企业社会责任制度化的关键参与者:跨国公司企业社会责任报告的组织间定位分析

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Sifan Xu, Dajung Woo
{"title":"企业社会责任制度化的关键参与者:跨国公司企业社会责任报告的组织间定位分析","authors":"Sifan Xu, Dajung Woo","doi":"10.1177/08933189221095770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on institutional theory, we position CSR reports as a crucial communication practice that provides evidence of shared norms, values, and relationships among organizations operating within the institutionalized environment. Through Fortune Global 500 companies’ CSR reports published in 2018 and using named entity recognition, we analyzed interorganizational networks to understand the driving forces behind CSR institutionalization. After fitting exponential random graph models (ERGMs) to the network, we found that standards-setting organizations played the most prominent role. In addition, we identified distinct sectoral preferences in companies’ interorganizational positioning in relation to legitimacy-granting organizations such as (inter)governmental agencies and financial organizations. We discuss the implications of the emphasis on standardization, sectoral differences, and network dynamics among various legitimacy-granting organizations on CSR institutionalization and CSR reporting as communicative constitution of institutional legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":47743,"journal":{"name":"Management Communication Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Players in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Institutionalization: An Analysis of Multinational Companies’ Interorganizational Positioning via CSR Reports\",\"authors\":\"Sifan Xu, Dajung Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08933189221095770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on institutional theory, we position CSR reports as a crucial communication practice that provides evidence of shared norms, values, and relationships among organizations operating within the institutionalized environment. Through Fortune Global 500 companies’ CSR reports published in 2018 and using named entity recognition, we analyzed interorganizational networks to understand the driving forces behind CSR institutionalization. After fitting exponential random graph models (ERGMs) to the network, we found that standards-setting organizations played the most prominent role. In addition, we identified distinct sectoral preferences in companies’ interorganizational positioning in relation to legitimacy-granting organizations such as (inter)governmental agencies and financial organizations. We discuss the implications of the emphasis on standardization, sectoral differences, and network dynamics among various legitimacy-granting organizations on CSR institutionalization and CSR reporting as communicative constitution of institutional legitimacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Communication Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Communication Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221095770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221095770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

根据制度理论,我们将企业社会责任报告定位为一种重要的沟通实践,它提供了在制度化环境中运作的组织之间共享规范、价值观和关系的证据。通过2018年发布的《财富》世界500强企业社会责任报告,并使用命名实体识别,我们分析了组织间网络,以了解企业社会责任制度化背后的驱动力。将指数随机图模型(ergm)拟合到网络中,我们发现标准制定组织发挥了最突出的作用。此外,我们在公司的组织间定位中确定了与合法性授予组织(如政府间机构和金融组织)相关的不同部门偏好。我们讨论了在各种合法性授予组织之间强调标准化、部门差异和网络动态对企业社会责任制度化和企业社会责任报告作为制度合法性的沟通构成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Players in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Institutionalization: An Analysis of Multinational Companies’ Interorganizational Positioning via CSR Reports
Drawing on institutional theory, we position CSR reports as a crucial communication practice that provides evidence of shared norms, values, and relationships among organizations operating within the institutionalized environment. Through Fortune Global 500 companies’ CSR reports published in 2018 and using named entity recognition, we analyzed interorganizational networks to understand the driving forces behind CSR institutionalization. After fitting exponential random graph models (ERGMs) to the network, we found that standards-setting organizations played the most prominent role. In addition, we identified distinct sectoral preferences in companies’ interorganizational positioning in relation to legitimacy-granting organizations such as (inter)governmental agencies and financial organizations. We discuss the implications of the emphasis on standardization, sectoral differences, and network dynamics among various legitimacy-granting organizations on CSR institutionalization and CSR reporting as communicative constitution of institutional legitimacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Management Communication Quarterly presents conceptually rigorous, empirically-driven, and practice-relevant research from across the organizational and management communication fields and has strong appeal across all disciplines concerned with organizational studies and the management sciences. Authors are encouraged to submit original theoretical and empirical manuscripts from a wide variety of methodological perspectives covering such areas as management, communication, organizational studies, organizational behavior and HRM, organizational theory and strategy, critical management studies, leadership, information systems, knowledge and innovation, globalization and international management, corporate communication, and cultural and intercultural studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信