{"title":"约翰·济慈与颞动脉","authors":"Hrileena Ghosh, S. Hughes","doi":"10.1080/09524142.2020.1822011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT John Keats trained as a surgeon at Guy’s Hospital from 1815 to 1817. However, despite being qualified, he never practised medicine. His close friend Charles Brown recounted Keats’s account of his ‘last operation’, which involved ‘opening a man’s temporal artery’. The account raises certain questions: why was Keats opening a man’s temporal artery; why did this operation – which presumably Keats did not know would be his ‘last’ when it took place – stick so clearly in his mind; and did this medical decision have any impact on the personal decision he took to leave medicine? Using records from the London Metropolitan Archives, medical notes from manuscripts maintained by Keats and other surgical students at Guy’s Hospital, and published works by eminent surgeons of the day including Astley Cooper and John Bell, we show that Keats was treating a patient with head injuries for his ‘last operation’. The essay further explores the significance this operation had for Keats, taking account of his father’s unexpected death from a head wound, and suggests that this particular procedure, with its emotional resonances, brought into focus for him an aspect of his temperament that left him uniquely unsuited to practise medicine, and strengthened his conviction to leave the medical profession.","PeriodicalId":41387,"journal":{"name":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","volume":"34 1","pages":"107 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Keats and the Temporal Artery\",\"authors\":\"Hrileena Ghosh, S. Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09524142.2020.1822011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT John Keats trained as a surgeon at Guy’s Hospital from 1815 to 1817. However, despite being qualified, he never practised medicine. His close friend Charles Brown recounted Keats’s account of his ‘last operation’, which involved ‘opening a man’s temporal artery’. The account raises certain questions: why was Keats opening a man’s temporal artery; why did this operation – which presumably Keats did not know would be his ‘last’ when it took place – stick so clearly in his mind; and did this medical decision have any impact on the personal decision he took to leave medicine? Using records from the London Metropolitan Archives, medical notes from manuscripts maintained by Keats and other surgical students at Guy’s Hospital, and published works by eminent surgeons of the day including Astley Cooper and John Bell, we show that Keats was treating a patient with head injuries for his ‘last operation’. The essay further explores the significance this operation had for Keats, taking account of his father’s unexpected death from a head wound, and suggests that this particular procedure, with its emotional resonances, brought into focus for him an aspect of his temperament that left him uniquely unsuited to practise medicine, and strengthened his conviction to leave the medical profession.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT John Keats trained as a surgeon at Guy’s Hospital from 1815 to 1817. However, despite being qualified, he never practised medicine. His close friend Charles Brown recounted Keats’s account of his ‘last operation’, which involved ‘opening a man’s temporal artery’. The account raises certain questions: why was Keats opening a man’s temporal artery; why did this operation – which presumably Keats did not know would be his ‘last’ when it took place – stick so clearly in his mind; and did this medical decision have any impact on the personal decision he took to leave medicine? Using records from the London Metropolitan Archives, medical notes from manuscripts maintained by Keats and other surgical students at Guy’s Hospital, and published works by eminent surgeons of the day including Astley Cooper and John Bell, we show that Keats was treating a patient with head injuries for his ‘last operation’. The essay further explores the significance this operation had for Keats, taking account of his father’s unexpected death from a head wound, and suggests that this particular procedure, with its emotional resonances, brought into focus for him an aspect of his temperament that left him uniquely unsuited to practise medicine, and strengthened his conviction to leave the medical profession.
期刊介绍:
The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.