是什么推动了新西兰地区卫生委员会的生产力增长:技术、效率还是规模?

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS
Antony Andrews, G. Emvalomatis
{"title":"是什么推动了新西兰地区卫生委员会的生产力增长:技术、效率还是规模?","authors":"Antony Andrews, G. Emvalomatis","doi":"10.1080/00779954.2023.2181859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the longitudinal data on New Zealand District Health Boards (DHBs) for the period 2011-2018, the total factor productivity (TFP) change and its components are evaluated using an input distance function and a cost function. The empirical results indicate that TFP decreased at an average rate of between 0.73 and 0.98 per cent annually, mainly due to the deterioration of the technological component, which averaged close to −2 per cent between 2011 and 2018. However, contrary to the technological component, the scale component improved every year at an average rate of 1–1.16 per cent, thus cushioning some of the effects of the deteriorating technological component of the TFP. The TFP also posted a one-off positive growth in 2016, following the nationwide implementation of an ‘elective initiative’ programme in the 2015–2016 year, which raised both the scale and efficiency (technical and cost) components to their highest levels. Furthermore, the study also demonstrates the consistency in the effect of scale and technological change components on the TFP under both primal and dual approaches.","PeriodicalId":38921,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Economic Papers","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drives the productivity growth of New Zealand district health boards: technology, efficiency, or scale?\",\"authors\":\"Antony Andrews, G. Emvalomatis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00779954.2023.2181859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the longitudinal data on New Zealand District Health Boards (DHBs) for the period 2011-2018, the total factor productivity (TFP) change and its components are evaluated using an input distance function and a cost function. The empirical results indicate that TFP decreased at an average rate of between 0.73 and 0.98 per cent annually, mainly due to the deterioration of the technological component, which averaged close to −2 per cent between 2011 and 2018. However, contrary to the technological component, the scale component improved every year at an average rate of 1–1.16 per cent, thus cushioning some of the effects of the deteriorating technological component of the TFP. The TFP also posted a one-off positive growth in 2016, following the nationwide implementation of an ‘elective initiative’ programme in the 2015–2016 year, which raised both the scale and efficiency (technical and cost) components to their highest levels. Furthermore, the study also demonstrates the consistency in the effect of scale and technological change components on the TFP under both primal and dual approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2023.2181859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2023.2181859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What drives the productivity growth of New Zealand district health boards: technology, efficiency, or scale?
Using the longitudinal data on New Zealand District Health Boards (DHBs) for the period 2011-2018, the total factor productivity (TFP) change and its components are evaluated using an input distance function and a cost function. The empirical results indicate that TFP decreased at an average rate of between 0.73 and 0.98 per cent annually, mainly due to the deterioration of the technological component, which averaged close to −2 per cent between 2011 and 2018. However, contrary to the technological component, the scale component improved every year at an average rate of 1–1.16 per cent, thus cushioning some of the effects of the deteriorating technological component of the TFP. The TFP also posted a one-off positive growth in 2016, following the nationwide implementation of an ‘elective initiative’ programme in the 2015–2016 year, which raised both the scale and efficiency (technical and cost) components to their highest levels. Furthermore, the study also demonstrates the consistency in the effect of scale and technological change components on the TFP under both primal and dual approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Economic Papers
New Zealand Economic Papers Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信