{"title":"英语语速评估研究:以专业与非专业评分者为中心","authors":"Mi-sun Kim","doi":"10.17250/khisli.36..201909.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kim, Mi-Sun. 2019. A study on evaluating English speech rate: Focusing on professional vs. non-professional raters. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 59-80. This study is designed to find out what speeds professional evaluators give the best scores to on speaking assessments and how their speed-related assessment differs from non-expert evaluators. The test tokens are designed to avoid the experimental complications that have normally appeared in previous studies of relevance. The test materials recorded by a trained native speaker with 8 different speed ranges are free of distortion caused by computer manipulation, and they exclude other factors affecting rating results as much as possible. Three different groups of eight each participated (8 native English raters and 8 Korean raters who had official evaluation experience on an English-speaking test as professional raters, and 8 general Korean student-raters with high English proficiency as non-professional raters), with 24 raters in total, and the results show that the range of the speaking rate that draws the highest score is between 4.43 and 4.50 syl/sec on average. The assessment of extremely fast speed ranges varied slightly among the three rater groups but all three groups showed a similar tendency. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on evaluating English speech rate: Focusing on professional vs. non-professional raters\",\"authors\":\"Mi-sun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17250/khisli.36..201909.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kim, Mi-Sun. 2019. A study on evaluating English speech rate: Focusing on professional vs. non-professional raters. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 59-80. This study is designed to find out what speeds professional evaluators give the best scores to on speaking assessments and how their speed-related assessment differs from non-expert evaluators. The test tokens are designed to avoid the experimental complications that have normally appeared in previous studies of relevance. The test materials recorded by a trained native speaker with 8 different speed ranges are free of distortion caused by computer manipulation, and they exclude other factors affecting rating results as much as possible. Three different groups of eight each participated (8 native English raters and 8 Korean raters who had official evaluation experience on an English-speaking test as professional raters, and 8 general Korean student-raters with high English proficiency as non-professional raters), with 24 raters in total, and the results show that the range of the speaking rate that draws the highest score is between 4.43 and 4.50 syl/sec on average. The assessment of extremely fast speed ranges varied slightly among the three rater groups but all three groups showed a similar tendency. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36..201909.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36..201909.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A study on evaluating English speech rate: Focusing on professional vs. non-professional raters
Kim, Mi-Sun. 2019. A study on evaluating English speech rate: Focusing on professional vs. non-professional raters. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 59-80. This study is designed to find out what speeds professional evaluators give the best scores to on speaking assessments and how their speed-related assessment differs from non-expert evaluators. The test tokens are designed to avoid the experimental complications that have normally appeared in previous studies of relevance. The test materials recorded by a trained native speaker with 8 different speed ranges are free of distortion caused by computer manipulation, and they exclude other factors affecting rating results as much as possible. Three different groups of eight each participated (8 native English raters and 8 Korean raters who had official evaluation experience on an English-speaking test as professional raters, and 8 general Korean student-raters with high English proficiency as non-professional raters), with 24 raters in total, and the results show that the range of the speaking rate that draws the highest score is between 4.43 and 4.50 syl/sec on average. The assessment of extremely fast speed ranges varied slightly among the three rater groups but all three groups showed a similar tendency. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.