斯洛伐克和捷克共和国的公诉机关:共同的根源,不同的道路(比较法律分析)

IF 0.1 Q4 Social Sciences
Bystrík Šramel
{"title":"斯洛伐克和捷克共和国的公诉机关:共同的根源,不同的道路(比较法律分析)","authors":"Bystrík Šramel","doi":"10.7206/kp.2080-1084.546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public prosecution service has an irreplaceable place in the system of state authori­ ties. However, the years of authoritarian regimes transformed independent public prosecution authorities existing on the territory of Slovakia and the Czech Republic into authorities protecting primarily the regime and persecuting all persons who were non­compliant with this regime. It was not until the fall of Communism in 1989 that a change came – a return to the original mission of public prosecution service (the independent protection of law). However, after the division of the Czechoslovakia in 1993 opinion plurality and the lack of a clear opinion on the nature of the public prosecution service resulted in the creation of two relatively different models – the model of prokuratúra in Slovakia and the model of státní zastupitelství in the Czech Republic. This is the reason why the author of this paper deals with the constitutional status of public prosecution service in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. He analyses public prosecution service as a constitutional institution in general and then by comparison he focuses on constitutional regulation of the Slovak and Czech public prosecution service. The final parts contain brief evalua tion of the current legal status and some possible considerations de constitutione ferenda .","PeriodicalId":36398,"journal":{"name":"Krytyka Prawa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Prosecution Service in Slovakia and in the Czech Republic: Common Roots, Different Paths (A Comparative Legal Analysis)\",\"authors\":\"Bystrík Šramel\",\"doi\":\"10.7206/kp.2080-1084.546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public prosecution service has an irreplaceable place in the system of state authori­ ties. However, the years of authoritarian regimes transformed independent public prosecution authorities existing on the territory of Slovakia and the Czech Republic into authorities protecting primarily the regime and persecuting all persons who were non­compliant with this regime. It was not until the fall of Communism in 1989 that a change came – a return to the original mission of public prosecution service (the independent protection of law). However, after the division of the Czechoslovakia in 1993 opinion plurality and the lack of a clear opinion on the nature of the public prosecution service resulted in the creation of two relatively different models – the model of prokuratúra in Slovakia and the model of státní zastupitelství in the Czech Republic. This is the reason why the author of this paper deals with the constitutional status of public prosecution service in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. He analyses public prosecution service as a constitutional institution in general and then by comparison he focuses on constitutional regulation of the Slovak and Czech public prosecution service. The final parts contain brief evalua tion of the current legal status and some possible considerations de constitutione ferenda .\",\"PeriodicalId\":36398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Krytyka Prawa\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Krytyka Prawa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krytyka Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公诉机关在国家权力体系中具有不可替代的地位。然而,多年的独裁政权将斯洛伐克和捷克共和国境内的独立公诉机关转变为主要保护该政权并迫害所有不遵守该政权的人的机关。直到1989年共产主义垮台,情况才发生了变化——回到了公诉服务的最初使命(法律的独立保护)。然而,在1993年捷克斯洛伐克分裂后,由于对公诉机关的性质缺乏明确的意见,产生了两种相对不同的模式——斯洛伐克的prokuratúra模式和捷克共和国的státnízastubitelství模式。这就是本文作者探讨捷克共和国和斯洛伐克检察机关宪法地位的原因。他分析了公诉机关作为一个宪法机构的总体情况,然后通过比较,他重点关注斯洛伐克和捷克公诉机关的宪法规定。最后部分包括对当前法律地位的简要评估以及对拟议宪法的一些可能考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Prosecution Service in Slovakia and in the Czech Republic: Common Roots, Different Paths (A Comparative Legal Analysis)
Public prosecution service has an irreplaceable place in the system of state authori­ ties. However, the years of authoritarian regimes transformed independent public prosecution authorities existing on the territory of Slovakia and the Czech Republic into authorities protecting primarily the regime and persecuting all persons who were non­compliant with this regime. It was not until the fall of Communism in 1989 that a change came – a return to the original mission of public prosecution service (the independent protection of law). However, after the division of the Czechoslovakia in 1993 opinion plurality and the lack of a clear opinion on the nature of the public prosecution service resulted in the creation of two relatively different models – the model of prokuratúra in Slovakia and the model of státní zastupitelství in the Czech Republic. This is the reason why the author of this paper deals with the constitutional status of public prosecution service in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. He analyses public prosecution service as a constitutional institution in general and then by comparison he focuses on constitutional regulation of the Slovak and Czech public prosecution service. The final parts contain brief evalua tion of the current legal status and some possible considerations de constitutione ferenda .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Krytyka Prawa
Krytyka Prawa Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信