记录后政策时代开放的未来

C. Harrington, R. Scott
{"title":"记录后政策时代开放的未来","authors":"C. Harrington, R. Scott","doi":"10.1080/0361526X.2022.2017673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This session continues the work of a 2019 survey that investigated library policies related to Open Access (OA). Specifically, this study sought to address the self-selection of participants by randomly selecting and directly contacting academic librarians at libraries within one of four different Carnegie classifications to request input on their library’s collection development policies and the existence of OA policies or informal practices related to library collections. The findings surface disparities in the documentation of OA collection practices among institution classifications and highlight concerns about both OA and policies in the collections strategies of academic libraries.","PeriodicalId":39557,"journal":{"name":"Serials Librarian","volume":"82 1","pages":"113 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documenting an Open Future in a Post-Policy World\",\"authors\":\"C. Harrington, R. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0361526X.2022.2017673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This session continues the work of a 2019 survey that investigated library policies related to Open Access (OA). Specifically, this study sought to address the self-selection of participants by randomly selecting and directly contacting academic librarians at libraries within one of four different Carnegie classifications to request input on their library’s collection development policies and the existence of OA policies or informal practices related to library collections. The findings surface disparities in the documentation of OA collection practices among institution classifications and highlight concerns about both OA and policies in the collections strategies of academic libraries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serials Librarian\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serials Librarian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2017673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Librarian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2017673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本次会议延续了2019年的一项调查工作,该调查调查了与开放获取(OA)相关的图书馆政策。具体而言,本研究试图通过随机选择并直接联系卡内基四种不同分类之一的图书馆的学术图书馆员,来解决参与者的自我选择问题,要求他们就其图书馆的馆藏发展政策和OA政策的存在或与图书馆馆藏相关的非正式实践提供意见。研究结果揭示了机构分类中OA馆藏实践文献的差异,并强调了对学术图书馆馆藏策略中OA和政策的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Documenting an Open Future in a Post-Policy World
ABSTRACT This session continues the work of a 2019 survey that investigated library policies related to Open Access (OA). Specifically, this study sought to address the self-selection of participants by randomly selecting and directly contacting academic librarians at libraries within one of four different Carnegie classifications to request input on their library’s collection development policies and the existence of OA policies or informal practices related to library collections. The findings surface disparities in the documentation of OA collection practices among institution classifications and highlight concerns about both OA and policies in the collections strategies of academic libraries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Serials Librarian
Serials Librarian Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Serials Librarian is an international journal covering all aspects of the management of serials and other continuing resources in any format—print, electronic, etc.—ranging from their publication, to their abstracting and indexing by commercial services, and their collection and processing by libraries. The journal provides a forum for discussion and innovation for all those involved in the serials information chain, but especially for librarians and other library staff, be they in a single (continuing resources) department or in collection development, acquisitions, cataloging/metadata, or information technology departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信