伊恩·辛克莱,威廉·布莱克与20世纪60年代的幻想诗歌

J. Riley
{"title":"伊恩·辛克莱,威廉·布莱克与20世纪60年代的幻想诗歌","authors":"J. Riley","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the use made of William Blake by a range of writers\n associated with the ‘countercultural’ milieu of the 1960s,\n particularly those linked to its London-based literary context. Iain Sinclair is\n offered as a writer who, in his appreciation of Blake, stands apart from the\n poets linked to the anthology, Children of Albion (1969). The\n article unpacks this distinction, analysing Sinclair’s\n ‘topographic’ take in comparison to the ‘visionary’\n mode of his contemporaries. Having established this dualism, the argument then\n questions the nature of the visionary poetics assumed to apply to the likes of\n key poets from the era. The work of Michael Horovitz is brought into view, as is\n that of Harry Fainlight. In essence, these multiple discourses point to the\n plurality of Blake as a figure of influence and the variation underpinning his\n literary utility in post-1960s poetry.","PeriodicalId":80816,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iain Sinclair, William Blake and the Visionary Poetry of the 1960s\",\"authors\":\"J. Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the use made of William Blake by a range of writers\\n associated with the ‘countercultural’ milieu of the 1960s,\\n particularly those linked to its London-based literary context. Iain Sinclair is\\n offered as a writer who, in his appreciation of Blake, stands apart from the\\n poets linked to the anthology, Children of Albion (1969). The\\n article unpacks this distinction, analysing Sinclair’s\\n ‘topographic’ take in comparison to the ‘visionary’\\n mode of his contemporaries. Having established this dualism, the argument then\\n questions the nature of the visionary poetics assumed to apply to the likes of\\n key poets from the era. The work of Michael Horovitz is brought into view, as is\\n that of Harry Fainlight. In essence, these multiple discourses point to the\\n plurality of Blake as a figure of influence and the variation underpinning his\\n literary utility in post-1960s poetry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了一系列与20世纪60年代“反文化”环境有关的作家对威廉布莱克的使用,特别是那些与伦敦文学背景有关的作家。伊恩·辛克莱(Iain Sinclair)是一位作家,在他对布莱克的欣赏中,他与文集《阿尔比恩的孩子》(1969)中的诗人区别开来。本文剖析了这一区别,分析了辛克莱的“地形”模式与他同时代的“幻想”模式的比较。在确立了这种二元论之后,该论点接着质疑了幻想诗学的本质,这种诗学被认为适用于那个时代的关键诗人。迈克尔·霍洛维茨(Michael Horovitz)和哈利·费恩莱特(Harry Fainlight)的作品被带进了人们的视野。从本质上讲,这些多重话语指出了布莱克作为一个有影响力的人物的多元性,以及支撑他在20世纪60年代后诗歌中的文学效用的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iain Sinclair, William Blake and the Visionary Poetry of the 1960s
This article considers the use made of William Blake by a range of writers associated with the ‘countercultural’ milieu of the 1960s, particularly those linked to its London-based literary context. Iain Sinclair is offered as a writer who, in his appreciation of Blake, stands apart from the poets linked to the anthology, Children of Albion (1969). The article unpacks this distinction, analysing Sinclair’s ‘topographic’ take in comparison to the ‘visionary’ mode of his contemporaries. Having established this dualism, the argument then questions the nature of the visionary poetics assumed to apply to the likes of key poets from the era. The work of Michael Horovitz is brought into view, as is that of Harry Fainlight. In essence, these multiple discourses point to the plurality of Blake as a figure of influence and the variation underpinning his literary utility in post-1960s poetry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信