走向研究议程

IF 0.9 Q4 BUSINESS
David Gilliland
{"title":"走向研究议程","authors":"David Gilliland","doi":"10.1080/26943980.2022.2071580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the launch of the Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships comes the opportunity to assess the interorganizational research domain and provide some introductory thoughts to scholars in the field. My comments come after a strong consideration of the state of the domain and are offered as research questions that might be pursued. While all research questions must be balanced with the demands of data and methodological rigor, it helps to have targets to “solve” the questions in this exciting field raised by practitioners and researchers alike. A key element of any study of inter-organizational relationships is often governance, or the attempts to control dyadic and network partnerships. The study of governance has anchored our most robust (and most mature) theories, such as transaction cost analysis (Rindfleisch & Heide, 1997), agency theory (Eisenhardt, 1988), relational exchange (Macneil, 1980), trust and commitment theory (Morgan & Hunt, 1994), power dependence theory (Frazier et al., 1989), organizational control theory (Ouchi, 1979), and governance theory (Heide, 1994). The understanding and use of these governance theories and others has followed the familiar path of theoretical explication ! quantitative testing ! replication. The result of scholars’ efforts have been broad and substantive understanding of the various aspects of control. Thus, where, from here? In what way might we make significant contributions to the field? To begin to address this over-broad topic, I offer six research questions that may serve as an agenda for investigation.","PeriodicalId":53183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a research agenda\",\"authors\":\"David Gilliland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26943980.2022.2071580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the launch of the Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships comes the opportunity to assess the interorganizational research domain and provide some introductory thoughts to scholars in the field. My comments come after a strong consideration of the state of the domain and are offered as research questions that might be pursued. While all research questions must be balanced with the demands of data and methodological rigor, it helps to have targets to “solve” the questions in this exciting field raised by practitioners and researchers alike. A key element of any study of inter-organizational relationships is often governance, or the attempts to control dyadic and network partnerships. The study of governance has anchored our most robust (and most mature) theories, such as transaction cost analysis (Rindfleisch & Heide, 1997), agency theory (Eisenhardt, 1988), relational exchange (Macneil, 1980), trust and commitment theory (Morgan & Hunt, 1994), power dependence theory (Frazier et al., 1989), organizational control theory (Ouchi, 1979), and governance theory (Heide, 1994). The understanding and use of these governance theories and others has followed the familiar path of theoretical explication ! quantitative testing ! replication. The result of scholars’ efforts have been broad and substantive understanding of the various aspects of control. Thus, where, from here? In what way might we make significant contributions to the field? To begin to address this over-broad topic, I offer six research questions that may serve as an agenda for investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26943980.2022.2071580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26943980.2022.2071580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着《组织间关系杂志》的推出,有机会评估组织间研究领域,并为该领域的学者提供一些介绍性想法。我的评论是在对该领域的状况进行了认真考虑后发表的,并作为可能寻求的研究问题提出。虽然所有的研究问题都必须与数据和方法严谨性的要求相平衡,但有目标来“解决”从业者和研究人员在这个令人兴奋的领域提出的问题是有帮助的。任何组织间关系研究的一个关键要素通常是治理,或控制二元和网络伙伴关系的尝试。治理研究奠定了我们最稳健(也是最成熟)的理论,如交易成本分析(Rindfleisch&Heide,1997)、代理理论(Eisenhardt,1988)、关系交换(Macneil,1980)、信任和承诺理论(Morgan&Hunt,1994)、权力依赖理论(Frazier et al.,1989)、组织控制理论(Ouchi,1979)和治理理论(Heide,1994)。对这些治理理论和其他治理理论的理解和使用遵循了熟悉的理论阐释路径!定量测试!复制。学者们努力的结果是对控制的各个方面有了广泛而实质性的理解。因此,在哪里,从这里?我们可以以何种方式对该领域作出重大贡献?为了开始讨论这个过于宽泛的话题,我提出了六个研究问题,这些问题可以作为调查的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a research agenda
With the launch of the Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships comes the opportunity to assess the interorganizational research domain and provide some introductory thoughts to scholars in the field. My comments come after a strong consideration of the state of the domain and are offered as research questions that might be pursued. While all research questions must be balanced with the demands of data and methodological rigor, it helps to have targets to “solve” the questions in this exciting field raised by practitioners and researchers alike. A key element of any study of inter-organizational relationships is often governance, or the attempts to control dyadic and network partnerships. The study of governance has anchored our most robust (and most mature) theories, such as transaction cost analysis (Rindfleisch & Heide, 1997), agency theory (Eisenhardt, 1988), relational exchange (Macneil, 1980), trust and commitment theory (Morgan & Hunt, 1994), power dependence theory (Frazier et al., 1989), organizational control theory (Ouchi, 1979), and governance theory (Heide, 1994). The understanding and use of these governance theories and others has followed the familiar path of theoretical explication ! quantitative testing ! replication. The result of scholars’ efforts have been broad and substantive understanding of the various aspects of control. Thus, where, from here? In what way might we make significant contributions to the field? To begin to address this over-broad topic, I offer six research questions that may serve as an agenda for investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信