutually exclusive and have histories complicated by geopolitical antagonisms between them, Vine Deloria Jr.'s 1971 proclamation about the complex challenges of generating solidarity between Black and Indigenous movements still holds relevance. Forging coalition between the two without reliance on colonially defined personal and political subjectivities or the twin projects of whiteness and capitalism is prickly. If we are \"to be free,\" then liberation may mean naming and claiming our own Selves, including our relationships to place and others, to signal a redefined/reassigned sociocultural fit with and in relation to one another. I posit Arrivantcy—a survivant-descendant status molded from Kamau Brathwaite's animation of the arrivant into a contemporary process of self-reflective recognition and self-identification—as vital to a decolonized solidarity that addresses the unrecognized anti-Blackness and anti-Indigenous relationality articulated for us through coloniality. This theoretical sketch presents Arrivantcy as a quotidian method of forging new relationships. Alongside reenvisioning Arrivant identity and arrivantcy work, the key components of naming and claiming are explored as viable means for recognizing our colonial pasts and their continued presence while resisting coloniality in our language, which deters \"unbecoming\" the colonial Black-Other, as well as complicity in Indigenous colonization and genocide. This interdisciplinary articulation interrogates how embracing Arrivantcy might address the complexity of US and diasporic non-Indigenous Blackness, the nuances of African American and Indigenous coalition-building, and how it operates in praxis.","PeriodicalId":46007,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"192 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sketching Arrivantcy: Self-Naming toward Decolonized Solidarity across Indigenous and Black Divides\",\"authors\":\"April Petillo\",\"doi\":\"10.5250/fronjwomestud.41.2.0192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Black and Indigenous solidarity is often challenging despite the shared intense focus on \\\"getting' free.\\\" While these communities are often incorrectly discussed as mutually exclusive and have histories complicated by geopolitical antagonisms between them, Vine Deloria Jr.'s 1971 proclamation about the complex challenges of generating solidarity between Black and Indigenous movements still holds relevance. Forging coalition between the two without reliance on colonially defined personal and political subjectivities or the twin projects of whiteness and capitalism is prickly. If we are \\\"to be free,\\\" then liberation may mean naming and claiming our own Selves, including our relationships to place and others, to signal a redefined/reassigned sociocultural fit with and in relation to one another. I posit Arrivantcy—a survivant-descendant status molded from Kamau Brathwaite's animation of the arrivant into a contemporary process of self-reflective recognition and self-identification—as vital to a decolonized solidarity that addresses the unrecognized anti-Blackness and anti-Indigenous relationality articulated for us through coloniality. This theoretical sketch presents Arrivantcy as a quotidian method of forging new relationships. Alongside reenvisioning Arrivant identity and arrivantcy work, the key components of naming and claiming are explored as viable means for recognizing our colonial pasts and their continued presence while resisting coloniality in our language, which deters \\\"unbecoming\\\" the colonial Black-Other, as well as complicity in Indigenous colonization and genocide. This interdisciplinary articulation interrogates how embracing Arrivantcy might address the complexity of US and diasporic non-Indigenous Blackness, the nuances of African American and Indigenous coalition-building, and how it operates in praxis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"192 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.41.2.0192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.41.2.0192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:尽管黑人和土著人都非常关注“获得自由”,但他们的团结往往具有挑战性。虽然这些社区经常被错误地认为是相互排斥的,而且他们之间的地缘政治对立使历史变得复杂,小Vine Deloria 1971年关于在黑人和土著运动之间建立团结的复杂挑战的宣言仍然具有相关性。在不依赖殖民地定义的个人和政治主观主义或白人和资本主义的双重项目的情况下,在两者之间建立联盟是棘手的。如果我们要“自由”,那么解放可能意味着命名和声称我们自己的自我,包括我们与地方和他人的关系,以表明重新定义/重新分配的社会文化与彼此的契合。我认为,Arrivantcy——一种生存的后代身份,从Kamau Brathwaite对arrivant的动画塑造成了一个自我反思的认可和自我认同的当代过程——对于非殖民化的团结至关重要,这种团结解决了通过殖民主义为我们表达的未被承认的反黑人和反土著关系。这张理论草图将Arrivantcy描述为一种建立新关系的日常方法。除了重新设想移民身份和移民工作外,命名和声称的关键组成部分也被探索为承认我们的殖民历史及其持续存在的可行手段,同时用我们的语言抵制殖民主义,这阻止了殖民地黑人的“不符合”,以及参与土著殖民和种族灭绝。这种跨学科的表述质疑了接受Arrivantcy如何解决美国和散居的非土著黑人的复杂性、非裔美国人和土著联盟建设的细微差别,以及它在实践中是如何运作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sketching Arrivantcy: Self-Naming toward Decolonized Solidarity across Indigenous and Black Divides
Abstract:Black and Indigenous solidarity is often challenging despite the shared intense focus on "getting' free." While these communities are often incorrectly discussed as mutually exclusive and have histories complicated by geopolitical antagonisms between them, Vine Deloria Jr.'s 1971 proclamation about the complex challenges of generating solidarity between Black and Indigenous movements still holds relevance. Forging coalition between the two without reliance on colonially defined personal and political subjectivities or the twin projects of whiteness and capitalism is prickly. If we are "to be free," then liberation may mean naming and claiming our own Selves, including our relationships to place and others, to signal a redefined/reassigned sociocultural fit with and in relation to one another. I posit Arrivantcy—a survivant-descendant status molded from Kamau Brathwaite's animation of the arrivant into a contemporary process of self-reflective recognition and self-identification—as vital to a decolonized solidarity that addresses the unrecognized anti-Blackness and anti-Indigenous relationality articulated for us through coloniality. This theoretical sketch presents Arrivantcy as a quotidian method of forging new relationships. Alongside reenvisioning Arrivant identity and arrivantcy work, the key components of naming and claiming are explored as viable means for recognizing our colonial pasts and their continued presence while resisting coloniality in our language, which deters "unbecoming" the colonial Black-Other, as well as complicity in Indigenous colonization and genocide. This interdisciplinary articulation interrogates how embracing Arrivantcy might address the complexity of US and diasporic non-Indigenous Blackness, the nuances of African American and Indigenous coalition-building, and how it operates in praxis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信