整体式桥台概述:当前做法、现场监测和桥面更换措施

IF 0.7 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
R. Vasconez, Aliaksei Kustau, H. Najm
{"title":"整体式桥台概述:当前做法、现场监测和桥面更换措施","authors":"R. Vasconez, Aliaksei Kustau, H. Najm","doi":"10.3233/brs-220196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of integral abutments in bridges goes back many years to the late 1930’s in the United States. Over the years, integral bridges became more popular as more and more states built those bridges and more engineers became familiar with their design and construction. These bridges are being built in Europe since the 1980’s. An integral abutment bridge acts as a frame structure with a continuity connection between the superstructure and the substructure. The substructure is typically an integral cap supported on single row of piles that provides flexibility to accommodate thermal loads and displacements. The main advantage of integral abutment bridges is that they are built without expansion joints which eliminates maintenance costs and reduces construction costs. Because of the interaction between the soil and the integral abutment under the applied loads and the cyclic nature of thermal loads, the analysis and design of integral abutment bridges can be, in some cases, challenging especially when the designs falls outside the geometrical limits set by existing standards. This overview focus on field performance data reported in the literature and interpretation of this data. IT also highlights the needs for more test data during construction and for long term performance under cyclic thermal movements. Deck replacement requirements in integral abutments were investigated using analytical models and recommendations for deck replacement preparations are provided.","PeriodicalId":43279,"journal":{"name":"Bridge Structures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An overview of integral abutments: Current practices, field monitoring and deck replacement measures\",\"authors\":\"R. Vasconez, Aliaksei Kustau, H. Najm\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/brs-220196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of integral abutments in bridges goes back many years to the late 1930’s in the United States. Over the years, integral bridges became more popular as more and more states built those bridges and more engineers became familiar with their design and construction. These bridges are being built in Europe since the 1980’s. An integral abutment bridge acts as a frame structure with a continuity connection between the superstructure and the substructure. The substructure is typically an integral cap supported on single row of piles that provides flexibility to accommodate thermal loads and displacements. The main advantage of integral abutment bridges is that they are built without expansion joints which eliminates maintenance costs and reduces construction costs. Because of the interaction between the soil and the integral abutment under the applied loads and the cyclic nature of thermal loads, the analysis and design of integral abutment bridges can be, in some cases, challenging especially when the designs falls outside the geometrical limits set by existing standards. This overview focus on field performance data reported in the literature and interpretation of this data. IT also highlights the needs for more test data during construction and for long term performance under cyclic thermal movements. Deck replacement requirements in integral abutments were investigated using analytical models and recommendations for deck replacement preparations are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bridge Structures\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bridge Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/brs-220196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bridge Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/brs-220196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

整体桥台在桥梁中的使用可以追溯到20世纪30年代末的美国。多年来,随着越来越多的州建造了整体式桥梁,越来越多的工程师熟悉了整体式桥梁的设计和施工,整体式桥梁变得越来越流行。这些桥梁从20世纪80年代开始在欧洲建造。整体桥台桥作为框架结构,在上部结构和下部结构之间具有连续性连接。下部结构通常是一个由单排桩支撑的整体承台,提供了适应热载荷和位移的灵活性。整体式桥台桥梁的主要优点是没有伸缩缝,省去了维修费用,降低了施工成本。由于在荷载作用下土壤和整体桥台之间的相互作用以及热荷载的循环性质,整体桥台桥梁的分析和设计在某些情况下可能具有挑战性,特别是当设计超出现有标准设定的几何限制时。本综述主要关注文献中报道的现场性能数据以及对这些数据的解释。IT还强调了在施工过程中需要更多的测试数据,以及在循环热运动下的长期性能。利用分析模型对整体式桥台的甲板更换要求进行了研究,并对甲板更换准备工作提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An overview of integral abutments: Current practices, field monitoring and deck replacement measures
The use of integral abutments in bridges goes back many years to the late 1930’s in the United States. Over the years, integral bridges became more popular as more and more states built those bridges and more engineers became familiar with their design and construction. These bridges are being built in Europe since the 1980’s. An integral abutment bridge acts as a frame structure with a continuity connection between the superstructure and the substructure. The substructure is typically an integral cap supported on single row of piles that provides flexibility to accommodate thermal loads and displacements. The main advantage of integral abutment bridges is that they are built without expansion joints which eliminates maintenance costs and reduces construction costs. Because of the interaction between the soil and the integral abutment under the applied loads and the cyclic nature of thermal loads, the analysis and design of integral abutment bridges can be, in some cases, challenging especially when the designs falls outside the geometrical limits set by existing standards. This overview focus on field performance data reported in the literature and interpretation of this data. IT also highlights the needs for more test data during construction and for long term performance under cyclic thermal movements. Deck replacement requirements in integral abutments were investigated using analytical models and recommendations for deck replacement preparations are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bridge Structures
Bridge Structures CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信