质疑“可持续发展”中的经济优先范式:实现埃塞俄比亚发展与生态系统的融合

Q4 Social Sciences
T. B. Ghebretekle
{"title":"质疑“可持续发展”中的经济优先范式:实现埃塞俄比亚发展与生态系统的融合","authors":"T. B. Ghebretekle","doi":"10.4314/mlr.v11i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the concept of sustainable development after the Post-2015  Paris Climate Change Agreement with particular emphasis on Ethiopia. Various African countries are vulnerable to climate change, as is evidenced by recent droughts. Ethiopia is selected as a case study in light of its pace in economic growth and as a country which is among the ones that are most affected by climate change. I argue that the concept of sustainable development will be meaningful if it is related only to the core idea of ecological sustainability.  Long-term economic growth in Ethiopia is possible if the underlying environmental resources that underpin it are protected and enhanced.  Sustainable development remains peripheral and impractical as long as the pursuit of economic and social development remains the practical driving force behind the Ethiopian government’s policy as the primary measure of success. It is argued that the overarching standard for the application of sustainable development should be the integrity of the country’s ecosystem. It is the economic growth which needs to be aligned to the ecological integrity, not the other way round because equitable economic growth requires the protection of its foundation, i.e. the ecosystem. If sustainable development is not based on ecological integrity; it remains a form of hegemonic knowledge, ‘based on a narrow, weak notion of sustainability that  promotes reformist fantasies that the crisis can be addressed within the social, political, economic and cultural structures that created it.’ Keywords:  Ethiopia, sustainable development, economic growth, social development, ecological sustainability, weak sustainability, strong sustainability","PeriodicalId":30178,"journal":{"name":"Mizan Law Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"64-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.3","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrogating the economy-first paradigm in ‘Sustainable Development’: towards integrating development with the ecosystem in Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"T. B. Ghebretekle\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/mlr.v11i1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the concept of sustainable development after the Post-2015  Paris Climate Change Agreement with particular emphasis on Ethiopia. Various African countries are vulnerable to climate change, as is evidenced by recent droughts. Ethiopia is selected as a case study in light of its pace in economic growth and as a country which is among the ones that are most affected by climate change. I argue that the concept of sustainable development will be meaningful if it is related only to the core idea of ecological sustainability.  Long-term economic growth in Ethiopia is possible if the underlying environmental resources that underpin it are protected and enhanced.  Sustainable development remains peripheral and impractical as long as the pursuit of economic and social development remains the practical driving force behind the Ethiopian government’s policy as the primary measure of success. It is argued that the overarching standard for the application of sustainable development should be the integrity of the country’s ecosystem. It is the economic growth which needs to be aligned to the ecological integrity, not the other way round because equitable economic growth requires the protection of its foundation, i.e. the ecosystem. If sustainable development is not based on ecological integrity; it remains a form of hegemonic knowledge, ‘based on a narrow, weak notion of sustainability that  promotes reformist fantasies that the crisis can be addressed within the social, political, economic and cultural structures that created it.’ Keywords:  Ethiopia, sustainable development, economic growth, social development, ecological sustainability, weak sustainability, strong sustainability\",\"PeriodicalId\":30178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mizan Law Review\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"64-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.3\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mizan Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizan Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文考察了2015年后《巴黎气候变化协定》后的可持续发展概念,特别关注埃塞俄比亚。许多非洲国家都容易受到气候变化的影响,最近的干旱就是明证。埃塞俄比亚是根据其经济增长速度和受气候变化影响最大的国家之一而被选为案例研究的国家。我认为,如果可持续发展的概念只与生态可持续性的核心理念相关,那么它将是有意义的。如果支撑埃塞俄比亚的基本环境资源得到保护和加强,埃塞俄比亚的长期经济增长是可能的。只要追求经济和社会发展仍然是埃塞俄比亚政府政策背后的实际驱动力,可持续发展仍然是次要和不切实际的,这是衡量成功的首要标准。有人认为,应用可持续发展的首要标准应该是国家生态系统的完整性。经济增长需要与生态完整性保持一致,而不是相反,因为公平的经济增长需要保护其基础,即生态系统。如果可持续发展不是建立在生态完整性的基础上;它仍然是一种霸权知识,“基于一种狭隘而脆弱的可持续性概念,这种概念助长了改革派的幻想,即危机可以在造成危机的社会、政治、经济和文化结构中得到解决。”关键词:埃塞俄比亚、可持续发展、经济增长、社会发展、生态可持续性、弱可持续性、强可持续性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrogating the economy-first paradigm in ‘Sustainable Development’: towards integrating development with the ecosystem in Ethiopia
This article examines the concept of sustainable development after the Post-2015  Paris Climate Change Agreement with particular emphasis on Ethiopia. Various African countries are vulnerable to climate change, as is evidenced by recent droughts. Ethiopia is selected as a case study in light of its pace in economic growth and as a country which is among the ones that are most affected by climate change. I argue that the concept of sustainable development will be meaningful if it is related only to the core idea of ecological sustainability.  Long-term economic growth in Ethiopia is possible if the underlying environmental resources that underpin it are protected and enhanced.  Sustainable development remains peripheral and impractical as long as the pursuit of economic and social development remains the practical driving force behind the Ethiopian government’s policy as the primary measure of success. It is argued that the overarching standard for the application of sustainable development should be the integrity of the country’s ecosystem. It is the economic growth which needs to be aligned to the ecological integrity, not the other way round because equitable economic growth requires the protection of its foundation, i.e. the ecosystem. If sustainable development is not based on ecological integrity; it remains a form of hegemonic knowledge, ‘based on a narrow, weak notion of sustainability that  promotes reformist fantasies that the crisis can be addressed within the social, political, economic and cultural structures that created it.’ Keywords:  Ethiopia, sustainable development, economic growth, social development, ecological sustainability, weak sustainability, strong sustainability
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信