基于诊断相关分组的卫生筹资在WHO三个区域的实施西太平洋、东南亚和东地中海:系统回顾

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Asim Mehmood, Z. Ahmed, Khalid Ghailan, Sushil Dohare, J. Varghese, F. Azeez
{"title":"基于诊断相关分组的卫生筹资在WHO三个区域的实施西太平洋、东南亚和东地中海:系统回顾","authors":"Asim Mehmood, Z. Ahmed, Khalid Ghailan, Sushil Dohare, J. Varghese, F. Azeez","doi":"10.1177/09720634231168250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Payment methods based on a controlled or adjusted prospective payment system rather than ‘Fee for Services’ or direct payment are considered beneficial to access the healthcare delivery services. The purpose of this review was to identify technical challenges faced by three WHO regions, namely, Western Pacific, South East Asia Eastern and the Mediterranean while establishing or adopting a diagnosis-related group (DRG)/case-mix grouper and report the extent of implementing this system for reimbursement and healthcare financing in three WHO regions, namely, Western Pacific, South East Asia Eastern and the Mediterranean. The study followed PRISMA guidelines, and 33 articles published from 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2019 were selected for critical appraisal after systematic filtration. The objectives of the implementation of the DRG system in most developed and developing countries in these regions were to bring transparency in the payment system and reduce treatment costs by avoiding unnecessary healthcare services. The countries in the study regions were at different levels of economic and social development status, therefore the implementation and adaptation status of DRG/case-mix system/grouper varied in these countries The findings revealed that most of the countries faced challenges related to inequalities and inefficiencies in the healthcare system, shortage of funding, poor documentation related to diagnosis and procedures, incomplete medical record files and lack of primary data required for the case-mix system during the DRG/case-mix adaptation phase. The results also pointed to the importance of initial pilot testing of the DRG/case-mix system/grouper and careful manipulation and adaptation to the local context, especially when the DRG system/grouper imported from other countries.","PeriodicalId":45421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"404 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Healthcare Financing Based on Diagnosis-related Group in Three WHO Regions; Western Pacific, South East Asia and Eastern Mediterranean: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Asim Mehmood, Z. Ahmed, Khalid Ghailan, Sushil Dohare, J. Varghese, F. Azeez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09720634231168250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Payment methods based on a controlled or adjusted prospective payment system rather than ‘Fee for Services’ or direct payment are considered beneficial to access the healthcare delivery services. The purpose of this review was to identify technical challenges faced by three WHO regions, namely, Western Pacific, South East Asia Eastern and the Mediterranean while establishing or adopting a diagnosis-related group (DRG)/case-mix grouper and report the extent of implementing this system for reimbursement and healthcare financing in three WHO regions, namely, Western Pacific, South East Asia Eastern and the Mediterranean. The study followed PRISMA guidelines, and 33 articles published from 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2019 were selected for critical appraisal after systematic filtration. The objectives of the implementation of the DRG system in most developed and developing countries in these regions were to bring transparency in the payment system and reduce treatment costs by avoiding unnecessary healthcare services. The countries in the study regions were at different levels of economic and social development status, therefore the implementation and adaptation status of DRG/case-mix system/grouper varied in these countries The findings revealed that most of the countries faced challenges related to inequalities and inefficiencies in the healthcare system, shortage of funding, poor documentation related to diagnosis and procedures, incomplete medical record files and lack of primary data required for the case-mix system during the DRG/case-mix adaptation phase. The results also pointed to the importance of initial pilot testing of the DRG/case-mix system/grouper and careful manipulation and adaptation to the local context, especially when the DRG system/grouper imported from other countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Management\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"404 - 413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634231168250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634231168250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于受控或调整的预期支付系统的支付方式,而不是“服务费”或直接支付,被认为有利于获得医疗保健服务。本综述的目的是确定世卫组织三个区域(西太平洋、东南亚东部和地中海)在建立或采用诊断相关分组(DRG)/病例混合分组时面临的技术挑战,并报告世卫组织三个区域(西太平洋、东南亚东部和地中海)在报销和卫生保健融资方面实施该系统的程度。本研究遵循PRISMA指南,在系统过滤后,选择2009年1月1日至2019年12月31日发表的33篇文章进行关键评估。在这些区域的大多数发达国家和发展中国家实施DRG制度的目标是提高支付系统的透明度,并通过避免不必要的医疗保健服务来降低治疗费用。研究区域的国家处于不同的经济和社会发展水平,因此DRG/病例混合系统/grouper的实施和适应状况在这些国家有所不同。研究结果表明,大多数国家面临的挑战与卫生保健系统的不平等和低效率,资金短缺,与诊断和程序相关的文件不完善,在DRG/病例混合适应阶段,病历文件不完整,缺乏病例混合系统所需的主要数据。结果还指出了对DRG/病例混合系统/石斑鱼进行初步试点测试的重要性,以及对当地情况进行仔细操作和调整的重要性,特别是当DRG系统/石斑鱼从其他国家进口时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of Healthcare Financing Based on Diagnosis-related Group in Three WHO Regions; Western Pacific, South East Asia and Eastern Mediterranean: A Systematic Review
Payment methods based on a controlled or adjusted prospective payment system rather than ‘Fee for Services’ or direct payment are considered beneficial to access the healthcare delivery services. The purpose of this review was to identify technical challenges faced by three WHO regions, namely, Western Pacific, South East Asia Eastern and the Mediterranean while establishing or adopting a diagnosis-related group (DRG)/case-mix grouper and report the extent of implementing this system for reimbursement and healthcare financing in three WHO regions, namely, Western Pacific, South East Asia Eastern and the Mediterranean. The study followed PRISMA guidelines, and 33 articles published from 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2019 were selected for critical appraisal after systematic filtration. The objectives of the implementation of the DRG system in most developed and developing countries in these regions were to bring transparency in the payment system and reduce treatment costs by avoiding unnecessary healthcare services. The countries in the study regions were at different levels of economic and social development status, therefore the implementation and adaptation status of DRG/case-mix system/grouper varied in these countries The findings revealed that most of the countries faced challenges related to inequalities and inefficiencies in the healthcare system, shortage of funding, poor documentation related to diagnosis and procedures, incomplete medical record files and lack of primary data required for the case-mix system during the DRG/case-mix adaptation phase. The results also pointed to the importance of initial pilot testing of the DRG/case-mix system/grouper and careful manipulation and adaptation to the local context, especially when the DRG system/grouper imported from other countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Management
Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信