{"title":"元认知在行动中作为库存流动失败的可能解释","authors":"Gürsu Aşιk, Zerrin Doğança Küçük","doi":"10.1002/sdr.1692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at examining the role of metacognition, which refers to one ’ s ability to control and regulate their own thinking process through various activities in assessing dynamics of stocks and fl ows. The fi rst research question focuses on the metacognitive activities used by individuals who solved such tasks correctly and who did not. The second question focuses on how successfully participants organized their thinking processes to arrive at a correct answer when prompted and permitted to retry. Forty undergraduate students were involved in the study, and concurrent think-aloud protocol was used to examine their thinking when per- forming two stock- fl ow tasks. The fi ndings revealed that participants tend to have dif fi culties in reading, planning, monitoring, and checking activities. The effectiveness of metacognitive activi- ties employed by the participants is likely to decrease from reading to checking, respectively. The study contributes to our understanding of metacognitive de fi ciencies in stock- fl ow failure and provides further research suggestions. Review on behalf of System Dynamics Society.","PeriodicalId":51500,"journal":{"name":"System Dynamics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metacognition in action as a possible explanation for\\n stock‐flow\\n failure\",\"authors\":\"Gürsu Aşιk, Zerrin Doğança Küçük\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sdr.1692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims at examining the role of metacognition, which refers to one ’ s ability to control and regulate their own thinking process through various activities in assessing dynamics of stocks and fl ows. The fi rst research question focuses on the metacognitive activities used by individuals who solved such tasks correctly and who did not. The second question focuses on how successfully participants organized their thinking processes to arrive at a correct answer when prompted and permitted to retry. Forty undergraduate students were involved in the study, and concurrent think-aloud protocol was used to examine their thinking when per- forming two stock- fl ow tasks. The fi ndings revealed that participants tend to have dif fi culties in reading, planning, monitoring, and checking activities. The effectiveness of metacognitive activi- ties employed by the participants is likely to decrease from reading to checking, respectively. The study contributes to our understanding of metacognitive de fi ciencies in stock- fl ow failure and provides further research suggestions. Review on behalf of System Dynamics Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1692\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System Dynamics Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metacognition in action as a possible explanation for
stock‐flow
failure
This study aims at examining the role of metacognition, which refers to one ’ s ability to control and regulate their own thinking process through various activities in assessing dynamics of stocks and fl ows. The fi rst research question focuses on the metacognitive activities used by individuals who solved such tasks correctly and who did not. The second question focuses on how successfully participants organized their thinking processes to arrive at a correct answer when prompted and permitted to retry. Forty undergraduate students were involved in the study, and concurrent think-aloud protocol was used to examine their thinking when per- forming two stock- fl ow tasks. The fi ndings revealed that participants tend to have dif fi culties in reading, planning, monitoring, and checking activities. The effectiveness of metacognitive activi- ties employed by the participants is likely to decrease from reading to checking, respectively. The study contributes to our understanding of metacognitive de fi ciencies in stock- fl ow failure and provides further research suggestions. Review on behalf of System Dynamics Society.
期刊介绍:
The System Dynamics Review exists to communicate to a wide audience advances in the application of the perspectives and methods of system dynamics to societal, technical, managerial, and environmental problems. The Review publishes: advances in mathematical modelling and computer simulation of dynamic feedback systems; advances in methods of policy analysis based on information feedback and circular causality; generic structures (dynamic feedback systems that support particular widely applicable behavioural insights); system dynamics contributions to theory building in the social and natural sciences; policy studies and debate emphasizing the role of feedback and circular causality in problem behaviour.