结肠癌根治性切除术后的死亡原因和临床生存预测因素

O. Røkke, Thomas Heggelund, J. Benth, M. Røkke, K. Øvrebø
{"title":"结肠癌根治性切除术后的死亡原因和临床生存预测因素","authors":"O. Røkke, Thomas Heggelund, J. Benth, M. Røkke, K. Øvrebø","doi":"10.4236/JCT.2021.124017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical predictors of death and survival in \nsurgical treatment of colon cancer are \neasily confounded by the modern adjuvant and neo-adjuvant \nchemotherapy. This study focuses on lethality and survival during \nimplementation of ultra-radical surgery for colonic cancer prior to multimodal \ntherapy. Methods: Retrospective observational follow-up study of 824 \nconsecutive, unselected patients resected for Stage I, II, III and IV colon \ncancer from 1990 until 2000 at one tertiary centre, with a median follow-up of \n45 months (0 - 202 months). Predictors for death were assessed by Cox \nregression analyses and log-rank test. The cause of death was obtained from the \nNorwegian Cause of Death Registry. Results: The relative survival rates \nwere 86.3%, 71.9%, 50.3% and 6.6% in Stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. In \n28.7% of the patients, the cause of death \nwas other than colorectal cancer recurrence. The adjusted Cox regression model showed that higher age (1.04 (95% CI: 1.03; 1.05)), male gender (1.37 (1.14; 1.66)), emergency surgery (1.52 (1.21; 1.93)), left vs. right hemicolectomy (1.39 (1.03; \n1.87)), and perioperative blood transfusion (1.25 (1.01; 1.55)) were \npredictors of reduced survival. Health without known comorbidity (0.71 (0.58; \n0.88)), D2 versus D1 lymph node dissection (0.66 (0.53; 0.83)) and tumour Stage \nI, II, III versus Stage IV 0.10 (0.06; 0.16), 0.14 (0.11; 0.19), 0.23 (0.18; \n0.30) were associated with prolonged survival. Conclusions: In 28.7% of \nthe patients, the cause of death was other than colorectal cancer recurrence. \nAge, sex, comorbidity, emergency resection, \nlack of lymph node dissection, tumour stage, and preoperative blood transfusions are all significant predictors for reduced survival after \nsurgery for colon cancer.","PeriodicalId":66197,"journal":{"name":"癌症治疗(英文)","volume":"12 1","pages":"157-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cause of Death and Clinical Predictors of Survival after Curative Resection for Colon Cancer\",\"authors\":\"O. Røkke, Thomas Heggelund, J. Benth, M. Røkke, K. Øvrebø\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/JCT.2021.124017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Clinical predictors of death and survival in \\nsurgical treatment of colon cancer are \\neasily confounded by the modern adjuvant and neo-adjuvant \\nchemotherapy. This study focuses on lethality and survival during \\nimplementation of ultra-radical surgery for colonic cancer prior to multimodal \\ntherapy. Methods: Retrospective observational follow-up study of 824 \\nconsecutive, unselected patients resected for Stage I, II, III and IV colon \\ncancer from 1990 until 2000 at one tertiary centre, with a median follow-up of \\n45 months (0 - 202 months). Predictors for death were assessed by Cox \\nregression analyses and log-rank test. The cause of death was obtained from the \\nNorwegian Cause of Death Registry. Results: The relative survival rates \\nwere 86.3%, 71.9%, 50.3% and 6.6% in Stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. In \\n28.7% of the patients, the cause of death \\nwas other than colorectal cancer recurrence. The adjusted Cox regression model showed that higher age (1.04 (95% CI: 1.03; 1.05)), male gender (1.37 (1.14; 1.66)), emergency surgery (1.52 (1.21; 1.93)), left vs. right hemicolectomy (1.39 (1.03; \\n1.87)), and perioperative blood transfusion (1.25 (1.01; 1.55)) were \\npredictors of reduced survival. Health without known comorbidity (0.71 (0.58; \\n0.88)), D2 versus D1 lymph node dissection (0.66 (0.53; 0.83)) and tumour Stage \\nI, II, III versus Stage IV 0.10 (0.06; 0.16), 0.14 (0.11; 0.19), 0.23 (0.18; \\n0.30) were associated with prolonged survival. Conclusions: In 28.7% of \\nthe patients, the cause of death was other than colorectal cancer recurrence. \\nAge, sex, comorbidity, emergency resection, \\nlack of lymph node dissection, tumour stage, and preoperative blood transfusions are all significant predictors for reduced survival after \\nsurgery for colon cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":66197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"癌症治疗(英文)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"157-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"癌症治疗(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/JCT.2021.124017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"癌症治疗(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JCT.2021.124017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现代辅助和新辅助化疗很容易混淆癌症手术治疗中死亡和存活的临床预测因素。这项研究的重点是在多模式治疗前实施结肠癌症超常规手术期间的死亡率和生存率。方法:回顾性观察随访研究,对1990年至2000年在一个三级中心切除I、II、III和IV期癌症的824例未经选择的连续患者进行随访,中位随访时间为45个月(0-202个月)。死亡预测因素通过Cox回归分析和对数秩检验进行评估。死因是从挪威死因登记处获得的。结果:Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期的相对生存率分别为86.3%、71.9%、50.3%和6.6%。在28.7%的患者中,死亡原因不是大肠癌复发。经校正的Cox回归模型显示,较高的年龄(1.04(95%CI:1.03;1.05))、男性(1.37(1.14;1.66))、急诊手术(1.52(1.21;1.93))、左半结肠切除术与右半结肠切除手术(1.39(1.03;1.87))和围手术期输血(1.25(1.01;1.55))是生存率降低的预测因素。无已知共病的健康状况(0.71(0.58;0.88))、D2与D1淋巴结清扫(0.66(0.53;0.83))以及肿瘤I、II、III期与IV期0.10(0.06;0.16)、0.14(0.11;0.19)、0.23(0.18;0.30)与生存期延长相关。结论:在28.7%的患者中,死亡原因不是大肠癌复发。年龄、性别、合并症、急诊切除、淋巴结清扫不足、肿瘤分期和术前输血都是癌症术后生存率降低的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cause of Death and Clinical Predictors of Survival after Curative Resection for Colon Cancer
Background: Clinical predictors of death and survival in surgical treatment of colon cancer are easily confounded by the modern adjuvant and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. This study focuses on lethality and survival during implementation of ultra-radical surgery for colonic cancer prior to multimodal therapy. Methods: Retrospective observational follow-up study of 824 consecutive, unselected patients resected for Stage I, II, III and IV colon cancer from 1990 until 2000 at one tertiary centre, with a median follow-up of 45 months (0 - 202 months). Predictors for death were assessed by Cox regression analyses and log-rank test. The cause of death was obtained from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Results: The relative survival rates were 86.3%, 71.9%, 50.3% and 6.6% in Stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. In 28.7% of the patients, the cause of death was other than colorectal cancer recurrence. The adjusted Cox regression model showed that higher age (1.04 (95% CI: 1.03; 1.05)), male gender (1.37 (1.14; 1.66)), emergency surgery (1.52 (1.21; 1.93)), left vs. right hemicolectomy (1.39 (1.03; 1.87)), and perioperative blood transfusion (1.25 (1.01; 1.55)) were predictors of reduced survival. Health without known comorbidity (0.71 (0.58; 0.88)), D2 versus D1 lymph node dissection (0.66 (0.53; 0.83)) and tumour Stage I, II, III versus Stage IV 0.10 (0.06; 0.16), 0.14 (0.11; 0.19), 0.23 (0.18; 0.30) were associated with prolonged survival. Conclusions: In 28.7% of the patients, the cause of death was other than colorectal cancer recurrence. Age, sex, comorbidity, emergency resection, lack of lymph node dissection, tumour stage, and preoperative blood transfusions are all significant predictors for reduced survival after surgery for colon cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1185
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信