伊本·哈尔杜恩库参观伊凡·哈尔杜恩的故居:Et-Ta'rîf的社会、政治和FikrîKoşullar

Kamuran Gökdağ
{"title":"伊本·哈尔杜恩库参观伊凡·哈尔杜恩的故居:Et-Ta'rîf的社会、政治和FikrîKoşullar","authors":"Kamuran Gökdağ","doi":"10.19059/MUKADDIME.894778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If Ibn Khaldūn’s theory of “man is the child of his habits” is restated into a single concept, most probably the strongest candidate for it will be habitus. Habitus is a concept used by Pierre Bourdieu to describe the sum of the social, political, intellectual and economic backgrounds involved in the existence of the subject, which transforms into a certain disposition in practical relations. This comprehension largely overlaps with Ibn Khaldūn’s understanding of the habits of the subject in a relational context as the established unity of historical dispositions that pass through the habits of the subject but both overcome and precede them. To put it more briefly, the common point of these viewpoints is that they take into account the object share in the subject and the subject share in the object. However, the part that this view would especially like to emphasize by means of this consept and theory is the object share in the subject. Then, what is the object share of Ibn Khaldūn’s own dispositions as a thinker with such understanding? To what extent are functional the relations between subject share and object share in Ibn Khaldūn’s practical and theoretical dispositions? In order to find an answer to these questions, especially the first, this essay investigates how much of Ibn Khaldūn’s dispositions are embedded in the social, political, and intellectual contexts to which he belongs. However, as a more secondary concern, the essay attempts to provide an answer to the second question as well. In this way, on the one hand, the article aims to reveal the traces of these conditions in Ibn Khaldūn’s habits or habitus through the knowledge given by himself in alTa‘rîf, and on the other, it aims to make visible the relationship between his predispositions and theories developed in The Muqaddimah such as mulk, asabiyyah, lineage and generations.","PeriodicalId":31425,"journal":{"name":"Mukaddime","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"İbn Haldûn’un Habitusu’na İbn Haldûncu Bir Ziyaret: Et-Ta‘rîf’teki Sosyal, Siyasî ve Fikrî Koşullar\",\"authors\":\"Kamuran Gökdağ\",\"doi\":\"10.19059/MUKADDIME.894778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If Ibn Khaldūn’s theory of “man is the child of his habits” is restated into a single concept, most probably the strongest candidate for it will be habitus. Habitus is a concept used by Pierre Bourdieu to describe the sum of the social, political, intellectual and economic backgrounds involved in the existence of the subject, which transforms into a certain disposition in practical relations. This comprehension largely overlaps with Ibn Khaldūn’s understanding of the habits of the subject in a relational context as the established unity of historical dispositions that pass through the habits of the subject but both overcome and precede them. To put it more briefly, the common point of these viewpoints is that they take into account the object share in the subject and the subject share in the object. However, the part that this view would especially like to emphasize by means of this consept and theory is the object share in the subject. Then, what is the object share of Ibn Khaldūn’s own dispositions as a thinker with such understanding? To what extent are functional the relations between subject share and object share in Ibn Khaldūn’s practical and theoretical dispositions? In order to find an answer to these questions, especially the first, this essay investigates how much of Ibn Khaldūn’s dispositions are embedded in the social, political, and intellectual contexts to which he belongs. However, as a more secondary concern, the essay attempts to provide an answer to the second question as well. In this way, on the one hand, the article aims to reveal the traces of these conditions in Ibn Khaldūn’s habits or habitus through the knowledge given by himself in alTa‘rîf, and on the other, it aims to make visible the relationship between his predispositions and theories developed in The Muqaddimah such as mulk, asabiyyah, lineage and generations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mukaddime\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mukaddime\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19059/MUKADDIME.894778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mukaddime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19059/MUKADDIME.894778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果伊本·哈立德的“人是习惯的孩子”理论被重述为一个单一的概念,那么最有力的候选者可能是习惯论。习惯是皮埃尔·布迪厄用来描述主体存在所涉及的社会、政治、知识和经济背景的总和,它在实践关系中转化为某种倾向。这种理解在很大程度上与伊本·哈立德对关系背景下主体习惯的理解重叠,即历史倾向的既定统一,这些习惯贯穿主体习惯,但又克服并先于主体习惯。简单地说,这些观点的共同点是,它们考虑了客体在主体中的份额和主体在客体中的份额。然而,这一观点特别想通过这一观点和理论来强调的部分是主体中的客体共享。那么,作为一个具有这种理解力的思想家,伊本·哈立德自己的性格在对象上的份额是多少?在伊本·哈立德的实践和理论倾向中,主体份额和客体份额之间的关系在多大程度上是功能性的?为了找到这些问题的答案,尤其是第一个问题,本文调查了伊本·哈立德的性格在多大程度上嵌入了他所属的社会、政治和知识背景中。然而,作为一个更次要的问题,本文也试图为第二个问题提供答案。通过这种方式,本文一方面旨在通过他在《塔伊夫》中所给予的知识,揭示伊本·哈立德的习惯或习惯中这些条件的痕迹,另一方面,旨在揭示他的倾向与《穆卡迪玛》中发展起来的理论(如mulk、asabiyyah、血统和世代)之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
İbn Haldûn’un Habitusu’na İbn Haldûncu Bir Ziyaret: Et-Ta‘rîf’teki Sosyal, Siyasî ve Fikrî Koşullar
If Ibn Khaldūn’s theory of “man is the child of his habits” is restated into a single concept, most probably the strongest candidate for it will be habitus. Habitus is a concept used by Pierre Bourdieu to describe the sum of the social, political, intellectual and economic backgrounds involved in the existence of the subject, which transforms into a certain disposition in practical relations. This comprehension largely overlaps with Ibn Khaldūn’s understanding of the habits of the subject in a relational context as the established unity of historical dispositions that pass through the habits of the subject but both overcome and precede them. To put it more briefly, the common point of these viewpoints is that they take into account the object share in the subject and the subject share in the object. However, the part that this view would especially like to emphasize by means of this consept and theory is the object share in the subject. Then, what is the object share of Ibn Khaldūn’s own dispositions as a thinker with such understanding? To what extent are functional the relations between subject share and object share in Ibn Khaldūn’s practical and theoretical dispositions? In order to find an answer to these questions, especially the first, this essay investigates how much of Ibn Khaldūn’s dispositions are embedded in the social, political, and intellectual contexts to which he belongs. However, as a more secondary concern, the essay attempts to provide an answer to the second question as well. In this way, on the one hand, the article aims to reveal the traces of these conditions in Ibn Khaldūn’s habits or habitus through the knowledge given by himself in alTa‘rîf, and on the other, it aims to make visible the relationship between his predispositions and theories developed in The Muqaddimah such as mulk, asabiyyah, lineage and generations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信