新冠肺炎、种族主义和“例外状态”?在“科罗纳”时代及以后,神学与身份和人权的伦理接触

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Prof. D.A. Forster, Acta Theologica, Biopolitics Bio-politiek
{"title":"新冠肺炎、种族主义和“例外状态”?在“科罗纳”时代及以后,神学与身份和人权的伦理接触","authors":"Prof. D.A. Forster, Acta Theologica, Biopolitics Bio-politiek","doi":"10.38140/at.v43i1.7084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role that religion and politics play at the intersection with individual and social rights. Religiously informed political actors capitalised on fears and prejudices to further science denialism, normalise nationalist ideologies, and curtail human rights. In the United States of America, Brazil, and South Africa, it took the form of problematic political theologies. In many instances, a state of exception, as understood in the work of Giorgio Agamben, was enacted. Such actions often have biopolitical significance revolving around making political choices informed by religious beliefs that impact on individual bodies and social freedoms. This extends from individual bodies tosocieties. This research employs a qualitative literature approach to investigate the intersection of political and theological beliefs during the pandemic. It highlights the impact of populist political theologies on the erosion of democracy and human rights in countries that have highly religious populations. It is argued that these strategies reach beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":39489,"journal":{"name":"Acta Theologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19, racism and the ‘state of exception’? A theological ethical engagement with identity and human rights in an age of ‘Corona’ and beyond\",\"authors\":\"Prof. D.A. Forster, Acta Theologica, Biopolitics Bio-politiek\",\"doi\":\"10.38140/at.v43i1.7084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role that religion and politics play at the intersection with individual and social rights. Religiously informed political actors capitalised on fears and prejudices to further science denialism, normalise nationalist ideologies, and curtail human rights. In the United States of America, Brazil, and South Africa, it took the form of problematic political theologies. In many instances, a state of exception, as understood in the work of Giorgio Agamben, was enacted. Such actions often have biopolitical significance revolving around making political choices informed by religious beliefs that impact on individual bodies and social freedoms. This extends from individual bodies tosocieties. This research employs a qualitative literature approach to investigate the intersection of political and theological beliefs during the pandemic. It highlights the impact of populist political theologies on the erosion of democracy and human rights in countries that have highly religious populations. It is argued that these strategies reach beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Theologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Theologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v43i1.7084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Theologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v43i1.7084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎大流行突出了宗教和政治在个人和社会权利交叉点上的作用。宗教知情的政治行为者利用恐惧和偏见进一步否认科学,使民族主义意识形态正常化,并限制人权。在美利坚合众国、巴西和南非,它采取了有问题的政治神学的形式。在许多情况下,乔治·阿甘本的作品中所理解的例外状态被制定。这种行动通常具有生物政治意义,围绕着根据影响个人身体和社会自由的宗教信仰做出政治选择。这从个体延伸到社会。这项研究采用了定性文献的方法来调查疫情期间政治和神学信仰的交叉。它强调了民粹主义政治神学对宗教人口众多的国家民主和人权侵蚀的影响。有人认为,这些战略超越了新冠肺炎大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Covid-19, racism and the ‘state of exception’? A theological ethical engagement with identity and human rights in an age of ‘Corona’ and beyond
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role that religion and politics play at the intersection with individual and social rights. Religiously informed political actors capitalised on fears and prejudices to further science denialism, normalise nationalist ideologies, and curtail human rights. In the United States of America, Brazil, and South Africa, it took the form of problematic political theologies. In many instances, a state of exception, as understood in the work of Giorgio Agamben, was enacted. Such actions often have biopolitical significance revolving around making political choices informed by religious beliefs that impact on individual bodies and social freedoms. This extends from individual bodies tosocieties. This research employs a qualitative literature approach to investigate the intersection of political and theological beliefs during the pandemic. It highlights the impact of populist political theologies on the erosion of democracy and human rights in countries that have highly religious populations. It is argued that these strategies reach beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Theologica
Acta Theologica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Theologica is the official and accredited theological journal of the Faculty of Theology of the University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信