匈牙利为确定新的最大允许N剂量值而进行的现场试验结果

IF 0.9 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
B. Pirkó, S. Koós, J. Szabó, L. Radimszky, P. Csathó, T. Árendás, N. Fodor, A. Szabó
{"title":"匈牙利为确定新的最大允许N剂量值而进行的现场试验结果","authors":"B. Pirkó, S. Koós, J. Szabó, L. Radimszky, P. Csathó, T. Árendás, N. Fodor, A. Szabó","doi":"10.7896/j.2036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"based on an agronomic approach, Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) and an economic approach. In terms of the agronomic evaluation, no clear differences were found between treatments: the highest yields were obtained in respect of different treatments at the three experimental sites, but the differences were not significant. From the point of view of NUE, the N max experiment on the Nagyhörcsök calcareous chernozem soil showed the highest values, which, according to the EU N Expert Panel (EUNEP), are already in the unfavourable soil depletion range. From the economic point of view, there was no significant difference in net profits between the Present and New planned N max values. The EUNEP approach also confirms the need to increase N max values in order to decrease the potential for soil depletion. However, with a view to establishing the final optimum range for the EUNEP, it seems necessary to take into account economic considerations as well, especially regarding the financial conditions of Central and Eastern European countries.","PeriodicalId":44547,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of Hungarian field test trials set up for establishing new maximum permitted N dose values\",\"authors\":\"B. Pirkó, S. Koós, J. Szabó, L. Radimszky, P. Csathó, T. Árendás, N. Fodor, A. Szabó\",\"doi\":\"10.7896/j.2036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"based on an agronomic approach, Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) and an economic approach. In terms of the agronomic evaluation, no clear differences were found between treatments: the highest yields were obtained in respect of different treatments at the three experimental sites, but the differences were not significant. From the point of view of NUE, the N max experiment on the Nagyhörcsök calcareous chernozem soil showed the highest values, which, according to the EU N Expert Panel (EUNEP), are already in the unfavourable soil depletion range. From the economic point of view, there was no significant difference in net profits between the Present and New planned N max values. The EUNEP approach also confirms the need to increase N max values in order to decrease the potential for soil depletion. However, with a view to establishing the final optimum range for the EUNEP, it seems necessary to take into account economic considerations as well, especially regarding the financial conditions of Central and Eastern European countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于农学方法、氮利用效率(NUE)和经济方法。在农艺评价方面,处理之间没有发现明显的差异:在三个试验点,不同处理的产量最高,但差异不显著。从NUE的角度来看,Nagyhörcsök钙质黑钙土的N max实验显示出最高值,根据欧盟N专家小组(EUNEP)的说法,该值已经处于不利的土壤耗竭范围内。从经济角度来看,当前和新计划的N最大值之间的净利润没有显著差异。EUNEP方法还证实了增加N最大值的必要性,以降低土壤流失的可能性。然而,为了确定欧盟国家环境政策的最终最佳范围,似乎也有必要考虑到经济因素,特别是中欧和东欧国家的财政状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of Hungarian field test trials set up for establishing new maximum permitted N dose values
based on an agronomic approach, Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) and an economic approach. In terms of the agronomic evaluation, no clear differences were found between treatments: the highest yields were obtained in respect of different treatments at the three experimental sites, but the differences were not significant. From the point of view of NUE, the N max experiment on the Nagyhörcsök calcareous chernozem soil showed the highest values, which, according to the EU N Expert Panel (EUNEP), are already in the unfavourable soil depletion range. From the economic point of view, there was no significant difference in net profits between the Present and New planned N max values. The EUNEP approach also confirms the need to increase N max values in order to decrease the potential for soil depletion. However, with a view to establishing the final optimum range for the EUNEP, it seems necessary to take into account economic considerations as well, especially regarding the financial conditions of Central and Eastern European countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Agricultural Economics
Studies in Agricultural Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信