欧洲堕胎法改革:2018年比利时和爱尔兰终止妊娠法案

Q2 Social Sciences
F. De Meyer
{"title":"欧洲堕胎法改革:2018年比利时和爱尔兰终止妊娠法案","authors":"F. De Meyer","doi":"10.1177/0968533220920335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two European countries, Belgium and Ireland, have recently reformed their abortion laws. Through a comparative approach, this article analyses the 2018 Abortion Acts and pinpoints the common challenges encountered in the drafting process. Under both legal regimes, abortion is lawful up to 12 weeks with no requirement as to reason, and provisions on a mandatory reflection period and conscientious objection only differ in detail. While later abortion is permitted in Ireland and Belgium on similar medical grounds, access to abortion on the foetal abnormality ground remains substantially more limited in Ireland as compared to Belgium. To conclude, this article reflects upon the general direction in which abortion law in Europe is heading, as exemplified by the discussed reforms. As is true for most European countries, ongoing concern regarding the level of criminalisation and barriers to safe and equitable access to abortion may necessitate further reform.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"3 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220920335","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion law reform in Europe: The 2018 Belgian and Irish Acts on termination of pregnancy\",\"authors\":\"F. De Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0968533220920335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two European countries, Belgium and Ireland, have recently reformed their abortion laws. Through a comparative approach, this article analyses the 2018 Abortion Acts and pinpoints the common challenges encountered in the drafting process. Under both legal regimes, abortion is lawful up to 12 weeks with no requirement as to reason, and provisions on a mandatory reflection period and conscientious objection only differ in detail. While later abortion is permitted in Ireland and Belgium on similar medical grounds, access to abortion on the foetal abnormality ground remains substantially more limited in Ireland as compared to Belgium. To conclude, this article reflects upon the general direction in which abortion law in Europe is heading, as exemplified by the discussed reforms. As is true for most European countries, ongoing concern regarding the level of criminalisation and barriers to safe and equitable access to abortion may necessitate further reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Law International\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220920335\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Law International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220920335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220920335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

比利时和爱尔兰这两个欧洲国家最近对其堕胎法进行了改革。通过比较的方法,本文分析了2018年《堕胎法》,并指出了起草过程中遇到的常见挑战。根据这两种法律制度,堕胎在12周内是合法的,不需要任何理由,关于强制性反思期和依良心拒服兵役的规定只是在细节上有所不同。虽然爱尔兰和比利时基于类似的医学理由允许晚些时候堕胎,但与比利时相比,爱尔兰基于胎儿异常理由堕胎的机会仍然非常有限。最后,本文反思了欧洲堕胎法的总体发展方向,所讨论的改革就是例证。正如大多数欧洲国家一样,对犯罪程度和安全公平堕胎障碍的持续担忧可能需要进一步改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abortion law reform in Europe: The 2018 Belgian and Irish Acts on termination of pregnancy
Two European countries, Belgium and Ireland, have recently reformed their abortion laws. Through a comparative approach, this article analyses the 2018 Abortion Acts and pinpoints the common challenges encountered in the drafting process. Under both legal regimes, abortion is lawful up to 12 weeks with no requirement as to reason, and provisions on a mandatory reflection period and conscientious objection only differ in detail. While later abortion is permitted in Ireland and Belgium on similar medical grounds, access to abortion on the foetal abnormality ground remains substantially more limited in Ireland as compared to Belgium. To conclude, this article reflects upon the general direction in which abortion law in Europe is heading, as exemplified by the discussed reforms. As is true for most European countries, ongoing concern regarding the level of criminalisation and barriers to safe and equitable access to abortion may necessitate further reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law International
Medical Law International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信