{"title":"下肢假肢套结构和材料性能的力学测试范围综述","authors":"Gila Baer, S. Fatone","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Lower-limb amputations account for most cases seen by certified prosthetists in the United States. Fundamental to the success of a lower-limb prosthesis is the socket, and fundamental to the success of a socket is safety and durability. Currently, there are no standards specific to ensuring the safety and durability of lower-limb prosthetic sockets. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the mechanical testing procedures used to date to assess the structural and material properties of lower-limb prosthetic sockets, with a view to informing the development of future standards. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus databases and the Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal website to identify relevant articles. Articles published in English were included if they used mechanical testing to assess the socket and/or socket material and presented those test results. Results Fourteen articles were included in this review. They described 30 different mechanical test protocols, consisting of 12 different types of mechanical tests. The most common mechanical tests conducted were tensile, static load, and cyclic load testing. Of the 30 test protocols, 20 referenced current standards that do not include sockets within their scope and modified them in various ways to allow testing of sockets. Of the 14 included articles, 8 described using a mock residual limb during testing, all of which were unique in their composition. Conclusion Individual researchers modified existing, nonsocket standards in varying ways to adopt them for use in testing lower-limb prosthetic sockets. This scoping review describes information that may inform the development of socket-specific test protocols. Clinical Relevance Future research is needed to determine which tests are good indicators of clinical safety and durability in order to link quantitative results of mechanical testing to the safety and durability of everyday socket use.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"35 1","pages":"e37 - e47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping Review of Mechanical Testing of the Structural and Material Properties of Lower-Limb Prosthetic Sockets\",\"authors\":\"Gila Baer, S. Fatone\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Lower-limb amputations account for most cases seen by certified prosthetists in the United States. Fundamental to the success of a lower-limb prosthesis is the socket, and fundamental to the success of a socket is safety and durability. Currently, there are no standards specific to ensuring the safety and durability of lower-limb prosthetic sockets. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the mechanical testing procedures used to date to assess the structural and material properties of lower-limb prosthetic sockets, with a view to informing the development of future standards. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus databases and the Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal website to identify relevant articles. Articles published in English were included if they used mechanical testing to assess the socket and/or socket material and presented those test results. Results Fourteen articles were included in this review. They described 30 different mechanical test protocols, consisting of 12 different types of mechanical tests. The most common mechanical tests conducted were tensile, static load, and cyclic load testing. Of the 30 test protocols, 20 referenced current standards that do not include sockets within their scope and modified them in various ways to allow testing of sockets. Of the 14 included articles, 8 described using a mock residual limb during testing, all of which were unique in their composition. Conclusion Individual researchers modified existing, nonsocket standards in varying ways to adopt them for use in testing lower-limb prosthetic sockets. This scoping review describes information that may inform the development of socket-specific test protocols. Clinical Relevance Future research is needed to determine which tests are good indicators of clinical safety and durability in order to link quantitative results of mechanical testing to the safety and durability of everyday socket use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"e37 - e47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要简介:在美国,下肢截肢占认证假肢医生所见病例的大多数。下肢假体成功的基础是关节窝,而关节窝成功的基础是安全性和耐久性。目前,还没有专门的标准来保证下肢假肢插座的安全性和耐用性。本综述的目的是描述迄今为止用于评估下肢假肢窝结构和材料特性的机械测试程序,以期为未来标准的制定提供信息。方法系统检索PubMed、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Scopus数据库和Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal网站的相关文章。用英文发表的文章,如果使用机械测试来评估插座和/或插座材料,并提供这些测试结果,则包括在内。结果共纳入14篇文献。他们描述了30种不同的机械测试方案,包括12种不同类型的机械测试。最常见的机械试验是拉伸、静载荷和循环载荷试验。在30个测试协议中,有20个参考了现行标准,这些标准不包括套接字,并以各种方式对其进行了修改,以允许对套接字进行测试。在纳入的14篇文章中,有8篇描述了在测试期间使用模拟残肢,所有这些文章在组成上都是独一无二的。结论个别研究者以不同的方式修改了现有的非关节套标准,将其用于下肢假肢关节套的测试。此范围审查描述了可能告知开发特定于套接字的测试协议的信息。为了将机械测试的定量结果与日常插座使用的安全性和耐久性联系起来,需要进一步的研究来确定哪些测试是临床安全性和耐久性的良好指标。
Scoping Review of Mechanical Testing of the Structural and Material Properties of Lower-Limb Prosthetic Sockets
ABSTRACT Introduction Lower-limb amputations account for most cases seen by certified prosthetists in the United States. Fundamental to the success of a lower-limb prosthesis is the socket, and fundamental to the success of a socket is safety and durability. Currently, there are no standards specific to ensuring the safety and durability of lower-limb prosthetic sockets. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the mechanical testing procedures used to date to assess the structural and material properties of lower-limb prosthetic sockets, with a view to informing the development of future standards. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus databases and the Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal website to identify relevant articles. Articles published in English were included if they used mechanical testing to assess the socket and/or socket material and presented those test results. Results Fourteen articles were included in this review. They described 30 different mechanical test protocols, consisting of 12 different types of mechanical tests. The most common mechanical tests conducted were tensile, static load, and cyclic load testing. Of the 30 test protocols, 20 referenced current standards that do not include sockets within their scope and modified them in various ways to allow testing of sockets. Of the 14 included articles, 8 described using a mock residual limb during testing, all of which were unique in their composition. Conclusion Individual researchers modified existing, nonsocket standards in varying ways to adopt them for use in testing lower-limb prosthetic sockets. This scoping review describes information that may inform the development of socket-specific test protocols. Clinical Relevance Future research is needed to determine which tests are good indicators of clinical safety and durability in order to link quantitative results of mechanical testing to the safety and durability of everyday socket use.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.