共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察三种不同根管封闭剂对牙本质小管穿透力的比较

Q3 Dentistry
Hafize Gulmez, S. Kaya, Merve Yeniçeri Özata
{"title":"共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察三种不同根管封闭剂对牙本质小管穿透力的比较","authors":"Hafize Gulmez, S. Kaya, Merve Yeniçeri Özata","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_41_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study compared three different root canal sealers in terms of depth, area, and percentage of penetration into dentinal tubules. Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were allocated into three groups, each containing twenty teeth, and filled with either AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, or Well Root ST root canal sealers, and gutta-percha. Horizontal sections were taken at a distance of 1, 4, and 7 mm levels from the apical of the teeth and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Statistical analysis of the data involved running a Kruskal–Wallis-H-test. Results: There was no significant difference between the sealers in the apical and middle sections (P > 0.05). The penetration area and depth in the coronal section were the lowest in the MTA Fillapex compared to the AH Plus sealer (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the sections in terms of penetration percentage (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The sealers presented similar dentinal penetration area, depth, and percentage on the middle and apical sections. In the coronal section, the values were high within three parameters.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":"35 1","pages":"107 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of dentinal tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers by confocal laser scanning microscopy\",\"authors\":\"Hafize Gulmez, S. Kaya, Merve Yeniçeri Özata\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/endo.endo_41_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study compared three different root canal sealers in terms of depth, area, and percentage of penetration into dentinal tubules. Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were allocated into three groups, each containing twenty teeth, and filled with either AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, or Well Root ST root canal sealers, and gutta-percha. Horizontal sections were taken at a distance of 1, 4, and 7 mm levels from the apical of the teeth and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Statistical analysis of the data involved running a Kruskal–Wallis-H-test. Results: There was no significant difference between the sealers in the apical and middle sections (P > 0.05). The penetration area and depth in the coronal section were the lowest in the MTA Fillapex compared to the AH Plus sealer (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the sections in terms of penetration percentage (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The sealers presented similar dentinal penetration area, depth, and percentage on the middle and apical sections. In the coronal section, the values were high within three parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endodontology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_41_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_41_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了三种不同的根管密封剂的深度、面积和渗透到牙本质小管的百分比。方法:将60颗拔除的人下颌前磨牙分为3组,每组20颗牙,分别用AH Plus、MTA Fillapex或Well Root ST根管封闭剂和胶胶充填。在距离牙尖1、4和7毫米处取水平切片,在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)下检查。数据的统计分析包括运行kruskal - wallis - h测试。结果:根尖节段与中段节段的封堵效果差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与AH Plus密封剂相比,MTA Fillapex在冠状断面的穿透面积和深度最低(P < 0.05)。不同切片间穿透率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:两种牙体在中牙和根尖牙段的牙体穿透面积、深度和百分比相近。在冠状面,三个参数的值都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of dentinal tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers by confocal laser scanning microscopy
Aim: This study compared three different root canal sealers in terms of depth, area, and percentage of penetration into dentinal tubules. Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were allocated into three groups, each containing twenty teeth, and filled with either AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, or Well Root ST root canal sealers, and gutta-percha. Horizontal sections were taken at a distance of 1, 4, and 7 mm levels from the apical of the teeth and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Statistical analysis of the data involved running a Kruskal–Wallis-H-test. Results: There was no significant difference between the sealers in the apical and middle sections (P > 0.05). The penetration area and depth in the coronal section were the lowest in the MTA Fillapex compared to the AH Plus sealer (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the sections in terms of penetration percentage (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The sealers presented similar dentinal penetration area, depth, and percentage on the middle and apical sections. In the coronal section, the values were high within three parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信