爱尔兰人的神奇白性:美国白人民族主义的语言和歌曲

Sean Williams
{"title":"爱尔兰人的神奇白性:美国白人民族主义的语言和歌曲","authors":"Sean Williams","doi":"10.1353/nhr.2021.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of “CelTiC”-Themed imagery—in clothing, tattoos, and business logos—has a long history in the United States. Its usage has generally been a simplified identifier of affiliation with Irish and/or Scottish heritage, and it is often uncritically adopted at the same level by tourists who visit Ireland and tell Irish people, “We’re Irish.” While white supremacists have also periodically drawn from Celtic imagery to support a claim of Celtic “whiteness,” that usage was fairly diffuse until recently. The public rise of white nationalism since the US presidential election of 2016, however, has led to adherents’ more public usage of Celtic symbolism. Three statements from Irish/Celtic Studies institutions in the United States publicly reject such appropriation. In early 2020, members of the Harvard Department of Celtic Languages and Literatures posted these words on the home page of their website: “There is no essential genetic ‘Celtic’ identity, nor is any ethnicity or group of ethnicities entitled to a privileged position within the field. Certain symbols associated with medieval Ireland and loosely identified as ‘Celtic’ have been appropriated by groups asserting the supremacy of persons with white skin. We repudiate this appropriation in the strongest possible terms.” Similarly, the Center for Irish Studies at Villanova University’s “Anti-Racism Statement” includes the following language: “Too often have white supremacists","PeriodicalId":87413,"journal":{"name":"New hibernia review = Iris eireannach nua","volume":"25 1","pages":"134 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Magical Whiteness of Being Irish: Language and Song in American White Nationalism\",\"authors\":\"Sean Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/nhr.2021.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of “CelTiC”-Themed imagery—in clothing, tattoos, and business logos—has a long history in the United States. Its usage has generally been a simplified identifier of affiliation with Irish and/or Scottish heritage, and it is often uncritically adopted at the same level by tourists who visit Ireland and tell Irish people, “We’re Irish.” While white supremacists have also periodically drawn from Celtic imagery to support a claim of Celtic “whiteness,” that usage was fairly diffuse until recently. The public rise of white nationalism since the US presidential election of 2016, however, has led to adherents’ more public usage of Celtic symbolism. Three statements from Irish/Celtic Studies institutions in the United States publicly reject such appropriation. In early 2020, members of the Harvard Department of Celtic Languages and Literatures posted these words on the home page of their website: “There is no essential genetic ‘Celtic’ identity, nor is any ethnicity or group of ethnicities entitled to a privileged position within the field. Certain symbols associated with medieval Ireland and loosely identified as ‘Celtic’ have been appropriated by groups asserting the supremacy of persons with white skin. We repudiate this appropriation in the strongest possible terms.” Similarly, the Center for Irish Studies at Villanova University’s “Anti-Racism Statement” includes the following language: “Too often have white supremacists\",\"PeriodicalId\":87413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New hibernia review = Iris eireannach nua\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"134 - 148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New hibernia review = Iris eireannach nua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/nhr.2021.0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New hibernia review = Iris eireannach nua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nhr.2021.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“CelTiC”主题图像在服装、纹身和商业标志中的使用在美国有着悠久的历史。它的用法通常是爱尔兰和/或苏格兰遗产归属的简化标识符,访问爱尔兰并告诉爱尔兰人“我们是爱尔兰人”的游客经常在同一级别不加批判地采用它。虽然白人至上主义者也经常从凯尔特人的图像中提取支持凯尔特人“白人”的说法,但直到最近,这种用法还相当普遍。然而,自2016年美国总统大选以来,白人民族主义的公开兴起,导致追随者更多地公开使用凯尔特人的象征意义。美国爱尔兰/凯尔特人研究机构的三份声明公开拒绝此类拨款。在2020年初,哈佛凯尔特语言文学系的成员在他们网站的主页上发布了这些文字:“没有基本的基因‘凯尔特人’身份,也没有任何种族或族裔群体有权在该领域享有特权。某些与中世纪爱尔兰有关的、被松散地认定为‘凯尔特人”的符号被主张白人至上的团体盗用。我们以最强烈的措辞否认这种挪用。”。同样,维拉诺瓦大学爱尔兰研究中心的“反种族主义声明”包括以下语言:“白人至上主义者太多了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Magical Whiteness of Being Irish: Language and Song in American White Nationalism
The use of “CelTiC”-Themed imagery—in clothing, tattoos, and business logos—has a long history in the United States. Its usage has generally been a simplified identifier of affiliation with Irish and/or Scottish heritage, and it is often uncritically adopted at the same level by tourists who visit Ireland and tell Irish people, “We’re Irish.” While white supremacists have also periodically drawn from Celtic imagery to support a claim of Celtic “whiteness,” that usage was fairly diffuse until recently. The public rise of white nationalism since the US presidential election of 2016, however, has led to adherents’ more public usage of Celtic symbolism. Three statements from Irish/Celtic Studies institutions in the United States publicly reject such appropriation. In early 2020, members of the Harvard Department of Celtic Languages and Literatures posted these words on the home page of their website: “There is no essential genetic ‘Celtic’ identity, nor is any ethnicity or group of ethnicities entitled to a privileged position within the field. Certain symbols associated with medieval Ireland and loosely identified as ‘Celtic’ have been appropriated by groups asserting the supremacy of persons with white skin. We repudiate this appropriation in the strongest possible terms.” Similarly, the Center for Irish Studies at Villanova University’s “Anti-Racism Statement” includes the following language: “Too often have white supremacists
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信