俄勒冈州森林部门的跨部门合作:来自所有者和首席执行官的见解

IF 1.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
J. E. Guerrero, E. Hansen
{"title":"俄勒冈州森林部门的跨部门合作:来自所有者和首席执行官的见解","authors":"J. E. Guerrero, E. Hansen","doi":"10.1080/20426445.2021.1889164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cross-sector collaboration is emphasized as a means for forest sector companies to remain competitive in a global marketplace that is evolving toward greater use of bio-based products (bioeconomy). Nevertheless, questions remain regarding how companies can identify and develop innovations via cross-sector collaboration. This study addresses the potential of Oregon forest sector companies to collaborate with other sectors. Results show interest in collaboration among leaders of Oregon companies, given expectations of knowledge acquisition, increased capacity for innovation, and enhanced profitability. However, leaders describe a hesitancy within their companies as well as a host of changes that must take place before collaboration is likely. Suggestions include generational changes of leadership, more specialized employees, and building trust with potential partners. A traditional, conservative industry/company culture was the key barrier to collaboration. Despite opportunities promised by cross-sector collaboration, considerable development within companies is likely needed before cross-sector collaboration opportunities can be capitalized on.","PeriodicalId":14414,"journal":{"name":"International Wood Products Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20426445.2021.1889164","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-sector collaboration in Oregon’s forest sector: insights from owners and CEOs\",\"authors\":\"J. E. Guerrero, E. Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20426445.2021.1889164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Cross-sector collaboration is emphasized as a means for forest sector companies to remain competitive in a global marketplace that is evolving toward greater use of bio-based products (bioeconomy). Nevertheless, questions remain regarding how companies can identify and develop innovations via cross-sector collaboration. This study addresses the potential of Oregon forest sector companies to collaborate with other sectors. Results show interest in collaboration among leaders of Oregon companies, given expectations of knowledge acquisition, increased capacity for innovation, and enhanced profitability. However, leaders describe a hesitancy within their companies as well as a host of changes that must take place before collaboration is likely. Suggestions include generational changes of leadership, more specialized employees, and building trust with potential partners. A traditional, conservative industry/company culture was the key barrier to collaboration. Despite opportunities promised by cross-sector collaboration, considerable development within companies is likely needed before cross-sector collaboration opportunities can be capitalized on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Wood Products Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20426445.2021.1889164\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Wood Products Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2021.1889164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wood Products Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2021.1889164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要跨部门合作被强调为森林部门公司在全球市场中保持竞争力的一种手段,该市场正朝着更多地使用生物产品(生物经济)的方向发展。然而,关于公司如何通过跨部门合作来识别和开发创新,仍然存在问题。这项研究探讨了俄勒冈州森林部门公司与其他部门合作的潜力。结果显示,考虑到对知识获取、创新能力提高和盈利能力提高的期望,俄勒冈州公司领导人对合作感兴趣。然而,领导者们描述了他们公司内部的犹豫,以及在可能进行合作之前必须进行的一系列变革。建议包括领导层的代际变革、更专业的员工以及与潜在合作伙伴建立信任。传统、保守的行业/公司文化是合作的主要障碍。尽管跨部门合作承诺了机会,但在利用跨部门合作机会之前,公司内部可能需要相当大的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-sector collaboration in Oregon’s forest sector: insights from owners and CEOs
ABSTRACT Cross-sector collaboration is emphasized as a means for forest sector companies to remain competitive in a global marketplace that is evolving toward greater use of bio-based products (bioeconomy). Nevertheless, questions remain regarding how companies can identify and develop innovations via cross-sector collaboration. This study addresses the potential of Oregon forest sector companies to collaborate with other sectors. Results show interest in collaboration among leaders of Oregon companies, given expectations of knowledge acquisition, increased capacity for innovation, and enhanced profitability. However, leaders describe a hesitancy within their companies as well as a host of changes that must take place before collaboration is likely. Suggestions include generational changes of leadership, more specialized employees, and building trust with potential partners. A traditional, conservative industry/company culture was the key barrier to collaboration. Despite opportunities promised by cross-sector collaboration, considerable development within companies is likely needed before cross-sector collaboration opportunities can be capitalized on.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Wood Products Journal
International Wood Products Journal MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信