小学体育教育、结构化游戏和非结构化游戏对儿童执行功能的急性影响

Q2 Health Professions
Úna Kingston, M. Adamakis, J. Costa
{"title":"小学体育教育、结构化游戏和非结构化游戏对儿童执行功能的急性影响","authors":"Úna Kingston, M. Adamakis, J. Costa","doi":"10.7752/JPES.2020.S6442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Research continuously reports a close connection between Physical Activity (PA) and its effect on pupils’ Executive Functions (EF). Thus, the purpose of the present study was to expand previous knowledge and examine the acute effects on the EF – working memory and inhibition – in two primary level class cohorts (4th class: n = 20 students, mean age 9.95 ± .39 years; 6th class: n = 23 students, mean age 12.00 ± .30 years; 22 boys, 21 girls) of a school-based PA policy in a four-week design intervention programme. Methods: The PA policy included Physical Education (PE), Structured Play (SP) and Unstructured Play (UP). Testing of EF was carried out with a Working Memory Test and an Animal Stroop Test, before and after each session of each PA policy component. To determine whether each component of the PA intervention had an effect on working memory and inhibition, two separate repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance, controlling for gender and class as between-subject factors. Results: Results showed that the PE intervention improved more students’ working memory (3.49% increase), comparing to SP (p = .002, η = .057) and UP (p < .001, η = .077) interventions. Furthermore, the PE intervention improved more students’ inhibition (3.57% increase), comparing to SP (p = .001, η = .074) and UP (p < .001, η = .105) interventions. No gender and class differences were observed. Discussion: While whole school PA policies need to focus on all PA components and provide schoolbased opportunities to meet PA recommendations to benefit health in general, PE appears to be more beneficial for improving most students’ EF. Based on this finding, it is suggested that structured PE to be prioritised when developing PA policy in schools. Potential causes on the differences direct the conclusion towards school-based PA policy recommendations.","PeriodicalId":38917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Education and Sport","volume":"20 1","pages":"3260-3266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute effects of physical education, structured play, and unstructured play in children’s executive functions in primary school\",\"authors\":\"Úna Kingston, M. Adamakis, J. Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.7752/JPES.2020.S6442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Research continuously reports a close connection between Physical Activity (PA) and its effect on pupils’ Executive Functions (EF). Thus, the purpose of the present study was to expand previous knowledge and examine the acute effects on the EF – working memory and inhibition – in two primary level class cohorts (4th class: n = 20 students, mean age 9.95 ± .39 years; 6th class: n = 23 students, mean age 12.00 ± .30 years; 22 boys, 21 girls) of a school-based PA policy in a four-week design intervention programme. Methods: The PA policy included Physical Education (PE), Structured Play (SP) and Unstructured Play (UP). Testing of EF was carried out with a Working Memory Test and an Animal Stroop Test, before and after each session of each PA policy component. To determine whether each component of the PA intervention had an effect on working memory and inhibition, two separate repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance, controlling for gender and class as between-subject factors. Results: Results showed that the PE intervention improved more students’ working memory (3.49% increase), comparing to SP (p = .002, η = .057) and UP (p < .001, η = .077) interventions. Furthermore, the PE intervention improved more students’ inhibition (3.57% increase), comparing to SP (p = .001, η = .074) and UP (p < .001, η = .105) interventions. No gender and class differences were observed. Discussion: While whole school PA policies need to focus on all PA components and provide schoolbased opportunities to meet PA recommendations to benefit health in general, PE appears to be more beneficial for improving most students’ EF. Based on this finding, it is suggested that structured PE to be prioritised when developing PA policy in schools. Potential causes on the differences direct the conclusion towards school-based PA policy recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Education and Sport\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"3260-3266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Education and Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7752/JPES.2020.S6442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Education and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7752/JPES.2020.S6442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究不断报道体育活动(PA)与其对小学生执行功能(EF)的影响之间的密切联系。因此,本研究的目的是扩展先前的知识,并在两个初级水平班级队列中检验EF -工作记忆和抑制的急性影响(4班:n = 20名学生,平均年龄9.95±0.39岁;6班:23人,平均年龄12.00±0.30岁;22名男生,21名女生)在为期四周的设计干预计划中实施了以学校为基础的PA政策。方法:PA政策包括体育教育(PE)、结构化游戏(SP)和非结构化游戏(UP)。采用工作记忆测验和动物Stroop测验,分别在每个PA政策成分的前后进行EF测试。为了确定PA干预的每个组成部分是否对工作记忆和抑制有影响,我们进行了两个单独的重复测量多变量方差分析,控制了性别和阶级作为被试之间的因素。结果:与SP (p = 0.002, η = 0.057)和UP (p < 0.001, η = 0.077)干预相比,体育干预更能提高学生的工作记忆(提高3.49%)。此外,与SP (p = 0.001, η = 0.074)和UP (p < 0.001, η = 0.105)干预相比,体育干预更能改善学生的抑制(提高3.57%)。没有观察到性别和阶级差异。讨论:虽然整个学校的PA政策需要关注PA的所有组成部分,并提供基于学校的机会来满足PA的建议,以总体上有益于健康,但体育似乎更有利于提高大多数学生的EF。基于这一发现,建议在制定学校PA政策时优先考虑结构化体育。造成差异的潜在原因将导向以学校为本的PA政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute effects of physical education, structured play, and unstructured play in children’s executive functions in primary school
Purpose: Research continuously reports a close connection between Physical Activity (PA) and its effect on pupils’ Executive Functions (EF). Thus, the purpose of the present study was to expand previous knowledge and examine the acute effects on the EF – working memory and inhibition – in two primary level class cohorts (4th class: n = 20 students, mean age 9.95 ± .39 years; 6th class: n = 23 students, mean age 12.00 ± .30 years; 22 boys, 21 girls) of a school-based PA policy in a four-week design intervention programme. Methods: The PA policy included Physical Education (PE), Structured Play (SP) and Unstructured Play (UP). Testing of EF was carried out with a Working Memory Test and an Animal Stroop Test, before and after each session of each PA policy component. To determine whether each component of the PA intervention had an effect on working memory and inhibition, two separate repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance, controlling for gender and class as between-subject factors. Results: Results showed that the PE intervention improved more students’ working memory (3.49% increase), comparing to SP (p = .002, η = .057) and UP (p < .001, η = .077) interventions. Furthermore, the PE intervention improved more students’ inhibition (3.57% increase), comparing to SP (p = .001, η = .074) and UP (p < .001, η = .105) interventions. No gender and class differences were observed. Discussion: While whole school PA policies need to focus on all PA components and provide schoolbased opportunities to meet PA recommendations to benefit health in general, PE appears to be more beneficial for improving most students’ EF. Based on this finding, it is suggested that structured PE to be prioritised when developing PA policy in schools. Potential causes on the differences direct the conclusion towards school-based PA policy recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physical Education and Sport
Journal of Physical Education and Sport Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
282
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of JPES is to unite specialists from different fields, including sport, physical activity, kinesiology, education, health and nutrition, to provide the opportunity for multidisciplinary debates and comprehensive understanding of how physical activity influences human life. Researchers from areas that are related to sport and health are invited to publish their cutting-edge research and its practical applicability. Our target group of expert specialists includes academic researchers, kinesitherapists, physical education and sports teachers, physicians in sports medicine, psychologists, nutritionists, coaches and any other researchers involved in the sports field. JPES aims to act as a stimulus and a dissemination instrument for the research activity of Romanian and foreign investigators. JPES primarily publishes articles in the following fields: the natural sciences of sport, social and behavioral sciences and humanities, sports management, sports medicine, sports pedagogy and sport itself. The journal also aims to facilitate and enhance communication across all sub-disciplines of the sport sciences. The journal awaits original papers, review articles, technical reports and short communications that contain new insight into any aspect of the sport sciences that have not been previously published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信