现金管理的无界多目标模型

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS
Francisco Salas-Molina, J. Rodríguez-Aguilar, D. Plà-Santamaria
{"title":"现金管理的无界多目标模型","authors":"Francisco Salas-Molina, J. Rodríguez-Aguilar, D. Plà-Santamaria","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2018.1456596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cash management models are usually based on a set of bounds that complicate the selection of the optimal policies due to nonlinearity. We here propose to linearize cash management models to guarantee optimality through linear-quadratic multiobjective compromise programming models. We illustrate our approach through a reformulation of the suboptimal state-of-the-art Gormley-Meade’s model to achieve optimality. Furthermore, we introduce a much simpler formulation that we call the boundless model that also provides optimal solutions without using bounds. Results from a sensitivity analysis using real data sets from 54 different companies show that our boundless model is highly robust to cash flow prediction errors.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"63 1","pages":"363 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1456596","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundless multiobjective models for cash management\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Salas-Molina, J. Rodríguez-Aguilar, D. Plà-Santamaria\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2018.1456596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Cash management models are usually based on a set of bounds that complicate the selection of the optimal policies due to nonlinearity. We here propose to linearize cash management models to guarantee optimality through linear-quadratic multiobjective compromise programming models. We illustrate our approach through a reformulation of the suboptimal state-of-the-art Gormley-Meade’s model to achieve optimality. Furthermore, we introduce a much simpler formulation that we call the boundless model that also provides optimal solutions without using bounds. Results from a sensitivity analysis using real data sets from 54 different companies show that our boundless model is highly robust to cash flow prediction errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"363 - 381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1456596\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1456596\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1456596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要现金管理模型通常基于一组边界,由于非线性,这些边界使最优策略的选择变得复杂。我们在这里提出通过线性二次多目标折衷规划模型来线性化现金管理模型以保证最优性。我们通过重新制定最先进的次优Gormley-Mede模型来说明我们的方法,以实现最优性。此外,我们引入了一个更简单的公式,我们称之为无限模型,它也提供了不使用边界的最优解。使用来自54家不同公司的真实数据集进行的敏感性分析结果表明,我们的无限模型对现金流预测误差具有高度鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boundless multiobjective models for cash management
ABSTRACT Cash management models are usually based on a set of bounds that complicate the selection of the optimal policies due to nonlinearity. We here propose to linearize cash management models to guarantee optimality through linear-quadratic multiobjective compromise programming models. We illustrate our approach through a reformulation of the suboptimal state-of-the-art Gormley-Meade’s model to achieve optimality. Furthermore, we introduce a much simpler formulation that we call the boundless model that also provides optimal solutions without using bounds. Results from a sensitivity analysis using real data sets from 54 different companies show that our boundless model is highly robust to cash flow prediction errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Economist
Engineering Economist ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment. The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信