{"title":"“Pretie运输”","authors":"Agnes Matuska","doi":"10.12745/et.25.2.4431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay addresses the controversy around the antitheatrical epilogue to the anonymous Tudor play Jack Juggler. Based on a close reading of heterogenous voices in the prologue combined with analysis of diverse traditions of playing invoked by the drama, it argues that the audience’s communal authority, centred in a shared experience of watching this comedy, threatens the epilogue’s pedantic, single-voice authority.","PeriodicalId":42222,"journal":{"name":"Early Theatre","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Pretie conveyance’\",\"authors\":\"Agnes Matuska\",\"doi\":\"10.12745/et.25.2.4431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay addresses the controversy around the antitheatrical epilogue to the anonymous Tudor play Jack Juggler. Based on a close reading of heterogenous voices in the prologue combined with analysis of diverse traditions of playing invoked by the drama, it argues that the audience’s communal authority, centred in a shared experience of watching this comedy, threatens the epilogue’s pedantic, single-voice authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Theatre\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Theatre\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12745/et.25.2.4431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Theatre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12745/et.25.2.4431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay addresses the controversy around the antitheatrical epilogue to the anonymous Tudor play Jack Juggler. Based on a close reading of heterogenous voices in the prologue combined with analysis of diverse traditions of playing invoked by the drama, it argues that the audience’s communal authority, centred in a shared experience of watching this comedy, threatens the epilogue’s pedantic, single-voice authority.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
