{"title":"全球宪法:美国的司法审查与“调卷令”","authors":"Luiz henrique Diniz Araujo","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v7i1.73893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper exploring the writ of certiorari in the United States Constitutional Law is the second of the series “Constitutional Law Around the Globe”. This section of the series focuses on “Judicial Review and the Filters to Access Supreme and Constitutional Courts”. The first paper in the row, published in the year 2019, analyzed the Constitutionality Priority Question (Question Prioritaire de Constitutionnalite – QPC) in France. In this second paper, we analyze how the U.S. Supreme Court picks cases from thousands that reach it every year and the strategies that the Court adopts to filter these cases. The paper focuses specifically on Rule 10, the “writ of certiorari” and their operation in practice.","PeriodicalId":43129,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutional Law around the globe: judicial review in the United States and the “writ of certiorari”\",\"authors\":\"Luiz henrique Diniz Araujo\",\"doi\":\"10.5380/rinc.v7i1.73893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper exploring the writ of certiorari in the United States Constitutional Law is the second of the series “Constitutional Law Around the Globe”. This section of the series focuses on “Judicial Review and the Filters to Access Supreme and Constitutional Courts”. The first paper in the row, published in the year 2019, analyzed the Constitutionality Priority Question (Question Prioritaire de Constitutionnalite – QPC) in France. In this second paper, we analyze how the U.S. Supreme Court picks cases from thousands that reach it every year and the strategies that the Court adopts to filter these cases. The paper focuses specifically on Rule 10, the “writ of certiorari” and their operation in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i1.73893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i1.73893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文是“全球宪法”系列文章的第二篇,探讨美国宪法中的调卷令。本系列的这一部分着重于“司法审查和进入最高法院和宪法法院的过滤器”。该系列的第一篇论文发表于2019年,分析了法国的合宪性优先问题(Question priitaire de constitutionalite - QPC)。在第二篇论文中,我们分析了美国最高法院如何从每年成千上万的案件中挑选案件,以及法院采取的过滤这些案件的策略。本文着重讨论了规则10,即“调卷令”及其在实践中的应用。
Constitutional Law around the globe: judicial review in the United States and the “writ of certiorari”
This paper exploring the writ of certiorari in the United States Constitutional Law is the second of the series “Constitutional Law Around the Globe”. This section of the series focuses on “Judicial Review and the Filters to Access Supreme and Constitutional Courts”. The first paper in the row, published in the year 2019, analyzed the Constitutionality Priority Question (Question Prioritaire de Constitutionnalite – QPC) in France. In this second paper, we analyze how the U.S. Supreme Court picks cases from thousands that reach it every year and the strategies that the Court adopts to filter these cases. The paper focuses specifically on Rule 10, the “writ of certiorari” and their operation in practice.
期刊介绍:
The journal’s editorial line follows the main research areas developed by the research group (NINC), with focus on the critic study of Constitutional Law and legal and political institutions, and their connections with democracy, state intervention, fundamental rights and theories of justice, with particular emphasis on issues inserted into the contact points with fields of Public Law intimately connected with Constitutional Law, such as Administrative Law, Electoral Law and Theory of the State.