概念与沟通:对奥诺弗里的回应

Q2 Arts and Humanities
DIALECTICA Pub Date : 2019-01-22 DOI:10.1111/1746-8361.12242
Henry Clarke
{"title":"概念与沟通:对奥诺弗里的回应","authors":"Henry Clarke","doi":"10.1111/1746-8361.12242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This note discusses Onofri's recent argument that no theory of concepts can jointly satisfy the <i>publicity constraint</i> and <i>Frege's constraint</i>, because these constraints are inconsistent. I show that this argument relies on the publicity constraint having an implication that it does not have.</p>","PeriodicalId":46676,"journal":{"name":"DIALECTICA","volume":"72 3","pages":"437-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1746-8361.12242","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concepts and Communication: A Reply to Onofri\",\"authors\":\"Henry Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1746-8361.12242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This note discusses Onofri's recent argument that no theory of concepts can jointly satisfy the <i>publicity constraint</i> and <i>Frege's constraint</i>, because these constraints are inconsistent. I show that this argument relies on the publicity constraint having an implication that it does not have.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIALECTICA\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"437-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1746-8361.12242\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIALECTICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-8361.12242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIALECTICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-8361.12242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了Onofri最近提出的观点,即任何概念理论都不能同时满足公示约束和弗雷格约束,因为这些约束是不一致的。我表明,这一论点依赖于具有它所没有的暗示的公开约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concepts and Communication: A Reply to Onofri

This note discusses Onofri's recent argument that no theory of concepts can jointly satisfy the publicity constraint and Frege's constraint, because these constraints are inconsistent. I show that this argument relies on the publicity constraint having an implication that it does not have.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIALECTICA
DIALECTICA PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Dialectica publishes first-rate articles predominantly in theoretical and systematic philosophy. It is edited in Switzerland and has a focus on analytical philosophy undertaken on the continent. Continuing the work of its founding members, dialectica seeks a better understanding of the mutual support between science and philosophy that both disciplines need and enjoy in their common search for understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信