{"title":"科研创新团队成员适宜性评价研究","authors":"P. Ruan, Wei-hua Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo construct a quantitative evaluation model for the suitability evaluation of scientific research innovation team members. \n \n \nMethods \nFirstly to identify and clarify the key indicators of the evaluation of scientific research team members, including: the evaluation of professional relevance of members, academic contribution expectation of members, evaluation indicators of cooperation convenience, and analysis of common evaluation indicators of objectives. Secondly, to conduct qualitative analysis of relevant indicators to determine the weighting levels of each sub-item of different indicators. Finally, design the mathematical model of calculation according to the weights and scores granted to the importance, grade, etc. of the indicators. \n \n \nResults \nAfter the simulation calculation, the designed formula can better reflect the weighting level of different indicators, which makes the evaluation of the suitability of the research team members feasible. \n \n \nConclusions \nQuantitative evaluation of the suitability evaluation index of innovation team members makes the evaluation of innovation team members have evidence to follow, the evaluation results are fair and equitable, and easy to be accepted by all parties. It also helps to guide the team to clearly establish the direction. \n \n \nKey words: \nScientific research management; Innovation team; Science and technology evaluation; Quantitative evaluation","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"210-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on suitability evaluation of team members of scientific research and innovation team\",\"authors\":\"P. Ruan, Wei-hua Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo construct a quantitative evaluation model for the suitability evaluation of scientific research innovation team members. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFirstly to identify and clarify the key indicators of the evaluation of scientific research team members, including: the evaluation of professional relevance of members, academic contribution expectation of members, evaluation indicators of cooperation convenience, and analysis of common evaluation indicators of objectives. Secondly, to conduct qualitative analysis of relevant indicators to determine the weighting levels of each sub-item of different indicators. Finally, design the mathematical model of calculation according to the weights and scores granted to the importance, grade, etc. of the indicators. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAfter the simulation calculation, the designed formula can better reflect the weighting level of different indicators, which makes the evaluation of the suitability of the research team members feasible. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nQuantitative evaluation of the suitability evaluation index of innovation team members makes the evaluation of innovation team members have evidence to follow, the evaluation results are fair and equitable, and easy to be accepted by all parties. It also helps to guide the team to clearly establish the direction. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nScientific research management; Innovation team; Science and technology evaluation; Quantitative evaluation\",\"PeriodicalId\":59555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"210-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on suitability evaluation of team members of scientific research and innovation team
Objective
To construct a quantitative evaluation model for the suitability evaluation of scientific research innovation team members.
Methods
Firstly to identify and clarify the key indicators of the evaluation of scientific research team members, including: the evaluation of professional relevance of members, academic contribution expectation of members, evaluation indicators of cooperation convenience, and analysis of common evaluation indicators of objectives. Secondly, to conduct qualitative analysis of relevant indicators to determine the weighting levels of each sub-item of different indicators. Finally, design the mathematical model of calculation according to the weights and scores granted to the importance, grade, etc. of the indicators.
Results
After the simulation calculation, the designed formula can better reflect the weighting level of different indicators, which makes the evaluation of the suitability of the research team members feasible.
Conclusions
Quantitative evaluation of the suitability evaluation index of innovation team members makes the evaluation of innovation team members have evidence to follow, the evaluation results are fair and equitable, and easy to be accepted by all parties. It also helps to guide the team to clearly establish the direction.
Key words:
Scientific research management; Innovation team; Science and technology evaluation; Quantitative evaluation