Satrap石碑：一种中庸之道

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY

Journal of Egyptian History Pub Date : 2017-04-11 DOI:10.1163/18741665-12340034

G. Gorre

{"title":"Satrap石碑：一种中庸之道","authors":"G. Gorre","doi":"10.1163/18741665-12340034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the relevance of the Middle Ground theory for the study of relationships between the Egyptian priesthood and the Macedonian kings. This concept will then be applied to the interpretation of one document in particular, the Satrap Stela. It suggests that the Middle Ground concept allows the identification of the Persian ruler mentioned in the document as Xerxes, Great King of the Second Persian Wars, and supports an interpretation of the text centered on Ptolemy Satrap rather than Khababash.","PeriodicalId":41016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Egyptian History","volume":"10 1","pages":"51-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18741665-12340034","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Satrap Stela: A Middle Ground Approach\",\"authors\":\"G. Gorre\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18741665-12340034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the relevance of the Middle Ground theory for the study of relationships between the Egyptian priesthood and the Macedonian kings. This concept will then be applied to the interpretation of one document in particular, the Satrap Stela. It suggests that the Middle Ground concept allows the identification of the Persian ruler mentioned in the document as Xerxes, Great King of the Second Persian Wars, and supports an interpretation of the text centered on Ptolemy Satrap rather than Khababash.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Egyptian History\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"51-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18741665-12340034\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Egyptian History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Egyptian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

摘要

本文探讨了中间地带理论对研究埃及祭司和马其顿国王之间关系的相关性。然后，这一概念将适用于一份文件的解释，特别是Satrap Stela。它表明，“中间地带”概念允许将文件中提到的波斯统治者识别为第二次波斯战争的伟大国王薛西斯，并支持对以托勒密·萨特拉普而非哈巴什为中心的文本的解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Satrap Stela: A Middle Ground Approach

This article explores the relevance of the Middle Ground theory for the study of relationships between the Egyptian priesthood and the Macedonian kings. This concept will then be applied to the interpretation of one document in particular, the Satrap Stela. It suggests that the Middle Ground concept allows the identification of the Persian ruler mentioned in the document as Xerxes, Great King of the Second Persian Wars, and supports an interpretation of the text centered on Ptolemy Satrap rather than Khababash.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Egyptian History HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

42.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Egyptian History (JEgH) aims to encourage and stimulate a focused debate on writing and interpreting Egyptian history ranging from the Neolithic foundations of Ancient Egypt to its modern reception. It covers all aspects of Ancient Egyptian history (political, social, economic, and intellectual) and of modern historiography about Ancient Egypt (methodologies, hermeneutics, interplay between historiography and other disciplines, and history of modern Egyptological historiography). The journal is open to contributions in English, German, and French.