{"title":"Freedman-Bernstein对南非实习医生的肌肉骨骼能力测试:健康科学系之间有区别吗?","authors":"K. Coetzee, N. Gibson","doi":"10.17159/2309-8309/2020/V19N3A7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Basic competency in musculoskeletal medicine is necessary for all graduating doctors due to the growing burden of disease. Globally and nationally research has shown deficiencies in musculoskeletal knowledge according to the Freedman–Bernstein test. In South Africa, different health science faculties show different approaches to training; this article considers if any of these demonstrate adequate training and whether significant differences exist between the faculties’ results. The aim of the study is to determine whether there are significant differences between musculoskeletal learning outcomes between graduates from different health science faculties. \nMethods: A multi-centre, cross-sectional study was performed in which medical interns completed the Freedman–Bernstein test after graduation and prior to commencing their formal two-month block in orthopaedics. Data was then analysed to determine whether significant differences existed between the test scores of the eight health science faculties’ graduates. \nResults: A total of 259 completed tests were analysed. The mean score was 46% (range 4-88%, 95% CI 44-48%), and 244 of the 259 interns failed the test (94% failure rate). The lowest and highest mean scores, by health science faculty, was 34% (95% CI 28-40%) and 60% (95% CI 55-64%) respectively. An ANOVA test indicated statistically significant differences between test scores of the different health science faculties (p<0.001). \nConclusion: We have demonstrated competency scores consistent with previous literature from South Africa and shown that there are statistically significant differences between the health science faculties based on Freedman–Bernstein test scores. This evidence suggests differing levels of musculoskeletal knowledge attained at health science faculties in South Africa, and no improvement in undergraduate education in the last decade. \nLevel of evidence: Level 4","PeriodicalId":32220,"journal":{"name":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"167-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Freedman-Bernstein musculoskeletal competence testing of South African intern doctors: is there a difference between health science faculties?\",\"authors\":\"K. Coetzee, N. Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2309-8309/2020/V19N3A7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Basic competency in musculoskeletal medicine is necessary for all graduating doctors due to the growing burden of disease. Globally and nationally research has shown deficiencies in musculoskeletal knowledge according to the Freedman–Bernstein test. In South Africa, different health science faculties show different approaches to training; this article considers if any of these demonstrate adequate training and whether significant differences exist between the faculties’ results. The aim of the study is to determine whether there are significant differences between musculoskeletal learning outcomes between graduates from different health science faculties. \\nMethods: A multi-centre, cross-sectional study was performed in which medical interns completed the Freedman–Bernstein test after graduation and prior to commencing their formal two-month block in orthopaedics. Data was then analysed to determine whether significant differences existed between the test scores of the eight health science faculties’ graduates. \\nResults: A total of 259 completed tests were analysed. The mean score was 46% (range 4-88%, 95% CI 44-48%), and 244 of the 259 interns failed the test (94% failure rate). The lowest and highest mean scores, by health science faculty, was 34% (95% CI 28-40%) and 60% (95% CI 55-64%) respectively. An ANOVA test indicated statistically significant differences between test scores of the different health science faculties (p<0.001). \\nConclusion: We have demonstrated competency scores consistent with previous literature from South Africa and shown that there are statistically significant differences between the health science faculties based on Freedman–Bernstein test scores. This evidence suggests differing levels of musculoskeletal knowledge attained at health science faculties in South Africa, and no improvement in undergraduate education in the last decade. \\nLevel of evidence: Level 4\",\"PeriodicalId\":32220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"167-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2020/V19N3A7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2020/V19N3A7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:由于疾病负担的增加,肌肉骨骼医学的基本能力对所有即将毕业的医生都是必要的。根据弗里德曼-伯恩斯坦测试,全球和全国的研究都显示出肌肉骨骼知识的不足。在南非,不同的卫生科学学院表现出不同的培训方法;这篇文章考虑的是这些是否证明了充分的训练,以及教师之间的结果是否存在显著差异。本研究的目的是确定不同健康科学学院的毕业生在肌肉骨骼学习结果之间是否存在显著差异。方法:进行了一项多中心的横断面研究,在该研究中,医学实习生在毕业后和开始正式的为期两个月的骨科培训之前完成了Freedman-Bernstein测试。然后对数据进行分析,以确定八所健康科学学院毕业生的测试成绩之间是否存在显著差异。结果:共分析了259例已完成的检测。平均得分为46%(范围4-88%,95% CI 44-48%), 259名实习生中有244名没有通过测试(失败率94%)。卫生科学学院的最低和最高平均得分分别为34% (95% CI 28-40%)和60% (95% CI 55-64%)。ANOVA检验显示,不同卫生科学院系的考试成绩差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:我们已经证明了能力分数与南非先前的文献一致,并表明基于弗里德曼-伯恩斯坦测试分数的健康科学院系之间存在统计学上的显著差异。这一证据表明,南非卫生科学学院的肌肉骨骼知识水平不同,在过去十年中,本科教育没有任何改善。证据等级:四级
Freedman-Bernstein musculoskeletal competence testing of South African intern doctors: is there a difference between health science faculties?
Background: Basic competency in musculoskeletal medicine is necessary for all graduating doctors due to the growing burden of disease. Globally and nationally research has shown deficiencies in musculoskeletal knowledge according to the Freedman–Bernstein test. In South Africa, different health science faculties show different approaches to training; this article considers if any of these demonstrate adequate training and whether significant differences exist between the faculties’ results. The aim of the study is to determine whether there are significant differences between musculoskeletal learning outcomes between graduates from different health science faculties.
Methods: A multi-centre, cross-sectional study was performed in which medical interns completed the Freedman–Bernstein test after graduation and prior to commencing their formal two-month block in orthopaedics. Data was then analysed to determine whether significant differences existed between the test scores of the eight health science faculties’ graduates.
Results: A total of 259 completed tests were analysed. The mean score was 46% (range 4-88%, 95% CI 44-48%), and 244 of the 259 interns failed the test (94% failure rate). The lowest and highest mean scores, by health science faculty, was 34% (95% CI 28-40%) and 60% (95% CI 55-64%) respectively. An ANOVA test indicated statistically significant differences between test scores of the different health science faculties (p<0.001).
Conclusion: We have demonstrated competency scores consistent with previous literature from South Africa and shown that there are statistically significant differences between the health science faculties based on Freedman–Bernstein test scores. This evidence suggests differing levels of musculoskeletal knowledge attained at health science faculties in South Africa, and no improvement in undergraduate education in the last decade.
Level of evidence: Level 4