库中词汇控制评价模型的系统化:与Unesp机构库的研究报告

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Mariângela Fugita
{"title":"库中词汇控制评价模型的系统化:与Unesp机构库的研究报告","authors":"Mariângela Fugita","doi":"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8668751/29237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Vocabulary control in information resource storage, treatment and retrieval systems is necessary to obtain consistency between indexing and retrieval in order to avoid informational dispersion. Digital repositories in universities are currently fundamentalin the organization and management of knowledge generated by scientific, technological, artistic, and administrative production, however, it is necessary to verify the availability of controlled vocabulary and how vocabulary control is carried out. Objective: With the objective of systematizing a proposal for vocabulary control and the use of controlled vocabularies in university repositories managed by libraries, an evaluation model was developed that proposes to systematize methods, procedures, resources, and techniques. Methodology: For this, the development of the investigation carried out exploratory research with bibliographic and documentary research and applied research in the Unesp Repository. Results: The results obtained constituted an Action Plan, discussed and elaborated by the Study Group, composed of six actions and nine studies to evaluate and control vocabulary in university repositories about: vocabulary control in indexing by professionals and non-professionals; vocabulary control in retrieval; use of subject metadata from academic papers; keyword matching; analysis of terminological variations at semantic, syntactic and pragmatic levels; analysis of transaction logs for searches by subject. Conclusion: Itis concluded that the systematization of actions in an evaluation model is relevant for university repositories to incorporate the advances offered by vocabulary control in their routines and, mainly, for the contribution of new terms arising from scientific and technological evolution.","PeriodicalId":36988,"journal":{"name":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematization of the evaluation model of vocabulary control in repositories: research report with the Unesp Institutional Repository\",\"authors\":\"Mariângela Fugita\",\"doi\":\"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8668751/29237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Vocabulary control in information resource storage, treatment and retrieval systems is necessary to obtain consistency between indexing and retrieval in order to avoid informational dispersion. Digital repositories in universities are currently fundamentalin the organization and management of knowledge generated by scientific, technological, artistic, and administrative production, however, it is necessary to verify the availability of controlled vocabulary and how vocabulary control is carried out. Objective: With the objective of systematizing a proposal for vocabulary control and the use of controlled vocabularies in university repositories managed by libraries, an evaluation model was developed that proposes to systematize methods, procedures, resources, and techniques. Methodology: For this, the development of the investigation carried out exploratory research with bibliographic and documentary research and applied research in the Unesp Repository. Results: The results obtained constituted an Action Plan, discussed and elaborated by the Study Group, composed of six actions and nine studies to evaluate and control vocabulary in university repositories about: vocabulary control in indexing by professionals and non-professionals; vocabulary control in retrieval; use of subject metadata from academic papers; keyword matching; analysis of terminological variations at semantic, syntactic and pragmatic levels; analysis of transaction logs for searches by subject. Conclusion: Itis concluded that the systematization of actions in an evaluation model is relevant for university repositories to incorporate the advances offered by vocabulary control in their routines and, mainly, for the contribution of new terms arising from scientific and technological evolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8668751/29237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8668751/29237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:信息资源存储、处理和检索系统中的词汇控制是必要的,以获得索引和检索之间的一致性,从而避免信息分散。目前,大学中的数字存储库是组织和管理科学、技术、艺术和行政生产产生的知识的基础,然而,有必要验证受控词汇的可用性以及词汇控制是如何进行的。目的:为了系统化图书馆管理的大学知识库中词汇控制和受控词汇使用的建议,开发了一个评估模型,该模型建议将方法、程序、资源和技术系统化。方法论:为此,调查的发展通过文献和文献研究以及联合国教科文组织知识库中的应用研究进行了探索性研究。结果:所获得的结果构成了一项行动计划,由研究小组讨论和阐述,由六项行动和九项研究组成,以评估和控制大学知识库中的词汇:专业人员和非专业人员在索引中的词汇控制;检索中的词汇控制;使用学术论文中的主题元数据;关键词匹配;从语义、句法和语用三个层面分析术语变异;按主题分析用于搜索的事务日志。结论:评估模型中行动的系统化与大学知识库将词汇控制提供的进步纳入日常工作有关,主要是与科技进步产生的新术语的贡献有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematization of the evaluation model of vocabulary control in repositories: research report with the Unesp Institutional Repository
Introduction: Vocabulary control in information resource storage, treatment and retrieval systems is necessary to obtain consistency between indexing and retrieval in order to avoid informational dispersion. Digital repositories in universities are currently fundamentalin the organization and management of knowledge generated by scientific, technological, artistic, and administrative production, however, it is necessary to verify the availability of controlled vocabulary and how vocabulary control is carried out. Objective: With the objective of systematizing a proposal for vocabulary control and the use of controlled vocabularies in university repositories managed by libraries, an evaluation model was developed that proposes to systematize methods, procedures, resources, and techniques. Methodology: For this, the development of the investigation carried out exploratory research with bibliographic and documentary research and applied research in the Unesp Repository. Results: The results obtained constituted an Action Plan, discussed and elaborated by the Study Group, composed of six actions and nine studies to evaluate and control vocabulary in university repositories about: vocabulary control in indexing by professionals and non-professionals; vocabulary control in retrieval; use of subject metadata from academic papers; keyword matching; analysis of terminological variations at semantic, syntactic and pragmatic levels; analysis of transaction logs for searches by subject. Conclusion: Itis concluded that the systematization of actions in an evaluation model is relevant for university repositories to incorporate the advances offered by vocabulary control in their routines and, mainly, for the contribution of new terms arising from scientific and technological evolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信