T. Kashner, Christopher Clarke, D. Aron, John M. Byrne, G. Cannon, D. Deemer, S. Gilman, C. Kaminetzky, L. Loo, Sophia Li, Annie B. Wicker, S. Keitz
{"title":"认知调查的9项标准评估框架——以弗吉尼亚大学学生认知调查为例","authors":"T. Kashner, Christopher Clarke, D. Aron, John M. Byrne, G. Cannon, D. Deemer, S. Gilman, C. Kaminetzky, L. Loo, Sophia Li, Annie B. Wicker, S. Keitz","doi":"10.1080/24709360.2018.1553362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For its clinical, epidemiologic, educational, and health services research, evaluation, administrative, regulatory, and accreditation purposes, the perceptions survey is a data collection tool that asks observers to describe perceptions of their experiences with a defined phenomenon of interest. In practice, these surveys are often subject to criticism for not having been thoroughly evaluated before its first application using a consistent and comprehensive set of criteria for validity and reliability. This paper introduces a 9-criteria framework to assess perceptions surveys that integrates criteria from multiple evaluation sources. The 9-criteria framework was applied to data from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Learners’ Perceptions Survey (LPS) that had been administered to national and local samples, and from findings obtained through a literature review involving LPS survey data. We show that the LPS is a robust tool that may serve as a model for design and validation of other perceptions surveys. Findings underscore the importance of using all nine criteria to validate perceptions survey data.","PeriodicalId":37240,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":"4 1","pages":"140 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24709360.2018.1553362","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 9-criteria evaluation framework for perceptions survey: the case of VA’s Learners’ Perceptions Survey\",\"authors\":\"T. Kashner, Christopher Clarke, D. Aron, John M. Byrne, G. Cannon, D. Deemer, S. Gilman, C. Kaminetzky, L. Loo, Sophia Li, Annie B. Wicker, S. Keitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24709360.2018.1553362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT For its clinical, epidemiologic, educational, and health services research, evaluation, administrative, regulatory, and accreditation purposes, the perceptions survey is a data collection tool that asks observers to describe perceptions of their experiences with a defined phenomenon of interest. In practice, these surveys are often subject to criticism for not having been thoroughly evaluated before its first application using a consistent and comprehensive set of criteria for validity and reliability. This paper introduces a 9-criteria framework to assess perceptions surveys that integrates criteria from multiple evaluation sources. The 9-criteria framework was applied to data from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Learners’ Perceptions Survey (LPS) that had been administered to national and local samples, and from findings obtained through a literature review involving LPS survey data. We show that the LPS is a robust tool that may serve as a model for design and validation of other perceptions surveys. Findings underscore the importance of using all nine criteria to validate perceptions survey data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"140 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24709360.2018.1553362\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1553362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1553362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The 9-criteria evaluation framework for perceptions survey: the case of VA’s Learners’ Perceptions Survey
ABSTRACT For its clinical, epidemiologic, educational, and health services research, evaluation, administrative, regulatory, and accreditation purposes, the perceptions survey is a data collection tool that asks observers to describe perceptions of their experiences with a defined phenomenon of interest. In practice, these surveys are often subject to criticism for not having been thoroughly evaluated before its first application using a consistent and comprehensive set of criteria for validity and reliability. This paper introduces a 9-criteria framework to assess perceptions surveys that integrates criteria from multiple evaluation sources. The 9-criteria framework was applied to data from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Learners’ Perceptions Survey (LPS) that had been administered to national and local samples, and from findings obtained through a literature review involving LPS survey data. We show that the LPS is a robust tool that may serve as a model for design and validation of other perceptions surveys. Findings underscore the importance of using all nine criteria to validate perceptions survey data.